Skip to main content

Hi to my Forum Friends,

In the discussion begun by Uno, titled "Apology To Ono" -- Uno tells O No, "A few weeks ago, I made a post that stated that Jesus commanded that non believers be brought before him to be killed.  The exact verse is Luke 19:27 that reads, 'But those enemies of  mine who did not want me to be king over them -- bring them here and kill them in front of me.'

I stated these words were uttered by Jesus as an example of the hatred Jesus had for non-believers.  You accused me of taking the quote out of context and then posted the entire chapter.  I skimmed over what you wrote and then claimed that what you posted did not change the context at all.  I was wrong.

So, we can still talk about the hateful intent of Jesus' parable.  I think it is a sucky story and would never dream of trying to teach my followers a lesson by insinuating a death threat but, you were right, I was wrong."

And, you are wrong again.  When Jesus taught using parables, His intent was to teach a lesson.  In this "parable of the pounds" (Luke 19:11-27) He is teaching about the gifts a believer is given -- and the rewards, or lack of rewards, the believer will receive depending upon how he/she uses those gifts.

A believer is told to "Go, Make Disciples, Baptize Them, Teach Them" (Matthew 28:19-20) and to be "His witness" in all the world (Acts 1:8, Mark 16:15).  In other words, the believer is told, by Jesus Christ, to take His Gospel to all the lost in the world.

So, the believer who does this diligently -- will be rewarded more abundantly than the believer who receives the gifts -- and then becomes a "Couch Potato Christian."  What is a "Couch Potato Christian"?   This is one who has been given the tremendous blessing of eternal life in Christ, who has been given a knowledge of God's Word, the Gospel of Jesus Christ -- and, then, just sits on his/her couch saying, "Well, if anyone wants to hear about this, he will ask me" or "I really don't want to push my beliefs on anyone else" or "If I try to share Jesus Christ with people, it will just turn them off and drive them away from Jesus."

My Friends, they are already "away from Jesus!"   When a person is on the bottom, the only way to go is up.  And, our task, given in the Great Commission, is to help them begin to look up, to look up and find Jesus Christ and eternal life.  We are not, in any way, ever, told by Jesus Christ, "You just sit there and wait until someone comes to you and shows an interest."

And, the worst kind of Couch Potato Christian is the one who proclaims, "Jesus told us to love everyone.  He did not tell us to preach to them!  I will show Jesus Christ to others by just being nice to them!"

WRONG!  Jesus told us to "Go, Make Disciples, Baptize Them, Teach Them."  We cannot GO as long as we are sitting on our couch -- waiting for them to come to us.

Keep in mind the old saying, "God cannot guide your path -- if you are not moving!"

In this parable, Jesus is speaking of the two judgments to come -- the Believer's Judgment, i.e., Bema Seat Judgment for believers (2 Corinthians 5:10, 1 Peter 5:4, 1 Corinthians 3:11-15) and the Great White Throne Judgment for non-believers (Revelation 20:11-15).

For the believers, we read in Luke 19:26 (nkjv), "For I say to you, that to everyone who has will be given; and from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him."    By this, He is telling us that those believers who have worked diligently to share the Word of God with the world -- will receive great rewards.

But, those Couch Potato Christians who died still waiting for folks to come to them so that they could evangelize -- will get few, if any, rewards in heaven.  Oh, don't get me wrong.  The greatest reward is being in heaven with our Lord and Savior.  But, wouldn't it be much better to hear Him say, "Well done, good servant; because you were faithful. . ."  (Luke 19:17 nkjv)?

Now to the verse which has Uno so excited, so giggly, we read in Luke 19:27, "But bring here those enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, and slay them before me."

So, is Jesus Christ gloating in joy over killing His enemy?  No, for we are told in 2 Peter 3:9, "The Lord is not slow about His  promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance."

However, you and I know there are many, many people who will continue to deny God, continue to deny Jesus Christ, and continue to do all in their power to denigrate God's Written Word, the Bible -- until they breathe their last breath in this mortal body.

