quote:
I just discovered this lovely little article published in the "Seattle Weekly", June 21, 2000, about the NRA - thought it might be of interest.

The NRA contends it doesn't care who gets the training, a gun owner is a gun owner. "We don't ask gender or gender preference," says NRA spokesman Jim Manown when asked about gay membership in the organization. "Personally, I run into all sorts of individuals." The rub is that many gays and lesbians might never feel totally comfortable with an organization whose political supporters include a lot of right-wing homophobes. Thus, Cease Fear acts as a bridge between the two communities, promoting safety and gun ownership without the baggage of the NRA.

But with or without the NRA, some gays are decidedly pro-gun—or at least pro-self-defense. A recent article on Salon, Jonathan Rauch, makes the case for gays being armed. In response to mounting hate crimes and gay-bashing incidents, Rauch argues that guns not only can protect gays, but transform them, just as self-defense has empowered Jews. "Guns can do the same thing for homosexuals: emancipate them from their image—often internalized—of cringing weakness. I'll warrant that this would do far more for the self-esteem of the next generation of gay men and women than any number of hate crime laws or antidiscrimination statutes."

Rauch writes, "Let's make gay bashing dangerous."




Make it DANGEROUS? What are you advocating now?

Is this a veiled threat?
quote:
Originally posted by jetboy:
quote:
I have absolutely no problem with the 2nd Amendment. If an individual feels threatened by some rednec,abusive, homophobe, rascist, moron who may harm them - I strongly support carrying a hand gun for personal PROTECTION. To many people think its their privilege to physically assault individuals who they don't like. NO ONE should have to live in fear, but if you do, take control of the situation and protect yourself. I absolutely advocate using firearms for personal protection - no question.



Racist??? I agree you need to add something, for you don't have a case otherwise.


BTW; no one has to sit idely by and let homosexuals make sexual advances toward you in public places, or anywhere else for that matter. You wont need a gun though, they run at a big BOO Hew Haw HAWw! Razzer


Same with women getting unwanted attention from men. All you have to do is say "NO". Its really simple. You may not, according to the law, assault someone who makes an unwanted sexual advance towards anyone. Assault is assault - period. And I hate to tell ya - I do have a case. Wink
Last edited by meanasasnake
quote:
Originally posted by jetboy:
quote:
I just discovered this lovely little article published in the "Seattle Weekly", June 21, 2000, about the NRA - thought it might be of interest.

The NRA contends it doesn't care who gets the training, a gun owner is a gun owner. "We don't ask gender or gender preference," says NRA spokesman Jim Manown when asked about gay membership in the organization. "Personally, I run into all sorts of individuals." The rub is that many gays and lesbians might never feel totally comfortable with an organization whose political supporters include a lot of right-wing homophobes. Thus, Cease Fear acts as a bridge between the two communities, promoting safety and gun ownership without the baggage of the NRA.

But with or without the NRA, some gays are decidedly pro-gun—or at least pro-self-defense. A recent article on Salon, Jonathan Rauch, makes the case for gays being armed. In response to mounting hate crimes and gay-bashing incidents, Rauch argues that guns not only can protect gays, but transform them, just as self-defense has empowered Jews. "Guns can do the same thing for homosexuals: emancipate them from their image—often internalized—of cringing weakness. I'll warrant that this would do far more for the self-esteem of the next generation of gay men and women than any number of hate crime laws or antidiscrimination statutes."

Rauch writes, "Let's make gay bashing dangerous."




Make it DANGEROUS? What are you advocating now?

Is this a veiled threat?


Make it dangerous to assault someone - yes, I advocate personal protection. Absolutely. That is not a threat at all, and it is certainly not "veiled". I am simply saying protect yourself from assault. Legal gun ownership for personal protection is a right in this nation. Big Grin
quote:
Make it dangerous to assault someone - yes, I advocate personal protection. Absolutely.


Thats the way of cowards, wont stand behind what they say. Roll Eyes
Ahh....dissembling, rambling and trying to justify a violent nature.

