Skip to main content

The perverse, hateful, and warped theology of Phil Robertson: Convert Muslims of kill them.

 

http://thinkprogress.org/home/...k-dynasty-bible-isis  

 

Hey, Phil, I thought that was what ISIS was about: convert or we will shoot, hang, or behead you.

Are you throwing in with the extreme Islamists by adopting THEIR modality?

 

View the clip and tell us why Sean (Blabbermouth) Hannity didn't take issue with Phil's extremism. Sean just seemed to let it slide. Ah, well, what should we expect from such a creepy ideologue as Hannity shows himself to be?

 

I yam what I yam and that's all I yam--but it is enough!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Unfortunately, those of ISIS and the other radical Islamists, which are legion, may only be countered by a sea change -- either by dead or their hearts.  Experience doesn't present many other choices.  I'm at the point that if queried about the Crusaders,my only regret is they did not succeed in their wars of liberation.

For a handbook on how to treat death cults in the Middle East, simply study the Romans actions in the Second Punic War. against Carthage.  In my memory, archaeologists pooh-poohed the idea of Carthaginians throwing their babies into the maw of Ba'al to be consumed in the furnace as Roman propaganda.  Then, later, they dug up the charred bones of babies.

Originally Posted by David L.:

Yeah, his philosophy is the same as ISIS - convert to my religion or die!


This is an example of how weak minded our country has become.   If they don't convert, then their life purpose is to destroy our country, one head at a time.  What choice do we really have.  We kill them or they kill us, that is the only choice.  How weak minded do you have to be to not see what they will do if not eliminated?

Originally Posted by Mr. Hooberbloob:
This is an example of how weak minded our country has become.   If they don't convert, then their life purpose is to destroy our country, one head at a time.  What choice do we really have.  We kill them or they kill us, that is the only choice.  How weak minded do you have to be to not see what they will do if not eliminated?

___________

 

 

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
Originally Posted by Mr. Hooberbloob:
This is an example of how weak minded our country has become.   If they don't convert, then their life purpose is to destroy our country, one head at a time.  What choice do we really have.  We kill them or they kill us, that is the only choice.  How weak minded do you have to be to not see what they will do if not eliminated?

___________

 

 

______

And just HOW do we go about the effort to "kill them"?  Radical Islam is so geographically widespread and its operatives are so mingled with other populations that ferreting out and killing them is an impossible objective. So, then, what IS the STRATEGY for finding them and presenting each one with the alternative of "convert or be killed"?  The President is attacked for saying that we do not yet have a strategy for dealing with ISIS. How much more so, then, would we need a strategy for exterminating not only ISIS but all other militant extremist Islamist organizations?

 

Suggestions welcome from both weak minded and strong minded.

Last edited by Contendah

First of all when is the last time Obama used the word Radical Islam or War on Terrorism?  He has declared the war over and thinks that means it is.  He believes this is a law enforcement issue.  Right now this administration  is gutting the military to WWI levels. 

 

Now as for what I would do.  Good old fashion intelligence.  Lead the world on this issue and form a collation.  Obama likes to "lead from behind".  Arm the Kurds and find allies with the moderate Shiites.  Paralyze them from the air and wipe them out using American commanders and elite soldiers embedded with the Kurds.  

 

Obama needs to grow a pair and stop being a weak,indecisive feckless, coward.    He has no problem deploying illegal and unconstitutional methods and cheap tricks to go after republicans but thinks terrorism is a "manageable" law enforcement issue. 

 

 

Last edited by Chuck Farley

Despite what you may thinkof Phil Robertson, at least you know where you stand with him. He does not mince his words, nor does he regret telling you what he thinks if you ASK him.  Someone asked him what he thought and he gave them his opinion.  Nothing wrong with it.  Phil Robertson has more backbone and integety than anyone currently in office, either Repub or Democrat, and contributes more to society than alot of the folks who get on here complaining about him, and that includes the original poster who should be the poster child for worthlessness.

And DAvid, show me where Phil Robertson EVER made an assinine comment like the one you referenced. He has never said it.  He even made the statement that he loved everyone, despite their sinful ways.  Just because he disagrees with a lifestyle choice does not mean he wants to kill you, like the Islamic brotherhood you mention.  Just google or go to LiveLeaks and watch some of the more atrocious acts perpetrated by this bunch who call themselves religious, but do not make the mistake of calling them Chrisitians, because they neither claim to be, nor act in that manner. Chistians follow the doctrine portrayed by Christ Jesus, not Mohammed.

Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
Originally Posted by Mr. Hooberbloob:
This is an example of how weak minded our country has become.   If they don't convert, then their life purpose is to destroy our country, one head at a time.  What choice do we really have.  We kill them or they kill us, that is the only choice.  How weak minded do you have to be to not see what they will do if not eliminated?

___________

 

 

______

And just HOW do we go about the effort to "kill them"?  Radical Islam is so geographically widespread and its operatives are so mingled with other populations that ferreting out and killing them is an impossible objective. So, then, what IS the STRATEGY for finding them and presenting each one with the alternative of "convert or be killed"?  The President is attacked for saying that we do not yet have a strategy for dealing with ISIS. How much more so, then, would we need a strategy for exterminating not only ISIS but all other militant extremist Islamist organizations?