At the end of His Millennial Reign on earth, those people WILL be resurrected to stand before Jesus Christ in judgment -- the Great White Throne Judgment (Revelation 20:11-15) -- and, then, these enemies of Jesus Christ, these people who absolutely refused to receive Him as Lord and Savior -- will go into the second death, the lake of fire, i.e., hell -- because they have chosen this for themselves.  They have sent themselves to hell.  God did not do thisGod offered them every possible way to avoid hell -- but, they  refused -- sending themselves into hell for eternity.

These are the people Jesus Christ describes in this "parable of the pounds" -- when He tells the gathered crown in Jericho, "But his citizens hated him, and sent a delegation after him, saying, 'We will not have this man to reign over us"  (Luke 19:14).

Yes, the non-believers will continue to harden their hearts, they will continue to deny Him as this verse tells us -- until they have passed the point of no return.  These people are in the same condition we find described in Hebrews 6:6 where the people had heard the Gospel, had heard the Word of God -- but, had hardened their hearts against Him, turning back to Judaism.  Because of their hardened hearts, there is no way for them to be saved -- thus, the unforgivable sin, dying without knowing Jesus Christ as Lord and  Savior.

So, Uno, in your atheistic fervor, you try to blacken the words of Jesus Christ by writing, "So, we can still talk about the hateful intent of Jesus' parable.  I think it is a sucky story and would never dream of trying to teach my followers a lesson by insinuating a death threat. . ."  All this tells us is that you, Uno, have no understanding, have no desire to understand -- what this Scripture passage, this parable shared by Jesus Christ, is really teaching us.

But, now that I have explained the meaning -- would you like to talk about receiving Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior?

It is very simple -- even an atheist can do it!   If you would like to talk more about your salvation, please feel free to contact me.  We  can do this in a Private Message if you like.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

1 - Will Work For Jesus_Outline-2

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1 - Will Work For Jesus_Outline-2
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Bill, according to these 2 scriptures, it’s not your place to judge unbelievers. If Jesus did not come to judge, who are you to do so?

 

1 Cor 5:12-13 (NIV)

What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside.
John 3:17 (NIV)]

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

 

Your trademark is to condemn/judge other people rather than to focus on your own life. You’re going to stand before Jesus someday too, & when you do He’s not going to ask about someone elses life. Even though He will already know, I'm pretty sure He's going to want to know every detail about you, your lack of love/compassion, & your harsh judgment of others.

Do you really think anyone is going to contact you to talk about their

salvation?

quote:   Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

Bill, according to these 2 scriptures, it’s not your place to judge unbelievers.  If Jesus did not come to judge, who are you to do so?


Hi Chick,

 

Please show me, in my post, where I have judged anyone.  Of course, you will declare, "Well, you have done it many times!"  Which is not true; but in this discussion, that is irrelevant.   You have posted in this discussion that, in this writing, you feel I am trying to judge.  Please show us that -- in this discussion.

 

Or, is this just your "Pavlov" response to anything I write?

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Originally Posted by CrustyMac:

Try "Couch Potato Christians" as an example.

****************************************************************

Thank you, Crusty. I thought the same thing but didn't say it because Bill chooses to play his games when we "show" him or "proves" something when he ask for it.

A week ago he asked me to prove to him that he puts words in people's mouth. I did & he hasn't bothered to respond to it because he can't without looking stupid.

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
Originally Posted by CrustyMac:

Try "Couch Potato Christians" as an example.

****************************************************************

Thank you, Crusty. I thought the same thing but didn't say it because Bill chooses to play his games when we "show" him or "proves" something when he ask for it.

A week ago he asked me to prove to him that he puts words in people's mouth. I did & he hasn't bothered to respond to it because he can't without looking stupid.

--------------------

Well, You know what I always say, Someone has to look stupid and it

might as well be stupid Billie- Je.

 

.

quote:   Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
quote:   Originally Posted by CrustyMac:

Try "Couch Potato Christians" as an example.

Thank you, Crusty. I thought the same thing but didn't say it because Bill chooses to play his games when we "show" him or "proves" something when he ask for it.  A week ago he asked me to prove to him that he puts words in people's mouth. I did & he hasn't bothered to respond to it because he can't without looking stupid.

Hi Chick and Crusty,

 

How is that judging anyone or being nasty?  It is a true fact that many Christians do not like to go out and evangelize.   Even they will call themselves the same.  That is a descriptive name, not a derogatory name.

