Skip to main content

Ok teyates, you are just as special. Do you feel better now? I don't believe that you are anywhere near as knowledgable and educated as Dr. Gupta, but I will let you have that just so you can continue on with your over inflated persona here on the TD forums.

 

You were the one that brought up Dr. Gupta's physical appearance. Seems that maybe you are the one that is enamored by his good looks. I was trying to stick to his medical credentials. Personally I don't care what he looks like. I care that he has the expertise to back up his opinion on the subject. 

 

I read the news article, found it interesting, copied and pasted it, title and all. Then you and Bud flipped out. Not sure why you got your panties in a wad over it, but you seem to have some kind of grudge against Dr. Gupta. Jealously maybe? I really don't know, nor do I care. 

 

 

Originally Posted by Ubu:

uhhhhhhh Jank.........I can verify te's cred's............he's got them in spades.  LOL, I'll even say that if you want an opinion on long term effects, he's the man..........

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Hey Semi! ((((muah))))

______________

 

I just read this again and I have a question... Are you saying what I think you are saying? Teyates has personal experience with long term MJ use? 

 

 

Originally Posted by Jankinonya:
Originally Posted by Ubu:

uhhhhhhh Jank.........I can verify te's cred's............he's got them in spades.  LOL, I'll even say that if you want an opinion on long term effects, he's the man..........

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Hey Semi! ((((muah))))

______________

 

I just read this again and I have a question... Are you saying what I think you are saying? Teyates has personal experience with long term MJ use? 

 

 +++++++++++++

Nope...................not that way at all. You are too funny.  

 

Digging myself out of the hole I have apparently dug. I would say that his "area of expertise" would appear to be more suited for an opinion along that line.

 

My apologies to TE for posting something that could be construed in such a manner................Not my intent.

Glad to see you back and feeling good.

 

Since I know you to be an honest person, I will give old teyates the benefit of the doubt that he is in fact a Dr. However, I will still don't believe he is anywhere near as credentialed as Dr. Gupta. I recently took my father to a Neurosurgeon in Birmingham a month ago. I ask the Dr there if he recommended any Dr in our area, due to the long drive. He said no. He recommended one in Nashville as the closest Dr he would want my Dad to see, other than himself. Surely he would have known of our very own prominent Dr. Teyates? 

 

What do you call a Dr. that graduated at the bottom of his class? Dr.... hahahaha

I'm a little unsure where this snot throw is coming from. Tey's first post on this matter was very well informed and one with which I have much agreement with. The second one about Gupta was an opinion of why Gupta changed his mind. With that  post I disagree, but who can know the heart of another, so his guess is as good as mine.

I do think, however, that Gupta DID reassess his beliefs, and the documentary "WEED" is a story of that. I respect any person who will study a subject, learn new facts , change their opinion based on those newly discovered facts, and will stand up and say "I was wrong" .

I don't know, nor do I believe Tye , nor anyone else knows whether the chicken or egg came first in this situation.

It is supposed to air again Friday night at ( (I think) .

If you haven't watched it, I would imagine it is difficult to state an educated opinion on Gupta's motives.

Ubu, no problem, I didn't take it that way at all.  Some folks get all googleyeyed when they see a TV personality, and think their opinion means everything. They probably also listen to Dr. Phil, but maybe not any more since he is not such good friends with Oprah....haha

I don't have to get in a wee wee contest with Dr. Gupta, as I did not disagree with what he said.  I do however believe that this story, and his opinion, were manipulated to bring ratings to the network and prop up a piece of propaganda.

As to your assertion that I smoke weed, it is just another of your uniformed opinions of someone you really know nothing about.

Having worked my way thru the system, I know all about Grady Hospital.  It is the foster child of the Emory Medical System.  When I spent time there many years ago, it was a well known fact that you didn't use the stairwells in certain areas alone or unarmed.  the very people you were trying to save hung out in the hsadows to mug, rape or kill you.  I personally never had the first person experience, but the stories scared me enough that I made sure I did not become another statistic.  It is sad that such a great training facility had that going for it, but it did serve as the largest trauma center in the Atlanta metro area.

I am sure Gupta is a fine physician, but I stand by my original premise, that one does not need to be so enamored with a TV personality that they let judgement and discernment stand in the face of reason. 

I am still trying to figure out why it upsets teyates and bud that Dr. Gupta wrote an article talking about the documentary he did on "Weed". 

 

Help me understand how it in anyway takes away from the information in the story that he is a nice looking man, or that he is on a News show. 

 

What is the problem?

 

Why is it wrong for him to use the media to get his opinion out to the public? Is that not what its for? Should he have hired a plane to fly a banner? Maybe he should have went town to town and had tent meetings. This is an important topic to many people in America for several reasons. Not only, as I think we all agree, (except for maybe Bud) that the war on drugs is a financial fiasco and destructive to our society, but medical MJ has shown to be effective in helping many sick people. It is a serious issue and is being debated at the states and at the federal level. 

