Ann Coulter waxes lyrically about how George W. Bush has allegedly protected this country from another al-Qaida attack. That neocon nitwit has no idea whether Bush has or has not done anything relative to any attempted al-Qaida attacks on this country. The Islamist mentality does not find it necessary to subscribe to American estimates of the frame within which they might try to pull off another attack. A lot of analysts worry the most about the prospect of a big-time nuclear detonation (God forbid!) which COULD be what these vermin have in mind for next time, in which case they might well be holding back on other and lesser forms of attack so as not to engender even more security measures than are already in place. In any case, whatever security we have achieved can not be laid to Bush's personal credit. It is obvious that he is so ueless about just about everything else, so what justification is there for crediting him personally with saving us from some (supposed) terrorist attack? Here is the ignorant right wing rant from Annie C.:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26979
Original Post