My remarks have been consistant from the beginning. I TOTALLY support ANYONE who chooses to use a firearm for personl protection. Let me repeat Mr Rausch's remark: "Let's make gay bashing dangerous." Lets also make these crimes dangerous :rape, home invasion, car jacking among other violent crimes. Razzer
quote:
Ahh....dissembling, rambling and trying to justify a violent nature.

My remarks have been consistant from the beginning. I TOTALLY support ANYONE who chooses to use a firearm for personl protection. Let me repeat Mr Rausch's remark: "Let's make gay bashing dangerous." Lets also make these crimes dangerous :rape, home invasion, car jacking among other violent crimes.



LOL you want to shoot everyone dont you? Not too bad for a non-violent person, just be sure you dont kick anyones ass along the way LOL
No, I have no desire to shoot anyone. But as I have said, I totally support the right of Americans under the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution, to own firearms for personal protection. Not everyone is capable of fending off a physical assault. Sometimes one needs an "equalizer". It almost seems that someone is defending crime. "Oh no, lets not defend ourselves against crime! Someone might get hurt!" Ahahahahahahahahahahahah! Big Grin
If someone assaulted me I would assume they meant me harm. How is a person supposed to know if the assault will just stop with a "kick"? Would be sort of hard to know. If indeed it did just amount to a "kick" - I would call the cops and have the individual arrested on the spot. If the suspect fled, I would get his tag number and turn him in if I could. You just don't get it do you? You just DO NOT ASSAULT PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE THEM. Assault is an illegal act - PERIOD. I really don't care how you try and justify your violent tendencies. It is indefensible. If an individual feels threatened and fears assault, YES, they should defend themselves accordingly. You really need to stop trying to justify violent behavior.
quote:
You just DO NOT ASSAULT PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE THEM.



nope, another of your distortions. I kicked the TWO males because they made sexual advances toward me. Kind of like a decent woman slapping a man for unwanted sexual advances. Just shoot 'em all I guess is your answer. Let them put their hands all over you, oh wait, is that the abuse you keep speaking of?
Having been a social worker for over 25 years, I have worked with many, many homosexuals over the years. I can ,in all honesty ,say that I would prefer their company to yours any day.

You have changed your story several times now. I don't believe anything you say at this point. I would STILL suggest that instead of assaulting anyone I would say "NO" and leave. I have filed all your remarks and plan to archive them to disk. Your remarks have a violent, threatening tone that could indicate intent to do harm. The terms of use in this forum allow for criminal investigation.
quote:
If someone assaulted me I would assume they meant me harm. How is a person supposed to know if the assault will just stop with a "kick"? Would be sort of hard to know. If indeed it did just amount to a "kick" - I would call the cops and have the individual arrested on the spot. If the suspect fled, I would get his tag number and turn him in if I could. You just don't get it do you? You just DO NOT ASSAULT PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE THEM. Assault is an illegal act - PERIOD. I really don't care how you try and justify your violent tendencies. It is indefensible. If an individual feels threatened and fears assault, YES, they should defend themselves accordingly. You really need to stop trying to justify violent behavior.



you know, I would really like to know, on what grounds do you think you should be telling me how I treat people that make sexual advances toward me? What business is it of yours? You seem to love homosexuals a lot. Does a straight person not have the right to be left alone?
quote:
Having been a social worker for over 25 years, I have worked with many, many homosexuals over the years. I can ,in all honesty ,say that I would prefer their company to yours any day.


I don't doubt that one bit. Says more about you than it does me.


quote:
You have changed your story several times now. I don't believe anything you say at this point. I would STILL suggest that instead of assaulting anyone I would say "NO" and leave. I have filed all your remarks and plan to archive them to disk. Your remarks have a violent, threatening tone that could indicate intent to do harm. The terms of use in this forum allow for criminal investigation.


I haven't changed my story at all, you however have tried to change it.