 

Suggestions welcome from both weak minded and strong minded.


We look directly into our enemy's playbook.  Their plan is to spread Islam to every corner of the world.  We should do the same thing, with Christianity. 

 

There is a huge void in this country that if not filled the Christianity it will be filled by islam.  Islam is actively recruiting in this country.  The fact that we have a president named "Barack" shows how absolutely stupid voters in this country are.  He requires any symbols resembling a cross to be covered up yet celebrates islamic holidays.  Islam is alive and well within our government already and has a strong foothold.  Our liberal/politically correct minded citizens/politicians will do nothing to stop it and everything to help it, regardless of their own consciousness of this situation. 

 

Muslims know our weakness and they have no problem exploiting them.  We know their weakness, but choose to pretend they are mostly peaceful.  Our leaders are weak and don't have the backbone to do the non politically correct thing as they might offend a small percentage of our population.  In other words, we're screwed.

Last edited by Mr. Hooberbloob

Paul Harvey, 1964.  (and yes I did Snopes this)

 

Does any of this sound familiar?

 

If I Were the Devil

If I were the Prince of Darkness I would want to  engulf the whole earth in darkness.

I'd have a third of its real estate  and four-fifths of its population, but I would not be happy until I had seized  the ripest apple on the tree.

So I should set about however necessary, to  take over the United States.

I would begin with a campaign of whispers. 

With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whispers to you as I whispered to  Eve, "Do as you please."

To the young I would whisper "The Bible is a  myth." I would convince them that "man created God," instead of the other way  around. I would confide that "what is bad is good and what is good is square."

In the ears of the young married I would whisper that work is debasing,  that cocktail parties are good for you.  I would caution them not to be  "extreme" in religion, in patriotism, in moral conduct.

And the old I  would teach to pray — to say after me — "Our father which are in Washington."

Then I'd get organized.

I'd educate authors in how to make lurid  literature exciting so that anything else would appear dull, uninteresting.

I'd threaten TV with dirtier movies, and vice-versa.

I'd  infiltrate unions and urge more loafing, less work. Idle hands usually work for  me.

I'd peddle narcotics to whom I could, I'd sell alcohol to ladies and  gentlemen of distinction, I'd tranquilize the rest with pills.

If I were  the Devil, I would encourage schools to refine young intellects, but neglect to  discipline emotions; let those run wild.

I'd designate an atheist to  front for me before the highest courts and I'd get preachers to say, "She's  right."

With flattery and promises of power I would get the courts to  vote against God and in favor of ****ography. 

Thus I would evict God  from the courthouse, then from the schoolhouse, then from the Houses of  Congress.

Then in his own churches I'd substitute psychology for religion  and deify science.

If I were Satan I'd make the symbol of Easter an egg

And the symbol of Christmas a bottle.

If I were the Devil I'd  take from those who have and give to those who wanted until I had killed the  incentive of the ambitious. Then my police state would force everybody back to  work.

Then I would separate families, putting children in uniform, women  in coal mines and objectors in slave-labor camps.

If I were Satan I'd  just keep doing what I'm doing and the whole world go to hell as sure as the  Devil.

I am all for wiping out the ISIS scum! They are evil and beyond reproach. The religion part is the comment I have a problem with. Religion has caused more wars, suffering and hatred in the world than anything else. If they want to end the evil and hate in the world, then the last thing they need to do is promote religion.

Originally Posted by David L.:

I am all for wiping out the ISIS scum! They are evil and beyond reproach. The religion part is the comment I have a problem with. Religion has caused more wars, suffering and hatred in the world than anything else. If they want to end the evil and hate in the world, then the last thing they need to do is promote religion.


You ready to end sex and money because they've started many a war as well.  How much suffering has AIDS wrought?  Who is the highest risk group for this disease?  Christianity is not a religion of hate, liberalism corners that market.

Originally Posted by David L.:

Idiotic ramblings as usual and I love how you always have to bring up my sexuality, no matter what subject matter the post may be.

 

 

What?

Your "sexuality" is of no concern of mine.

Do what you need to do.

You seem to be the one who brings up your..."sexuality"...

I don't condemn you?

I don't fault you?

If you are so comfortable....then WHY this Militant speech????

 

 

Originally Posted by Contendah:

The perverse, hateful, and warped theology of Phil Robertson: Convert Muslims of kill them.

 

http://thinkprogress.org/home/...k-dynasty-bible-isis  

 

Hey, Phil, I thought that was what ISIS was about: convert or we will shoot, hang, or behead you.

Are you throwing in with the extreme Islamists by adopting THEIR modality?

 

View the clip and tell us why Sean (Blabbermouth) Hannity didn't take issue with Phil's extremism. Sean just seemed to let it slide. Ah, well, what should we expect from such a creepy ideologue as Hannity shows himself to be?