 

I have even seen many pastors who refuse to do visitations.  To me, that is a major part of a pastor's job -- yet, I have met many who will not do this.  Am I being mean if I call this pastor a "Couch Potato Pastor"?   No.  Not really.  All he has to do is to get off his duff, off his couch, and go out to do visitations. 

 

No, my Friends, this is not a derogatory name -- only descriptive.  It is sort of like describing those six strong men who will carry a person into the church for, most often, the first time.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:
Hi Chick and Crusty,

 

How is that judging anyone or being nasty?  It is a true fact that many Christians do not like to go out and evangelize.   Even they will call themselves the same.  That is a descriptive name, not a derogatory name.

I have even seen many pastors who refuse to do visitations.  To me, that is a major part of a pastor's job -- yet, I have met many who will not do this.  Am I being mean if I call this pastor a "Couch Potato Pastor"?   No.  Not really.  All he has to do is to get off his duff, off his couch, and go out to do visitations. 

No, my Friends, this is not a derogatory name -- only descriptive.  It is sort of like describing those six strong men who will carry a person into the church for, most often, the first time.

Bill

          ************************************************************

You either just play dumb or just refuse to get what many on here have tried to tell you. But you will answer for your kind of Christianity one day. I think you're one of those that would be happy just barely sliding into Heaven........if you make it at all.

The major part of a Christians job is to show love/compassion. You are one of very few that I've met or come across that doesn't have it in you. It's really very sad.

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

---

That still makes absolutely no sense.

Here we have a man that, to "help" his followers attain immortality.  He doesn't want to threaten them with violence himself so he tella a parable and lets the charaxcter in the parable do the telling for him.

That;s just stupid, Bill.  Anyone but the most deluded can see through that ruse.  

 

True, Jesus did not say those words himself, he was realying the words of a character.  But the end result is the same: Jesus was not the morally upright citizen you fundy's describe.  We was a chicken **it man who issued threats from behind "parables.

Hell didn't really exist for the Jews until Jesus came along and introduced his loving followers to the threat  that anyone who didn't fololow him will be  

 

Mark 9:43 Jesus says,  "If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter into life maimed than with two hands to go into Gehenna (translated as Hell), into the unquenchable fire."

So threats of the most violent kind imaginable were the tools of the trade for this "loving" monster that man created to punish those who don't tow the line.  It's the same story in almost all religions.

I do not "choose" to be cast into the lake of fire.  I choose to THINK. Something that is not possible with you Jesus freaks. 

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:
quote:   Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
quote:   Originally Posted by CrustyMac:

Try "Couch Potato Christians" as an example.

Thank you, Crusty. I thought the same thing but didn't say it because Bill chooses to play his games when we "show" him or "proves" something when he ask for it.  A week ago he asked me to prove to him that he puts words in people's mouth. I did & he hasn't bothered to respond to it because he can't without looking stupid.

Hi Chick and Crusty,

 

How is that judging anyone or being nasty?  It is a true fact that many Christians do not like to go out and evangelize.   Even they will call themselves the same.  That is a descriptive name, not a derogatory name.

 

I have even seen many pastors who refuse to do visitations.  To me, that is a major part of a pastor's job -- yet, I have met many who will not do this.  Am I being mean if I call this pastor a "Couch Potato Pastor"?   No.  Not really.  All he has to do is to get off his duff, off his couch, and go out to do visitations. 

 

No, my Friends, this is not a derogatory name -- only descriptive.  It is sort of like describing those six strong men who will carry a person into the church for, most often, the first time.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Yes, Bill.  It is a label.  Labels are demeaning.  When I call you an egotistical blowhard, that is demeaning.  But if you feel it is merely descriptive, good for you.

quote:    Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
Yes, Bill.  It is a label.  Labels are demeaning.  When I call you an egotistical blowhard, that is demeaning.  But if you feel it is merely descriptive, good for you.

Hi Crusty,

 

"Male" is also a label.  Am I demeaning you if I call you a "male"?    "Man" is a label.  Are you a "man"?   I realize I cannot call you a Christian -- for you have NEVER given me any indication that you are a Christian.

 

However, one thing you have proven -- and that is that you have no idea how to participate in a civil discussion.   Any time anyone disagrees with you -- the demeaning names begin to fly.   So, I suppose that speaks to your ability, or inability, to carry an intelligent dialogue.