As for the rest of your THREAT, LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL


If they need my name and address tell them to PM me LOL
EVERYONE has the right to be left alone. All you have to do is say "no". Its that simple. If you resort to violence - you get what you deserve.

Over the years I have known some pretty nasty straight people. Everything you can imagine on earth. Women who beat their kids, husbands who beat their wives, murderers, rapists, thieves - you name it. I have no tolerance for cruelty and violence. It cannot be tolerated. Gay people are by far not the worst thing to come down the pike. Your aversion is your problem - not mine.
quote:
Originally posted by jetboy:
quote:
But honestly now, e has a valid point....what is it about you that you think would be a "turn on" to gay men?



everything about me, I am just lovable. i like gay men, gay men like me, not one thing you can do about it , meanasasnake, err I mean NotFeelingSaf...


My my my....how we have done a turnaround from page 2 to page 4.....ya know jetboy, or whoever you are this week.... sounds to me like you just plain like to try to piss people off. You don't seem to be able to have a "legitimate" position on anything....expecially "gays". So what was the real deal with the guys you ....shall we say, just to be nice, "rejected"? They weren't your type? or maybe you just didn't want a "threesome"? Whatever....doesn't matter to me one way or the other but I am offering the questions for your own personal insight....which you obviously need but will, of course, deny. But there is one truth that not even you can deny....it "feels" a lot better to make friends than it does to make enemies. Of course you can always come back with "not to me, because I don't care" but if you are "human", and I suspect that underneath all that bull you are, it really does "feel" better.
P.S.
I'm not "meanasasnake" ...but I can be when I need to be....lol
These statistics are for consideration by anyone.

Having used IV drugs and less than 25 years of age ..... 16%3 (of the homosexual community) ..... 1.5% (of the general community) ..... 11 times the prevalence
Engaged in prostitution ..... 24% 3 (of the homosexual community) ..... 0.66% 4 ..... (of the general community) ..... 36 times the prevalence
For transvestites, the figure is 45% 3 engaged in prostitution
Having a lifetime STDs prevalence ..... 70% 3 (of the homosexual community) ..... 4% (of the general community) ..... 18 times the prevalence
Percentage alcoholism ..... 27% 3 (of the homosexual community) ..... 11% 5 (of the general community) ..... 2.5 times the prevalence
Median number of partners ..... 38 per year
Having a brief or no knowledge of partners ..... 90% 4
Involved in whipping, sadism or masochism ..... 21% 3 (of the homosexual community) Sadism and 'anti-violence' (1997 Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras, page 99) are somewhat incongruous.
Of those with HIV, having anogenital warts ..... 92%
Of those not having HIV and having anogenital warts ..... 76% 3
Acquired multiple wart virus subtypes, within 17 months ..... 75% 3 (of the homosexual community)
Involved in 'rimming' (mouth to anus contact) .....61% 3 (of the homosexual community)
Having anal pre-cancer ..... 18.0% (of the homosexual community) .... 0.03% 8 (of the general community) ..... 650 times the prevalence
Having HIV ( < 25 years 10%, > 25 years 24% ) ..... 21.8% 3 (of the homosexual community)
Average age of death from AIDS ..... 35.7 years
Expected average life span ..... 45 years (of the homosexual community) ..... 70 years 10 (of the general community)

References:
3 Sydney Men And Sexual Health (SMASH) Study, 1995, Volume B2, Australian Society of HIV Medicine.
4 International Social Science Program (ISSP), Component of the National Social Science Survey (NSSS), of the Social Sciences Data Archives (SSDA), at the Australian National University (ANU). Family Life Survey 1989-90.
5 Statistics on Drug Abuse in Australia in 1994. Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health. AGPS, ISSN 0817 - 3575.
6 Kippax S. (1995) Predictors of unprotected male-to-male anal intercourse with casual partners in a national sample. Australian Journal of Public Health 19:2:132.
7 Kiviat 1993 as reported in Mindel 1995, Human Papilloma Virus Edward Arnold. p70.
8 Melbye M. (1994) High incidence of anal cancer among AIDS patients. Lancet. 343 (I) :636.
9 Gold J., Yeuming L., Kaldor J. (?1994) Premature Mortality in Australia 1983 -1992; The first decade of the AIDS Epidemic.
10 Australian Social Trends 1995 ABS Canberra.

