Skip to main content

Originally Posted by lexum:

just take Gods word for it best. why do you think God presented the Bible in simple terms?

 

can you imagine what the world would be like without the Bible. for one thing there would be no great music or art.

---------------

The bible has nothing at all to do with the music and art or anything else, and the "world" would be a much better place without it. Since there is no god there is no reason to "take" "his" word for anything.

Best someone once said “we step but we do not step into the same river twice”

   Science is just that same way best, it is always flowing and changing. It is never the same but the word of God is the same whenever you step in it. It was so carefully laid out that way.

    I think it was my friend Aristotle who said:

"two mutually exclusive statements cannot both be true." . The word of God is always true ; science is not. Could they both be false? yes. But the word of God has never been found false and they both cannot be true.

Best we can say that whatever is to ‘become’ is mutually exclusive with what ‘is‘. What is said to be true in science will be mutually exclusive with what it ‘becomes‘, they both can be wrong  but both cannot be true.  Any science that ‘is‘, will ‘become‘, because any observation of science is space-time dependent.

    Nature was spoken in to existence by God and the act recorded as his word. They are the same and do not ‘become’. They are not mutually exclusive and are truth.

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_443130.html

What about this story from November 2001, of a cockroach which is supposedly 300 million years old, but looks exactly like the ones we know of today! And there is one more thing, usually "extremely old" items cannot be preserved without shell or bone, as this article points out, but strangely, this insect's frailest parts have been utterly preserved. Even veins in the wings can be seen. Now you have to wonder about this one, folks. We have buildings that don't last hundreds of years without serious breakdown. We are supposed to accept that this frail dead insect carcass has been around not hundreds, not thousands, or even just one million years, but 300 million years?! You have got to be kidding.

Originally Posted by Not Shallow Not Slim:

      The Fail of this post is embarrassing.



 

DF



-------------------
lexum-rramlimmn lacks the cognitive brain function that most humans have that enables them to become embarrassed.  If he had it he would have crawled off to a hole in the ground and died 3 or 4 years ago. If you've ever been in a nursing home and witnessed an old guy in the corner drooling on himself and mumbling random nonsense about science it was probably him.  I honestly don't know how he takes care of himself in the real world. His poor wife must be exhausted.

What’s your claim -to-fame commie?

   I told you that you are getting on this nerve. Go play with jimimii. I doubt if your IQ is over 40 so show respect to us with triple digit IQ’s.  it won’t break your jaw to call me Mr. Lexum

 

   you are going to keep on and end up in the penitentiary

jimbo suck this up you may possibly be from one of these cycles and accidentally poked through a time warp. it could explain why you are a nut job.

Cremo, Michael A. (1994) "Puranic Time and the Archeological Record." World Archaeological Congress 3, New Delhi, India. Published as chapter 3 in Time and Archaeology: Vol. 37, One World Archaeology Series, edited by Tim Murray, Routledge, London (1999)

Abstract

The time concept of modern archeology, and modern anthropology in general, resembles the general cosmological-historical time concept of Europe's Judeo-Christian culture. Differing from the cyclical cosmological-historical time concepts of the early Greeks in Europe, and the Indians and others in Asia, the Judeo-Christian cosmological-historical time concept is linear and progressive. Modern archeology also shares with Judeo-Christian theology the idea that humans appear after the other major species. The author subjectively positions himself within the Vaishnava Hindu world view, and from this perspective offers a radical critique of modern generalizations about human origins and antiquity. Hindu historical literatures, particularly the Puranas and Itihasas, place human existence in the context of repeating time cycles called yugas and kalpas, lasting hundreds of millions of years. During this entire time, according to the Puranic accounts, humans coexisted with creatures in some ways resembling the earlier toolmaking hominids of modern evolutionary accounts. If one were to take the Puranic record as objectively true, and also take into account the generally admitted imperfection and complexity of the archeological and anthropological record, one could make the following prediction. The strata of the earth, extending back hundreds of millions of years, should yield a bewildering mixture of hominid bones, some anatomically modern human and some not, as well as a similarly bewildering variety of artifacts, some displaying a high level of artistry and others not. Given the linear progressivist preconceptions of generations of archeologists and anthropologists, one could also predict that this mixture of bones and artifacts would be edited to conform to their deeply rooted linear-progressive time concepts. A careful study of the archeological record, and the history of archeology itself, broadly confirms these two predictions. Linear-progressivist time concepts thus pose a substantial barrier to truly objective evaluation of the archeological record and to rational theory- building in the area of human origins and antiquity.

The copy paste troll strikes yet again! Passing it off as something he's somehow involved in. Your life must be really boring and dull for you to have to resort to this daily. What's your excuse rramlimnn? Did you just come into the world a stupid idiot or have you been working on it for some time now? Maybe your mom dropped you on your head?

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×