 

But, Crusty, I guess we all have to live within the limitations of our God-given abilities.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Hi Crusty,

 

I realize I cannot call you a Christian -- for you have NEVER given me any indication that you are a Christian.

 

However, one thing you have proven -- and that is that you have no idea how to participate in a civil discussion.   Any time anyone disagrees with you -- the demeaning names begin to fly.   So, I suppose that speaks to your ability, or inability, to carry an intelligent dialogue.

 

But, Crusty, I guess we all have to live within the limitations of our God-given abilities.

Bill

          *********************************************************************

And you truly think most of us here consider YOU a Christian? Beyond your calling yourself one, & your love of judging us, you have NEVER given us any indication that you are truly a Christian.

 

You accuse Crusty of not knowing how to participate in a civil discussion? Look at any of your post, especially when anyone disagrees with you, which is most of the time.

Kinda like the pot calling the kettle black, ain't it?

 

 

 

 

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:
quote:    Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
Yes, Bill.  It is a label.  Labels are demeaning.  When I call you an egotistical blowhard, that is demeaning.  But if you feel it is merely descriptive, good for you.

Hi Crusty,

 

"Male" is also a label.  Am I demeaning you if I call you a "male"?    "Man" is a label.  Are you a "man"?   I realize I cannot call you a Christian -- for you have NEVER given me any indication that you are a Christian.

 

However, one thing you have proven -- and that is that you have no idea how to participate in a civil discussion.   Any time anyone disagrees with you -- the demeaning names begin to fly.   So, I suppose that speaks to your ability, or inability, to carry an intelligent dialogue.

 

But, Crusty, I guess we all have to live within the limitations of our God-given abilities.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Ummmm..... Bill, demeaning or not?  I see - if you label someone it is not demeaning.  If I label someone it is.  Okay.  If that is how you "participate in civil discussion", I don't think I can lower myself back to adolescence to participate with you.  I really don't care what a 13 year old thinks of me or calls me.

 

Have another blissful day, Bill.

The Peaceful Message Of The New Testament?


A typical claim that many Christians are fond of making is that while the Old Testament contains many verses commanding God's followers to smite and slay his enemies, the New Testament doesn't contain anything that advocates this sort of thing.

The New Testament is the "good" news for humanity and serves as a model for how humans should behave toward their fellow man. The New Testament doesn't contain the harsh rhetoric found in the Old Testament.

Christian assertion:
No person can possibly quote from the words of Jesus or the New Testament and rightly justify doing the same things endorsed in the Old Testament with regard to destroying various groups of people.
The New Testament doesn't say anything that can be construed to mean anything close to the commands given in the Old Testament Book of Deuteronomy or Joshua.

Commentary:
Believers who put forth this nonsense need to take off the sanitized mask of the New Testament that is so often used to deceive children in Bible study classes.
Christianity has carefully cultivated and ingrained the "sweet" Jesus image on society, primarily aiming this form of propaganda at young children through the use of chants, colorful Bible story books, and assorted other gimmicks, as part of its indoctrination procedure.
The New Testament, although well masked, is just as intolerant as the Old Testament, and the dark side of Jesus and the Christian doctrine casts a long shadow throughout the New Testament and history as well.
While the New Testament does contain "love thy neighbor" sayings, it also exhibits the same smite and destroy rhetoric found in the Old Testament.
Peel away the fluffy portions of Jesus and an intolerant religious zealot is exposed.

The Biblical character called Jesus demands complete submission and tolerates no other opinions.

Matt 12:30
He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.

Jesus made it quite clear that anyone who offends him would be violently destroyed.

Matt 13:40-42
As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all
things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.


History has shown that conducting scourges in order to usher in and help the plans of Jesus are easy to justify.
Anyone who displeases the Lord Jesus will and should be destroyed.
The burning of heretics was easy to justify by believers who wanted to help their Lord Jesus with his plans.

Threats were often present in the teachings of Jesus, revealing the intolerant and bullying nature of this "savior".
Anyone who doesn't believe in the new savior called "Jesus" will have the wrath of God on them.

http://agnosticreview.com/peaceful.htm

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×