News report from the Sydney Star Observer 25 Feb 1999
Infection rates of the sexually transmitted disease (STD) gonorrhoea among gay men are increasing at epidemic proportions. Some doctors have likened the increase to an epidemic between 1983 and 1985 when HIV infection rates also rose. By the end of last year, gonorrhoea infections had increased by almost 50 per cent across NSW, Professor John Tapsall from the Prince of Wales Hospital Gonococcal Reference Laboratory said yesterday. Inner Sydney medical centres are also reporting a rise in gonorrhoea infections, and according to a spokesperson for the Sydney Sexual Health Centre, there is anecdotal evidence of an increase in other STDs. Tapsall said the increase was not an "isolated phenomenon" in Sydney. He said increases in gonorrhoea infection are being reported in Melbourne, San Francisco and Seattle, predominantly among gay men. In 1996 the Sydney laboratory reported over 700 gonorrhoea isolates. This rose to 900 in 1997, and by the end of 1998 almost 1,400 isolates had been reported in NSW. South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service (SEAHS) have also experienced an upsurge in infections in inner Sydney with 506 cases reported in 1998 compared to 293 in 1997 and 261 in 1996. AIDS Council of NSW chief executive officer Robert Griew said the increase was making "more people vulnerable to HIV infection" and was "very dangerous to positive people’s health". In 1997, a study published in The Lancet found the viral load in HIV positive men with gonorrhoea was eight times higher. Surry Hills Medical Centre are holding an information session on gonorrhoea To register phone 9699 3311.
Last edited by Jetboy
I do think that Ray/Jetboy was caught once with a towel around his head singing a Cher song with a hairbrush as microphone by his parents as a child and then beaten -- or else ran into a particularly drunken and nasty Paul Lynde at a taping of the Hollywood Squares. What else could explain such irrational fear?
We must thank him for his links to the prayin' Coach and Americans for Truth and Gay Bashing or however they style themselves. These are useful bookmarks for composite characters for my ongoing sarcasm.
I think I shall use the "drag name" of "Miss Massengil Park-Cruiser" for my future roman a clef. This character will be a C of C preacher who has a heart attack in the large girls department at a deparment store in Atlanta wearing his "Queen of Somoa" lingerie. He is noted for both his Paul Lynde and Cher impersonations with his select few male companions alongside his vehement public denouncing of the "h*m*s*x*al agenda" in public.%

%(Gentle Readers of delicate sensibilities, decency does not permit the author from spelling out with all vowels the notorious perversion of the "Love that Dares Not Speak its Name.")

Was it "Half Breed" or "Gypsys Tramps and Thieves" that undid you, sir?
Neal, having lived in Lexington for a few years, I'm surprised you have made no better choice for your lead character than a pulpit minister in the church of Christ.

I could not begin to enumerate the local "characters" I encountered while I lived there, and only one of them was a member of the church of Christ. The local joke was her husband had to die to get away from her because she didn't believe in divorce.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by jetboy:


