Skip to main content

Experts: Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile 'Muted response' was decision 'made by the president himself'

FROM JOSEPH FARAH'S G2 BULLETIN
WorldNetDaily Exclusive

Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are raising provocative and disturbing questions about the government's official response, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.

Two governmental military experts with extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems have examined the television video and conclude the mysterious contrail originating some 30 miles off the coast near Los Angeles did not come from a jet – but rather, they say the exhaust and the billowing plume emanated from a single source nozzle of a missile, probably made in China.

They further suggest the missile was fired from a submerged Chinese nuclear submarine off America's coast, and point out that the timing of the alleged Chinese missile shot coincided with an increasing confrontation between the U.S. and China, and was likely meant to send a message to Washington.

Indeed, the Federal Aviation Administration documents that there were no aircraft flying in the area at that time, the night of Nov. 8.

"The question that still must be answered is why NORAD's muted response was simply that North America was not threatened, and later our government approved the lame excuse that the picture recorded was simply an aircraft leaving a contrail," said retired U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Jim Cash.

A former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot and commander of an F-15 squadron and an F-16 wing, Cash was assigned to NORAD as an assistant director of operations at the Cheyenne Mountain complex near Colorado Springs, Colo., and is fully knowledgeable of NORAD procedures.

"There is absolutely no doubt that what was captured on video off the coast of California was a missile launch, was clearly observed by NORAD, assessed by a four-star general in minutes, and passed to the president immediately," he said.

Even more ominously, cautioned Cash: "We must question the timing of this shot across our bow. The president was abroad being diplomatic, which means trying to placate China which is becoming overly concerned with our handling a totally out-of-control deficit in spending."

Wayne Madsen, a former naval officer who has worked at the National Security Agency and the Naval Data Automation Command, said the inability to pick up what he described as a Chinese Jin-class submarine-launched ballistic missile isn't the first time U.S. Navy anti-submarine warfare sensors have failed.

Madsen, who today is an investigative journalist, said the Pentagon is working "overtime with the media and on the Internet to cover up the latest debacle. However, even some reporters who cover the Pentagon full-time are beginning to question the Pentagon's version of events ... over the skies west of Los Angeles."

Dr. Lyle J. Rapacki of Sentinel Intelligence Services, LLC, said the contrail incident off the Los Angeles coast is "fraught with peril" due to the defense systems and protocols in place that should have detected the alleged submarine.

"The decision to officially announce that North America was not threatened," he said, "and all the excitement was due to an aircraft leaving a contrail is a decision that reaches beyond the four-star general level and goes directly to a decision made by the commander-in-chief."

G2Bulletin calls to the Pentagon and NORAD for comment beyond previous official statements were not returned.


consider this warning Paul gave: "See then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you too will be cut off" (Rom. 11:22)

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by onepatriot7:
i believe if i lived in LA, i'd be moving inland very quickly, that definaely looks like a missle contrail to me.


If I had to live in LA, I'd welcome a missile.


agreed, Lol, folks on here often complain about the shoals area, but, having lived in many different places in my life, we are truly Blessed with our wonderful little area.
quote:
Originally posted by onepatriot7:
quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by onepatriot7:
i believe if i lived in LA, i'd be moving inland very quickly, that definaely looks like a missle contrail to me.


If I had to live in LA, I'd welcome a missile.


agreed, Lol, folks on here often complain about the shoals area, but, having lived in many different places in my life, we are truly Blessed with our wonderful little area.



I agree wholeheartedly. I consider myself blessed to live here in such a beautiful area. I'd sure hate to know I had to live in LA.
quote:
I suspect we were testing a standoff missile launched from a torpedo tube capable of either anti-ship or anti-aircraft attack.


Or it could have been an airliner's contrail that appears to flying straight up because of the curvature of the Earth.

quote:
Michio Kaku sits down with ABC News and provides a few explanations into the recent California Missile Mystery. Dr. Kaku leans towards the fact that the plume was most likely caused from an airplane. The recent air scare prompted prompted people to think it was a missile but both the U.S. NAVY and NORAD dismissed the claims of an accidental launch. Shortly after Dr. Kaku’s interview, it was confirmed that the contrail was caused by a passenger jet traveling from LAX to Phoenix.

http://mkaku.org/
quote:
What the heck were they using for fuel?


The same fuel as the plane that formed this contrail.


http://www.flickr.com/photos/jameslj/2064137190/

Given that the speed of all the traffic in the area at that time was at regular aircraft speed, the object was an airplane. If it was a Chinese missile, the Mississippi ANG could be given the job of anti-missile defense using empty Rebel Yell bottles as kinetic interceptors.
quote:
quote:
Indeed, the Federal Aviation Administration documents that there were no aircraft flying in the area at that time, the night of Nov. 8.



according to the first thread post...


America West Airlines Flight 808 from Hawaii traveling to Phoenix was in the area at that time.

quote:
There's a rich history of unexplained contrails being attributed to secret aircraft, UFOs and, yes, even missiles, and the problem comes down to how the human eye perceives direction ."[A]s surprising as it may sound, the object seems to have been simply an aircraft contrail, with tricks of perspective making it look like a missile flying away from you, when in fact it was an aircraft flying toward you!" Robert Sheaffer writes on Bad UFOs, a skeptic blog.

What the camera crew saw that made them think it was a missile is nothing more than an optical illusion created by the angle they were viewing it from, according to Contrail Science, a blog that is dedicated to busting myths about contrails. In a detailed explanation, the blog says the alleged "missile" is likely America West Airlines Flight 808 from Hawaii to Phoenix.
According to Contrail Science, there are three reasons why the contrail looked like a missile: A horizontal contrail can look vertical depending on the angle you're viewing it from; as contrails disperse, they give the mistaken perception of being closer to the viewer, when it fact they are further away; and contrails that look like they are starting from the ground are really simply beyond the horizon.

In other words, the brain does not see physics.
http://www.aolnews.com/nation/...not-missile/19711033
Checking again, there was another non-existent airplane in the area at the time:

quote:
One of my commenters below has given me some critical information that has lead me to update my assement of what flight caused the "mystery missile" contrail. Make no mistake, I stand by my assertion that the event was nothing more than a contrail, however, new, solid data has come in that has me changing my theory that the contrail in question was not caused by US Airways flight 808 (AWE808) but rather my second contender, United Parcel Service flight 902 (UPS902). In fact I believe I can definitevely say that UPS 902 was the flight that created the contrail on November 8, 2010.
http://blog.bahneman.com/conte...s-airways-flight-808
quote:
Originally posted by elinterventor01:
The Chinese have only one sub capable of firing ballistic missiles and reliable enough to cross the Pacific. (Four more are being built.) I suspect we were testing a standoff missile launched from a torpedo tube capable of either anti-ship or anti-aircraft attack.


Assuming this is right and we have no reason to doubt it, why would China risk it's only sub with these capabilities. NORAD could have shot the h*ll out of it.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×