quote:
Originally posted by JuanHunt:
The fact that you want to equate child molesters, rapists and serial killers to gays, ends any credibility you thought you might have.
I don't think PR was equating gays to any of those groups. He was merely asking the question, "Should everyone who was 'born different' be granted preferential treatment?" "Oh, they were born that way, so it's okay." Maybe he was saying that just because certain types of people are everywhere, it doesn't mean they should be treated differently. I don't know. I DO know that the repeal was more of an agenda than something that was REALLY thought out and deemed necessary.
The UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) Article 125. Sodomy states:
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.While this one may be hard to enforce, don't you think a whole, pardon the pun, butt-ton of military personnel will soon be charged with this? Unless they re-write the UCMJ, military officials will be WELL within their rights to bring someone before the green table for this one.
Or. . . "You can be gay, but don't have sex." Of course, this article applies to straight personnel who partake in "unnatural carnal copulation." Can doctors determine whether the anus was used as anything other than a check valve?