Having used IV drugs and less than 25 years of age ..... 16%3 (of the homosexual community) ..... 1.5% (of the general community) ..... 11 times the prevalence
Engaged in prostitution ..... 24% 3 (of the homosexual community) ..... 0.66% 4 ..... (of the general community) ..... 36 times the prevalence
For transvestites, the figure is 45% 3 engaged in prostitution
Having a lifetime STDs prevalence ..... 70% 3 (of the homosexual community) ..... 4% (of the general community) ..... 18 times the prevalence
Percentage alcoholism ..... 27% 3 (of the homosexual community) ..... 11% 5 (of the general community) ..... 2.5 times the prevalence
Median number of partners ..... 38 per year
Having a brief or no knowledge of partners ..... 90% 4
Involved in whipping, sadism or masochism ..... 21% 3 (of the homosexual community) Sadism and 'anti-violence' (1997 Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras, page 99) are somewhat incongruous.
Of those with HIV, having anogenital warts ..... 92%
Of those not having HIV and having anogenital warts ..... 76% 3
Acquired multiple wart virus subtypes, within 17 months ..... 75% 3 (of the homosexual community)
Involved in 'rimming' (mouth to anus contact) .....61% 3 (of the homosexual community)
Having anal pre-cancer ..... 18.0% (of the homosexual community) .... 0.03% 8 (of the general community) ..... 650 times the prevalence
Having HIV ( < 25 years 10%, > 25 years 24% ) ..... 21.8% 3 (of the homosexual community)
Average age of death from AIDS ..... 35.7 years
Expected average life span ..... 45 years (of the homosexual community) ..... 70 years 10 (of the general community)

Jetboy- Given the alarming stats. above you should probably be smart and engage in safer sex. So next time have your partner wear a condom for your personal health and safety.

Thanks for the information. Always good to have a professional opinion. I am providing a link that may add to the information you provided the members of the Times Daily Forum.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPZBTszZbyU&feature=related
quote:
Originally posted by jetboy:
quote:
You just DO NOT ASSAULT PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE THEM.



nope, another of your distortions. I kicked the TWO males because they made sexual advances toward me. Kind of like a decent woman slapping a man for unwanted sexual advances. Just shoot 'em all I guess is your answer. Let them put their hands all over you, oh wait, is that the abuse you keep speaking of?


Not that I care one way or the other, but jetboy admitted he is 46:1 already with the above. That's 46:1's story he's commenting on as though it happened to him...thus the same person. Just an FYI if anyone cares to know. Smiler
quote:
These statistics are for consideration by anyone.


Evidently stolen from http://www.christianarsenal.com/HomoHealth.htm

In today's society Homosexuality and Lesbianism are being hailed by many as a normal healthy life styles. Many laudatory and complimentary things are being reported and circulated about these individuals. We at The Christian Arsenal believe that the people in this life style are precious in God's site just as we all are. We believe that they should be treated with the same dignity as anyone. We however disagree with their position in the matter of sexuality. We do not look down on them, we disagree with them. These statistics are for consideration by anyone.



Yes, that is certainly an unbiased source for accurate scientific information. 25% of homosexuals are prostitutes? Yeah, riiiight.

Even if all the stats were true (they aren't) that is still no justification for hating them because of who they are.
Glad someone looked up the source. I was too busy laughing to type a few of them in the search engine block myself.
Most of them sound as if they fit that holy rolly preacher from Colorado with the meth problem and boyfriend he paid and a certain senator from Idaho more than the gay community at large to me!
Unnatural sex acts? Did someone have to take a class, kindle fire, flake stone, or work metal in order for the love that dares not speak its name be made complete?
It is truly astonishing that so few can be so outraged and loud about something which does not concern them at all -- it seems right unhealthy to me, all this constant jabber about h*m*s*x*ality and about as annoying as all the dash of Isiah, smidgen of Daniel and heaping tea spoon of Revelation for determining the mechanism(s) of the end of the world. It seems as silly as picking out people with facial warts for abuse.
Mrs. Patrick Campbell said it best, "So long as they do not do it in the streets and frighten the horses . . . ."
quote:
Originally posted by GoFish:
quote:
These statistics are for consideration by anyone.


Evidently stolen from http://www.christianarsenal.com/HomoHealth.htm

In today's society Homosexuality and Lesbianism are being hailed by many as a normal healthy life styles. Many laudatory and complimentary things are being reported and circulated about these individuals. We at The Christian Arsenal believe that the people in this life style are precious in God's site just as we all are. We believe that they should be treated with the same dignity as anyone. We however disagree with their position in the matter of sexuality. We do not look down on them, we disagree with them. These statistics are for consideration by anyone.

Yes, that is certainly an unbiased source for accurate scientific information. 25% of homosexuals are prostitutes? Yeah, riiiight.