 

===============

They certainly aren't going to convert, so just what would YOU  do with them? Would you say keep doing what we are already doing with some of them, bringing them here and supporting/educating them with government money until the day they strap on a bomb and let it go in a crowd, and then keep the rest of their family here like nothing happened, supporting them?

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by Contendah:

The perverse, hateful, and warped theology of Phil Robertson: Convert Muslims of kill them.

 

http://thinkprogress.org/home/...k-dynasty-bible-isis  

 

Hey, Phil, I thought that was what ISIS was about: convert or we will shoot, hang, or behead you.

Are you throwing in with the extreme Islamists by adopting THEIR modality?

 

View the clip and tell us why Sean (Blabbermouth) Hannity didn't take issue with Phil's extremism. Sean just seemed to let it slide. Ah, well, what should we expect from such a creepy ideologue as Hannity shows himself to be?

 

===============

They certainly aren't going to convert, so just what would YOU  do with them? Would you say keep doing what we are already doing with some of them, bringing them here and supporting/educating them with government money until the day they strap on a bomb and let it go in a crowd, and then keep the rest of their family here like nothing happened, supporting them?

===========
Move them into contendah's neighborhood. Put their children in school with contendah's grandchildren. Tax contendah a little extra to support them.

 

Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:

On a side note they should revoke this guys citizenship and convict him of Treason !1! and anyone like him !!

http://news.yahoo.com/the-amer...-isil-141618316.html

-------------------------

Amazing to me that the thread contendah made addresses what Robertson said, and vilifies all in the area when it was said, but something like this man is NEVER mentioned by him or anyone on the left, and I have never seen contendah outraged because the lefties didn't call another leftie on the vile they spew.

Last edited by Bestworking

That this could happen, and most likely IS happening, doesn't seem to bother the left at all. I posted a thread along the same lines a couple of weeks ago and all they wanted to do was attack the ones proposing such things could happen. Freaking amazing.  And you call Robertson vile names. Again, freaking amazing.

========================================

*Stunt*

 

http://www.inquisitr.com/14544...to-get-into-america/

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:

On a side note they should revoke this guys citizenship and convict him of Treason !1! and anyone like him !!

http://news.yahoo.com/the-amer...-isil-141618316.html

-------------------------

Amazing to me that the thread contendah made addresses what Robertson said, and vilifies all in the area when it was said, but something like this man is NEVER mentioned by him or anyone on the left, and I have never seen contendah outraged because the lefties didn't call another leftie on the vile they spew.

________

"vilifies all in the area"---WHa-a-at in thunder are you talking about?

"vilifies all in the area"---WHa-a-at in thunder are you talking about?

--------------------------

View the clip and tell us why Sean (Blabbermouth) Hannity didn't take issue with Phil's extremism. Sean just seemed to let it slide. Ah, well, what should we expect from such a creepy ideologue as Hannity shows himself to be?

----------------------------------------------

Really? You really don't get it? I'm talking about the double standard, how you and other lefties run everyone in the area down when something is said that puts your undies in a wad, because you think they should have said or done something, but you have no problem with the left spewing  their vile speech and ignorant statements and never being called on it. It's just the opposite, the 'hosts' nod and grin in agreement.

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

"vilifies all in the area"---WHa-a-at in thunder are you talking about?

--------------------------

View the clip and tell us why Sean (Blabbermouth) Hannity didn't take issue with Phil's extremism. Sean just seemed to let it slide. Ah, well, what should we expect from such a creepy ideologue as Hannity shows himself to be?

----------------------------------------------

Really? You really don't get it? I'm talking about the double standard, how you and other lefties run everyone in the area down when something is said that puts your undies in a wad, because you think they should have said or done something, but you have no problem with the left spewing  their vile speech and ignorant statements and never being called on it. It's just the opposite, the 'hosts' nod and grin in agreement.

__

Thus your vague "everyone in the area" remains undefined.

I just wish that we would quit glorifying the redneck culture (like the duck people, Honey Boo Boo, etc), along with whatever mindset it takes to glorify the tv shows about housewifes, and Kadarsians. Not even sure what to call that bunch.

I wish the History channel would get back to "history" , while I'm on a rant.

Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

"vilifies all in the area"---WHa-a-at in thunder are you talking about?

--------------------------

View the clip and tell us why Sean (Blabbermouth) Hannity didn't take issue with Phil's extremism. Sean just seemed to let it slide. Ah, well, what should we expect from such a creepy ideologue as Hannity shows himself to be?

----------------------------------------------

Really? You really don't get it? I'm talking about the double standard, how you and other lefties run everyone in the area down when something is said that puts your undies in a wad, because you think they should have said or done something, but you have no problem with the left spewing  their vile speech and ignorant statements and never being called on it. It's just the opposite, the 'hosts' nod and grin in agreement.

__

Thus your vague "everyone in the area" remains undefined.

-------------------------

Vague? I think you need to clear the cobwebs out of your head. I clearly meant anyone around when the statement was made. YOU mentioned Hannity and seemed to think it was his place to 'jump' on/censor Robertson. You think that goes for anyone (on the right) expressing an opinion.

Last edited by Bestworking

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×