Confessions of a Woman

Hey Buffalo,

Your discussion title caught my attention.  Is there something YOU are trying to tell us?   Please do not become another Chaz Bono in reverse!    Just kidding!!!

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

What about the confessions of a man? Doesn't make any sense to me. Your choice of answers should be Guilty or Innocent, not Yes or No.

*guffaw*

Sounds like buffy's low on booze and the cable's out.

And what the hayul is a Chaz Bono?

been askin that question for a long long time.....
chastity bono was a girl who wanted to be a guy, so took hormones and had a historectmy, and then stopped.

now chaz bono if a pudgy little mushroom troll thing that's neither male nor female.

sad, really.

Close Nagle. She didn't have a historectomy. She had an addadictomy.

Well the vote count is revealing; two yes and one possible liar.

LOL

she acctually stopped short of that operation due to the risk involved.

technically, she's still female, form the waist down.

from the waist up she appears male. from the neck up .. well..

i also don't think this poll is detailed enough.

one can be guilty of adultry without cheating.

the two are dramatically different.

It seems buffalo/ram/deep dot fat thinks NO women are faithful in body or mind. Now where does he get his ideas? Been reading Cosmo, buffy? Or do your crazy thoughts come from closer to home, the  paranoid pill bottle or god forbid, well, I won't go there. The next poll should say who has NEVER cheated or NEVER had thoughts of cheating, male or female.

Pup, will you please bark at trutoitt!!??

Eruh......"WOOF! DANGIT!" 

ROFLMAO @ Ticker.  *wiping screen*  I laughed so hard it brought tears to ma eyes.

So THAT'S what a 'Chaz Bono' is!

'Addadictomy.' Heh. /me likes dat.

Now he/she/it/them/(whatever)'ll need a lifetime prescription for Mycoxafloppin.

Hoo Boyyyyy.

*facepalm*

Women are primitively programmed to nest and procreate and care for the young,  they are not loyal to a male mate,  they are always on the look for a better provider of quality makeup to produce quality offspring, thus they are highly capable of adultery,  a concept which came thousands of years after the primitive programming originated by the way.  And of course the male is programmed to run from one vessel to another for the same person.  So marriage was artificially created to keep men from fighting over women,  and it's a tenuous arrangement at best.   So everyone has the strong urge to commit this religion created concept of control of the original purpose of man and woman, which makes for fun and rich lawyers.

Thanks pup; that spooked him.

So evil, you are saying it is ok to ’nest’ around ?

I was just explaining why the environment is ripe for these women here to feel guilty.  They as Jimmy Carter have all sinned in their heart because of their primitive programming in their brain they have nothing to do with.  Thus the guilt you have sensed.  As far as it being OK, that is up to the individual person and their belief system.   It's ok with me if you want to experience life to it's fullest.

does that mean your spouse is free to mess around?

As I said that is up to the generic spouse in this conversation.   But another disclaimer, just because you want to experience this hypothetical "messing" around apparently bluetick, doesn't mean you're of a quality to attract someone to "mess" around with you.  So put that in your equation as you wander out to fulfil some primal need before it causes damage to your psyche.

OO! Dat's right! And if you're catholic and you THOUGHT it-You DID IT!

I'd almost forgotten that particular flavor of mind control....

Wul evil genius, are you saying that a non-religious person such as the atheist candidate would be pre-emptive to assume the right of ownership of a wife’s certain property in preference to that right of another person?

Actually an atheist would probably be more respectful of an arrangement between two or more people, because they would be respecting other's binding relationship out of some personal honor and thought for a civil society, decreasing the chance of an adulterous type event, more so than a religious person whose third party interaction would be tempered by a religious based taboo, and we all know what happens to vibrant sexually people when a taboo is involved,  it leads to a boiling of the blood like a Vulcan in their 7 year sexual cycle, and tends to lead to aggressive interactions. 

I see clearly now.

Maybe you had a mate that wasn't loyal but there are many women that has no desire to cheat on her mate. The only desire she has is for her mate. And not all men run from one woman to another. We're all human & there's nothing wrong with either one looking. It's those people that go beyond looking that creates the problem, but not all take that road.

Spock! Is that you?

Yes, is that you nurse Chappel?  Let's get together in 3.7 years please.

Semiannualchik I was talking about primitive programming not how you and your girlfriends actually interact with the male of the species after thousands of years of the human evolving experience.

Evil, I’m not sure if you have covered this point sufficiently but what about the constant preening on the part of females under contract practiced outside the home and away from the husband and the obvious propensity to increase the probability to yield a favorable outcome of fantasy obvious by the skill with which the ‘thing’ is constantly presented for the attention of males.

Just curious if you have a theory.

Buffalo, you're a wise and observant man.   You have highlighted one of the techniques nature has provided the female of species to attract the male.  As you know many non human species provide females with flamboyant colors and preening techniques to give themselves an advantage in vying for a male mate.  The human species depends more on the female decorating herself with ornate decor composed of jewelry, and make up configurations, as well as certain preening mechanisms in their walk and strut in the extreme.  You can observe these rituals of attraction at shopping malls and church services.

You are correct in your assumtion EG. I am of rather low quality, but I have found there are a large percentage of "happily married" females out there whose primal urges steer them towards the slumming it side. Even a repulsive smelly old dog like myself can toss out enough hooks and sooner or later he'll land one or two. Just for the sake of setting the record straight, I never "wandered out" to fulfill (correctly spelled) my primal needs. They came to me, usually waking me up at three or four in the morning.

Disclaimer: Of course that was before. I am now a born again virgin. No females were harmed in the making of this post.

I believe, as in the case of Birds, the more flamboyant and colorful ones are the males of the species. I know this is true in Cardinals. Maybe our resident orinthologist Upsidedehead could enlighten us.

You are correct bluetick,  I appologize for the error,  I hadn't had breakfast when I made that post and my blood sugar was volatile.  Sometimes to prove a point, my facts "wander to fulfill" my ideas.

No problem EV. Shoot,sometime I make up facts to fulfill my ideas.

Where are these women? Are there any of this type still out there?

Yes Blind Mellon, you may have to enlist the services of tic, muzzled of course and the genital cuff in place, as a companion to your handicap.

You're to much!! Be careful who you let "deflower" you.