Even if all the stats were true (they aren't) that is still no justification for hating them because of who they are.

Hi Fish,

You truly amaze me. Do you EVER read the information BEFORE you comment on it. I have not visited that web site; but, I did read the paragraph excerpted -- and I do NOT find hate in that statement. I see love, repect, dignity for the individual -- but, disagreement on the lifestyle.

Yet, you see HATE. Where?

Or is your goal just to stir up discord?

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill
quote:
Yes, that is certainly an unbiased source for accurate scientific information.


They gave their sources,

"References:
3 Sydney Men And Sexual Health (SMASH) Study, 1995, Volume B2, Australian Society of HIV Medicine.
4 International Social Science Program (ISSP), Component of the National Social Science Survey (NSSS), of the Social Sciences Data Archives (SSDA), at the Australian National University (ANU). Family Life Survey 1989-90.
5 Statistics on Drug Abuse in Australia in 1994. Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health. AGPS, ISSN 0817 - 3575.
6 Kippax S. (1995) Predictors of unprotected male-to-male anal intercourse with casual partners in a national sample. Australian Journal of Public Health 19:2:132.
7 Kiviat 1993 as reported in Mindel 1995, Human Papilloma Virus Edward Arnold. p70.
8 Melbye M. (1994) High incidence of anal cancer among AIDS patients. Lancet. 343 (I) :636.
9 Gold J., Yeuming L., Kaldor J. (?1994) Premature Mortality in Australia 1983 -1992; The first decade of the AIDS Epidemic.
10 Australian Social Trends 1995 ABS Canberra."


If you care to refute with stats, please do, but " Even if all the stats were true (they aren't)" doesn't quite cut it! Thats school yard stuff.
Roll Eyes
This thread is total insanity. I left for a week and I can't even begin to make sense of what has been added.

The topic is "Discussion Blocked". Regardless of what jetboy or anyone thinks about the unfairness of being blocked, the moderator found SOMETHING you said offensive.

Here's a tip. If you don't want to defend somthing you have said or you can't handle being the bad guy, stop posting personal information.

What you said about your encounter with the 2 homosexual men was more information than anyone else has posted. Most people say "Yes I know a homosexual" or "No I don't".

No one else on this entire forum has posted details about their reaction (and form of retaliation) against 2 homosexual men.

Was this encounter at Wilson or Veterans Park? You seemed to KNOW for CERTAIN that these are "gay" parks. Let me ask, why were YOU there?
quote:
Originally posted by jetboy:
Bill, I'm still waiting on you to stand up and admit you lied about me.

Hi Jetboy,

The post below was posted on May 3rd -- and, as I said then, if you were not the one who complained -- then, I apologize. However, as my favorite television lawyer, Benjamin Matlock, would say, "With every piece of evidence pointing toward you, you shore enough look guilty." But, good old Matlock has gotten some shaky characters off -- so, I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

On the other hand, Mr. Shakespeare also wrote, "Methinks he doth protest too much" or something to that effect. Or, something else Matlock might say, "That old hen shore is squawking a lot, considering she ain't even laid a egg yet!"

So, my Friend, since neither of us can prove his case -- why don't we just put it behind us and find something beneficial to discuss?

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

quote:
Originally posted by jetboy:
quote:
and I admit that until you complained to EH and she PMed me,


you are a liar Bill. You keep saying that I reported you the EH@timesdaily. That is why I posted this thread, hoping EH will tell why it was removed.

Does your God allow you to lie so freely?

I agree it did kind of make you look like a fool, you trying to be a smartass with the book of snoopy while at the same time you were stealing protected material.

Hi Jetboy,

It is possible that you are not the one who complained to EH. However, you are the only one who made an issue of the comic strip copyright. As a matter of fact, from what I have seen, you are the only one who even noticed it. I have had the comic strip in my image archive for a long time, and I posted the comic strip -- and I never noticed it. And EH stated in a PM that it was not her who noticed it. As she said, we are a self-policing Forum -- which means that she was not looking for a problem. However when it was pointed out to her by someone complaining -- she had to do something; so she deleted the post and sent me a PM.

