quote:
Originally posted by kperk:
I was just watching a program with actual footage of saddam using weapons of mass destruction to kill almost 90,000 civilians in a matter of days. Thousands of people including small children and babies seemingly frozen in agony. Isn't it funny how a certain segment of our population now wants to act like this never happened, that saddam had no weapons of mass destruction just to promote their political attack on President Bush. May the ghosts of those 190,000 people haunt you forever and you know who you are.
I haven't heard too many of us commie libs singing the praises of Saddam as you or others seem to be suggesting. I don't think anyone can argue that he was a bad man and a bad leader. But is it the job of the United States of America to police the world and go around removing bad people from office in other countries? If so, why are we not in Sudan. Where was Uncle Sam during the genocide in Rwanda? I'm sorry, but the way I see it, if a country has a bad leader, that is NOT MY PROBLEM -- unless of course that leader presents a CREDIBLE threat to this country. Or do we only care about removing bad leaders from countries who possess vast petroleum reserves? And just pay "lip service" to the others?