Democrat: White House is low-balling costs of Libya mission

By Seth McLaughlin-The Washington Times
11:30 a.m., Thursday, April 7, 2011

A Democratic lawmaker said Thursday that the White House is “dramatically underestimating” the cost of the nation’s military involvement in Libya by relying on misleading accounting.

“That effort is costing us billions a week,” Rep. Brad Sherman, California Democrat and a certified public accountant, said in his opening remarks at a House Foreign Relations Committee hearing on reforming the United Nations with Susan E. Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

Last week, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates testified that the nation’s initial involvement in establishing a no-fly zone over the skies of Libya carried a $550 million price tag and that the cost going forward would be about $40 million a month. He also assured lawmakers he had enough money in his budget to absorb the costs without asking Congress for new funding — though he wasn’t ready to say where exactly the money would come from.

But Mr. Sherman on Thursday said the estimates are based on what’s known as “marginal-cost accounting,” which doesn’t include costs for things such as overhead from the development of the weapons systems and equipment being used, or the salaries of the people involved in the effort.

“We need to use full-cost accounting,” Mr. Sherman said.

Original Post
Originally posted by ferrellj:
Originally posted by 73RangerXLT:
And Bush saiod Iraq would cost 50 biliion. So when are going to get fed up with being lied to and get rid of BOTH parties?

And replace them with what?

With people who understand the Constitution and are willing to uphold it.
That will start with removing the soft and corporate money from politics. The so called tea party is starting to become republicanized.

Add Reply

Likes (0)