Skip to main content

As an Atheist I was very pleased with the outcome of the Thursday September 30th debate at the University of North Alabama.
The topic, "God does not exist" was defended by Blair Scott, communications director of American Atheists Inc., while Kyle Butt, christian apologist with Apologetics Press argued against.
It was a sterling example of the dichotomy between the two sides. The black and white certainties of religion versus the multi-colored possibilities of reality.
Blair in his initial remarks admitted the impossible task of proving a negative anywhere except in mathematics. But challenged the audience to do the research for themselves. Butt told them to read their bible, and boasted he had already won the debate.
And there lies the heart of the matter. Christians are focused on concepts and philosophies that predate contemporary knowledge, and insist the evolution of understanding over the millennium is made  irrelevant by ancient "inspired text."
Atheist, however aren't content with easy answers, and don't shy away from doing the necessary research or from accepting unconventional ideas.
Both sides got what they were seeking. The Christian Apologist reinforced the certainty of their base, and the Atheist affirmed the need to explore all aspects of reality. It was a win win event.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Nice extrapolation. We're all the same except where we're willing to stop our search for answers about our universe and declare that no more can be known. For some, many important questions were adequately answered millennia ago. Atheists know and love that human knowledge about everything is progressively evolving and that each new breakthrough ignites dozens of new questions to pursue.

Not all Christian Apologists are against exploration of reality..I think balance is key. Faith will never be presented in an evidentiary manner- it goes against it's very definition- belief without evidence. 

I'm glad the debate went well. Would love to read a transcript. 

You know what gets me? That Christians are sometimes put in the light as "non-thinkers". 

My question is this- does being a believer in God, in Jesus make one stupid, or "naive".? 
No. It's just another realm of our being- physical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual.

Can't all aspects of our being just get along?  

Hi vp

 

Believers aren't all stupid by default just as atheists aren't all intelligent by default.

As to your first point, it has always been my experience that I can only push so far in the "exploration of reality" with every believer. How far is dependent on the person and their beliefs, but EVERY believer I've ever dealt with has a point at which they will no longer follow the same logic and evidence that has served them so well in life. It is at that point that that conversation is ended, one way or another, by the believer. It ALWAYS ends with the believer closing the door to possible answers.

Originally Posted by vplee123:

Not all Christian Apologists are against exploration of reality..I think balance is key. Faith will never be presented in an evidentiary manner- it goes against it's very definition- belief without evidence. 

I'm glad the debate went well. Would love to read a transcript. 

You know what gets me? That Christians are sometimes put in the light as "non-thinkers". 

My question is this- does being a believer in God, in Jesus make one stupid, or "naive".? 
No. It's just another realm of our being- physical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual.

Can't all aspects of our being just get along?  

Veep, truth is the key.  The world cannot be both only 6000 years old, as Butt says, and billions of years old as every science says.  We must choose.

 

DF

At the end of the day beliefs are just beliefs. This is a debate that has been going on since the beginning of time. It will continue long after me and you are gone. While you may eventually convince someone why you believe the things you believe, that person is free to believe what they want to believe. As are we all.

Why do you think there are so many denominations and religions? Because people can never agree 100% about god and religion. They never will. Life goes on.

Believe what you want to believe and don't try to force those beliefs on those around you. Live and let live.

I agree with all that is above- the world is a kazillion years old. The creation story? Well, It's enough for me to accept that God had a hand in it, and that is simply enough. 

And you are right- there is a point in which believers just say "enough" already. Because it is impossible to prove the presence of God in the open. WE can all have personal revelations, and moments in our lives in which we feel the Hand of God, but that cannot be conveyed to another person with the same convincing. 

"live and let live"= AMEN! Whatever path, whatever beliefs you possess- execute them fairly and honestly- live a life of compassion and kindness. So whatever life you live, live it to the fullest, live it well, and live it like there's no tomorrow!  

Originally Posted by dark dreamer:
Why do you think there are so many denominations and religions? Because people can never agree 100% about god and religion. They never will. Life goes on.

Believe what you want to believe and don't try to force those beliefs on those around you. Live and let live.

_____________________________

Good points. I've always said you can ask 10 different people what one scripture means & you'll get 10 different answers.

Sadly, there will always be those like Bill Gray that will try to force his beliefs & how he sees the Bible on others. It's all because he & others like him believe they have to work their way to Heaven by telling others what the Bible says.

It's all about that "Soul-Winner's Crown" - they think they have to labor to save souls from the fires of Hell.

 

Hi Senior,

 

I find your opening comments very revealing.  You write:

 

As an Atheist I was very pleased with the outcome of the Thursday September 30th debate at the University of North Alabama.  The topic, "God does not exist" was defended by Blair Scott, communications director of American Atheists Inc., while Kyle Butt, christian apologist with Apologetics Press argued against.

 

Notice that you capitalize Atheist, Thursday, University of North Alabama, Blair Scott, American Atheists Inc, Apologetics Press, etc. -- but, you do not capitalize Christian.  Why?  Was this merely a convenient oversight -- or a purposeful slight?

 

Most people do not capitalize Atheist because it is not a proper name.  Yet, Christian is a proper name -- a form taken from the name of Jesus Christ.   So, what was it, Senior, oversight or contempt?

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Bill, haven't you made the claim that atheism is a religion? So I will ask you, why do you not capitalize the word atheist or atheism when you post it? Is it an oversight or contempt on your part, or is it that you don't think atheism is a religion and only make that claim thinking it's some sort of insult? Could you clear that up for us??

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course, atheists will not be happy to see that Theocracy come

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Well there really is some common ground here...yes I did attend, and did intend to bring up the obvious condesention toward Atheists in the grammar of certain individuals here. I also want to apologize for the error in the topic...this new iPad has different ideas about what I mean to say sometimes.
We are all in this together, and the existence of Atheists, with a capital "A" would be unnecessary if capital "C" christians weren't so pedantic about their beliefs.
Originally Posted by SeniorCoffee:
We are all in this together, and the existence of Atheists, with a capital "A" would be unnecessary if capital "C" christians weren't so pedantic about their beliefs.

-----------------------------------------------------

So Coffee, Those dirty christians cut off your nose, or did you cut off your nose

to spite your salvation?

 

.

Originally Posted by SeniorCoffee:
Well there really is some common ground here...yes I did attend, and did intend to bring up the obvious condesention toward Atheists in the grammar of certain individuals here. I also want to apologize for the error in the topic...this new iPad has different ideas about what I mean to say sometimes.
We are all in this together, and the existence of Atheists, with a capital "A" would be unnecessary if capital "C" christians weren't so pedantic about their beliefs.

 

 

The last time I checked, Jesus Christ was a proper name, ergo capitalized. Atheism or atheist is not. Shall we no longer capitalize Buddha, etal.? Why capitalize anything since it obviously takes time away from typing? I thought one point by atheists on this forum is that they follow rules in the same manner a Christian or Jew would, but perhaps not?

 

How sad that one would capitalize Charles Manson or Adolph Hitler, but not Christ...

 

Pedantic? Another word that has fallen on hard times it would seem.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×