When I got her initial PM about copyrighted material, I was confused and thought she was talking about the excerpt from the abortion web page I had put in my post. I asked why that was wrong; and this is when she mentioned the comic strip and implied that it was brought to her attention. Since you are the only person who seemed to notice the copyright faux pas -- I assumed it had to be you who complained.

If I was wrong in that assumption; then, I do apologize. If I am right in that assumption -- let's just put it behind us and go on with more meaningful dialogues.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Photos (1)
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
Hi Jetboy,
If I am right in that assumption -- let's just put it behind us and go on with more meaningful dialogues.
Bill


Meaningful dialogue? jetboy?
Nah...not possible. Big Grin
quote:
Originally posted by _Joy_:
quote:
Originally posted by jetboy:
quote:
You just DO NOT ASSAULT PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE THEM.



nope, another of your distortions. I kicked the TWO males because they made sexual advances toward me. Kind of like a decent woman slapping a man for unwanted sexual advances. Just shoot 'em all I guess is your answer. Let them put their hands all over you, oh wait, is that the abuse you keep speaking of?


Not that I care one way or the other, but jetboy admitted he is 46:1 already with the above. That's 46:1's story he's commenting on as though it happened to him...thus the same person. Just an FYI if anyone cares to know. Smiler


At least now they can see that I am not jetboy, especially since I am a woman,,a wife,, and a mother.... thakn you for showing this comment....
and 46:1 is still roaming around the TD forums trying to terrorize people with his discriminating self under the alias jetboy LOL how many more alias's you have jet46;1boy? Eeker ConfusedBig Grin
quote:
Originally posted by 2_each_its_own:
quote:
Justasking
Small Talker

Posted 07 May 2008 11:56 AM Hide Post
Could be off his meds again 2 each



Big Grin Big Grin



I like his first nickname " Ratboy " Big Grin
quote:
Originally posted by TheTotalTruth:
quote:
Originally posted by _Joy_:
quote:
Originally posted by jetboy:
quote:
You just DO NOT ASSAULT PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE THEM.



nope, another of your distortions. I kicked the TWO males because they made sexual advances toward me. Kind of like a decent woman slapping a man for unwanted sexual advances. Just shoot 'em all I guess is your answer. Let them put their hands all over you, oh wait, is that the abuse you keep speaking of?


Not that I care one way or the other, but jetboy admitted he is 46:1 already with the above. That's 46:1's story he's commenting on as though it happened to him...thus the same person. Just an FYI if anyone cares to know. Smiler


At least now they can see that I am not jetboy, especially since I am a woman,,a wife,, and a mother.... thakn you for showing this comment....


Clueless here Smiler, but you are most welcome. I have been swamped this week & can't keep up with current threads.
quote:
Originally posted by jetboy:
quote:
I'm not "meanasasnake" ...but I can be when I need to be....lol

Roll Eyes


You know what, jetboy? I owe you an apology. I couldn't see why you were so hostile and twisting everyone's remarks around to turn them into an attack...making them want to attack back. But reading through a lot more of these threads and paying attention to who was doing the posting, I see you are not the only one doing that. They... "some, not all" ...are doing the same thing to you as well as others. There seems to be little "clicks" on here, much like it was in highschool, where one will head out as leader of the pack and the other members of their little "click" will fall in like a pack of wolves with their snide and catty remarks. I apologize for joining them before I really understood what was going on. Just that old High School mentality kicking in I guess. But now I understand a little better. That doesn't mean I approve of your remarks....just that I understand why you made them. I won't be here to see any response you may want to make so all I can do is hope you accept my apology. I am going back to a forum where I can actually converse with adults. This place is more like a teen-age chatroom. Good Luck to you.

P.S. Did you see where Bill actually called me Jetboy? Isn't that a laugh for both of us.

Keep smiling.

Add Reply

Post

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×