Conservative women, and men, vote. I, as a conservative, am offended by the language of Donald Trump, just as I'm sure my conservative [and then Southern Democrat] parents were of Harry Truman. But if we don't vote for the candidate whose language offends us, then by default we vote for the candidate we feel is unfit.
Trump has been documented making degrading remarks against women. According to him [though no women have come forward to substantiate / witness], he groped them. But, if true, he did so and not on company time.
Bill Clinton's exploits were on "company time." Time the citizens of Arkansas and the US paid for. Both bad public or private if not consensual but bad even if consensual on public time. Difference is, you got a private business, you want to pay for whoopee, have at it. But not so on public time. Not on our time, not on our dime.
So along comes self-righteous Hillary = the champion of women's and children's rights. When the battle was brought to her doorstep, what did she do? Did she wrap her arms around the women her husband defiled while using the position of his office? Oh hell no. She knew this serial sexual offender was her ticket to fame. To where? Where ever because she knew without him, the world, not even her neighbors, would ever hear of Hillary Rodham.
If ever there was a time she could have "stood by her man like Tammy Wynette" this was it, and she didn't miss a beat instead of not standing by women's rights which she claims she did. And poor child Chelsea = never mentioned.
In addition to claiming to be a staunch defender of women's rights, what other group does she claim to be a 30 or 40 year defender. In the last debate we heard it several times = as a wife and grandmother = the children.
Yes, the children. Forgetting for a moment she defended a child rapist.
Chelsea Clinton just turned Sweet Sixteen 1996 when she learned of her 49 year old daddy leaving his DNA on a 22 year old in the house she and her mother lived. I imagine a lot of women reading this forum are around Chelsea's age. Men, too. Can identify with what follows.
Then the cat was out of the bag. Practically every house Chelsea she had ever shared with her daddy since she was born, her daddy was effin another woman not his wife, not her momma. And Chelsea's momma knew it and could have taken her away from this dysfunctional environment because, after all Hillary is the champion of children's rights = but she did not. Hillary brought Chelsea up in this sleaze. It was Hillary's choice.
Hillary was over her head with the conflict with what she wanted to do [be a political w*h*o*r*e and what needed to be done with Chelsea] so she writes a book "It takes a Village" which is nothing more than a primer on how to avoid parental responsibility and shove it off on the government. Trying the identify with single mothers and talk black at the same time. If you don't think there's a Hillary correlation between the two, google them.
Those of us who have daughters around Chelsea's age of 36, hopefully have role models because every daughter Chelsea's age d*a*m*n well knows Monica. Hopefully they don't have fathers who effed other women in their homes. Don't have mothers who stood by their man if they did. Vice versus. The good parent removed the child from the dysfunctional environment.
Hillary = defender of children's and women's rights. Hillary = following Michelle's advice reach high sister.
Hillary = the absolute highest of hypocrisy.
So you see, it's Hillary that makes a moralist such as I vote for the only viable alternative to her. Boils down to actions speak louder than words.
Republican super moralist have to catch on. You can reign in Trump ugly talk. You can an least try. But if you give it up to Clinton without a fight over what is rather than what could be, y'all are sissy's of the first order.