Skip to main content

Democrats threaten to impeach Justice Kavanaugh

On another post topic, called "Democratic Backfires" I mention some things that Democrats did that came back to haunt them.  Among those things are eliminating the filibuster for Judges and "The Biden Rule" where a Supreme Court Justice appointment was held up until the next President was elected.

Now some Democrats are saying that, if they win the House, they will move to impeach Justice Kavanaugh.  It should be that there should be evidence to warrant impeachment of someone but in this case and with modern day Democrats all it takes is someone who comes forth with an accusation.  If they got away with Kavanaugh why would they stop there?  You'd hear about Anita Hill all over again and they would go for Justice Thomas.  Thankfully he most likely would never be removed because it would take the Senate to approve it by a 2/3rd vote and Democrats wouldn't have that or most likely they wouldn't but again here the Democrats would be setting a precedent for future Republicans to use against nominees that they didn't like.  Maybe though Democrats are not ever planning on losing again.

Be as the Bereans ( Acts 17:11 )

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

editorial in the Times Daily supports media being attacked.   However how many times have we all attended something and read a different account in a paper?  The media focuses on less than 1%.   The protestors were loud however really aren't a large sample of our population.   The black lives matter focused on less than 1 % while ignoring the majority of black deaths.  It goes on and on.  

Is Alabama sorry for listening to 30 year old allegations on Moore?  The supreme court was Jones's first major vote and he showed he isn't moderate and will vote how the money tells him to.   

Moore never ever attacked anyone, bothered anyone, and it says a lot that his "accusers" have gone back under their rock. One thing the left counts on is that when they tell a lie, no matter how it is proven to be a lie, others on the left keep it going and alive. Like the lie that Moore was banned from a shopping mall and the lie about the "kids in cages" under Trump. It makes no sense why anyone would vote for a democrat.

Last edited by Jutu
Jutu posted:

Moore never ever attacked anyone, bothered anyone, and it says a lot that his "accusers" have gone back under their rock. One thing the left counts on is that when they tell a lie, no matter how it is proven to be a lie, others on the left keep it going and alive. Like the lie that Moore was banned from a shopping mall and the lie about the "kids in cages" under Trump. It makes no sense why anyone would vote for a democrat.

Attacks? There's a libel trial scheduled over just that thing, so how can you say he never did it? Banning? There are no records from that time. A former manager says no, the former head of security says yes. The former manager is now a friend of Moore! So unless you have new info, there's no way to say what really happened.

Dr. John posted:
Jutu posted:

Moore never ever attacked anyone, bothered anyone, and it says a lot that his "accusers" have gone back under their rock. One thing the left counts on is that when they tell a lie, no matter how it is proven to be a lie, others on the left keep it going and alive. Like the lie that Moore was banned from a shopping mall and the lie about the "kids in cages" under Trump. It makes no sense why anyone would vote for a democrat.

Attacks? There's a libel trial scheduled over just that thing, so how can you say he never did it? Banning? There are no records from that time. A former manager says no, the former head of security says yes. The former manager is now a friend of Moore! So unless you have new info, there's no way to say what really happened.

No, a former head of security did not say yes. Everyone says NO. There was a man banned, but it was NOT Moore. Keep spreading those lies. Moore never physically attacked anyone. Libel suit? Because he called her a LIAR.

“Because I have denied Leigh Corfman’s allegations of sexual misconduct, I will now be forced to try this case in a county where the supposed event did not occur, where she does not live, and where there exists no evidence or witnesses to prove anything,” Moore said in the statement. “This is ridiculous!”

Moore has also counter-sued Corfman and has another defamation lawsuit in Etowah County against other accusers who spoke against him during his campaign.

Roy Moore

 

"There's a libel trial scheduled over just that thing, so how can you say he never did it"?

How can you say he did do it?? Unless you have some info there is no way for you to say he did it.

Last edited by Jutu

Former mall security head J.D. Thomas said yes. In other words, he told more than one mgr that Moore was banned.

While attack and assault are not the same thing, we agree the current court case is over assault. As for the waitress' claims of attack, they have not been disproved.

Moore is a slimeball pure and simple.

Democrats cared less about Mrs. Ford the was just a means to an end.  The whole Kavanaugh story and episode was not about a reported attempted assault on Ford but was about another Conservative Justice on the Court and fear that abortions (Row) would be overturned or diminished.  Other Liberals, as the writer on the Cobet show, indicated, there was glee in the destruction of Kavanaugh's life, family, reputation etc.   

In Moore's case, the same tactics were employed against him, resurrecting activities, or an allegation, from when he was younger.  In Moore's case though there was more collaborating evidence and a more credible person making the accusation.  At least they could remember details whereas Mrs. Ford couldn't remember anything.  Also with Mrs. Ford, there was many glaring inconsistencies such as her saying she was afraid to fly yet it was proven she flew regularly.  I also think that the story about seeing Matt Judge at the supermarket that he worked at didn't pass the smell test.  If she was so devastated over this that she couldn't even be in the same room as Kavanaugh and If someone had an attempted sexual assault, successful or not, I can't see them being friendly with their known attacker.  I would hate though she would have run the other direction instead, she said she said Hello or HI to him making casual contact.  Just many things she said did not seem credible and all though it she had the two lawyers assisting her in answering and most likely prepared her in advance of the Senate hearing.

democrats also used it to try and get women votes.   However the common sense women I know realize it was 36 years ago in high school.  They also know Moore's incident was 30 years ago.  Personally people don't really mature till late 20s maybe even early thirties.   I republicans hadn't bailed on Moore the vote for judge would have been easy.  Democrats have soon that they will do anything to win, including making up things and lying.  Sadly many  voters fall for their antics.  Every voter needs to ignore what dems say and vote republican.  What often hurts is voters go libertarian and take votes away from republicans.  

Of all the problems I have with it, the major one is how the left has tried to elevate the accusation of a groping to rape status, and now out and out calls Kavanaugh a rapist and an alcoholic....not deserving of a fair hearing. Too, I can't get around that hypocritical attitude the left has. How many times has it been said....the left has gone insane. More and more people are beginning to actually fear the left. Rightfully so.

You can just IMAGINE what it's going to be like for Trump's next nominee if another Justice was to retire or die and especially if that justice was Ginsburg.  Democrats are already talking about if they gain political power (Congress and Executive branch), stacking the court with liberals by increasing the number of Justices and appointing liberals to those new positions to offset the Conservatives.   If another liberal court position comes open they surely will be unhinged on steroids.  Dem's better watch because, as history proves, what comes around goes around and so often what they do, for their own benefit, very often comes back to haunt them when their opposition gets back in power.

Maybe they have a plan whereby they will never again lose power.  Many Democrats would love to do away with elections altogether if they are the ones in power at that time mind you.

Last edited by gbrk

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×