 

So I ask again. Why the big upset about Dr. Gupta giving his educated opinion and promoting his documentary pertaining to it? If you don't disagree then why are you so upset that he is utilizing his position to speak out and educate those that maybe don't know much about the issue? 

 

As I said before I didn't bring up his looks. I don't care what he looks like. All I cared about was that he was qualified to give an expert and educated opinion on the topic. Just because he is on TV does not take away his qualifications or his obvious credentials. 

 

 

Jank, I said he did it for the ratings.  Doesn’t upset me at all but it is what it is.  Networks do it all the time in one form or another to promote a special agenda.  He had to write that piece before the special was announced because if he didn’t, he would have had to offer a carefully crafted explanation afterwards as to why he changed his position.

 

By the way, did he have a special before supporting his previous position?

 

And what is so earth shattering about his revelations?  What he saying that hasn’t been said by many others all along?

 

As far as what he looks like, I’ve no dog in that fight.  But if I did, I pick some hot looking babe and the results would be the same...just another media talking head.

 

Ever see this Dr. Drew Pinsky [sic]?  He says he’s an internist but he got his fame fielding sexual dysfunctional questions on MTV or something.  Now he playing psychoanalyst trying to crawl into the brain of killers.  WTH?

 

Personally I wouldn’t go to a TV doc any more than I would go to Jimmy Swaggart for spiritual guidance.

 

But hey, do what you want to do.  Like him for his looks, his agenda, his persona, his creds.  I don’t care.

 

I just took exception to "the follow the money & blind and stupid remarks towards law enforcement."  Jank, there is a war on drugs and that money those agencies receive was gained at the risk of LEO lives.  And that, my BFF, is the cold hard truth.

 

We clear on that?

Originally Posted by budsfarm:

Jank, I said he did it for the ratings.  Doesn’t upset me at all but it is what it is.  Networks do it all the time in one form or another to promote a special agenda.  He had to write that piece before the special was announced because if he didn’t, he would have had to offer a carefully crafted explanation afterwards as to why he changed his position.

 

By the way, did he have a special before supporting his previous position?

 

And what is so earth shattering about his revelations?  What he saying that hasn’t been said by many others all along?

 

As far as what he looks like, I’ve no dog in that fight.  But if I did, I pick some hot looking babe and the results would be the same...just another media talking head.

 

Ever see this Dr. Drew Pinsky [sic]?  He says he’s an internist but he got his fame fielding sexual dysfunctional questions on MTV or something.  Now he playing psychoanalyst trying to crawl into the brain of killers.  WTH?

 

Personally I wouldn’t go to a TV doc any more than I would go to Jimmy Swaggart for spiritual guidance.

 

But hey, do what you want to do.  Like him for his looks, his agenda, his persona, his creds.  I don’t care.

 

I just took exception to "the follow the money & blind and stupid remarks towards law enforcement."  Jank, there is a war on drugs and that money those agencies receive was gained at the risk of LEO lives.  And that, my BFF, is the cold hard truth.

 

We clear on that?

=======

A "war on drugs" that should have ended with the Carter admin.

 

Originally Posted by budsfarm:

Jank, I said he did it for the ratings.  Doesn’t upset me at all but it is what it is.  Networks do it all the time in one form or another to promote a special agenda.  He had to write that piece before the special was announced because if he didn’t, he would have had to offer a carefully crafted explanation afterwards as to why he changed his position.

 

We will just have to agree to disagree on this. I believe he has changed his mind and wanted to set the record straight. He spent a lot of time investigating and researching an issue that is very much a hot topic these days. I personally expect news media to cover the current events going on. Don't you? Of course they care about ratings. I just don't think this was driven primarily by ratings. 

 

By the way, did he have a special before supporting his previous position?

 

I have no idea. Since it was a well known fact that he didn't support medical MJ at one time I assume he must have publicly announced that somewhere, somehow. 

 

And what is so earth shattering about his revelations?  What he saying that hasn’t been said by many others all along?

 

Did you watch the doc? New research has come out that was not available before. He went deeper into the questions that many people have and tried to find answers. To the medical community, maybe nothing was all that earth shattering. This was for the public to see and understand what is now known about medical MJ. Information is never a bad thing Bud.

 

As far as what he looks like, I’ve no dog in that fight.  But if I did, I pick some hot looking babe and the results would be the same...just another media talking head.

 

That is apparently teyates hang up. He don't like the fact that Dr. Gupta is a nice looking man. I have never been swayed by a pretty face. I'm one of those chicks that dig intelligence over good looks. Of course its nice when it is a package deal. Personally Dr. Gupta is not really my type in the looks dept. He is kinda swarthy. 

 

Ever see this Dr. Drew Pinsky [sic]?  He says he’s an internist but he got his fame fielding sexual dysfunctional questions on MTV or something.  Now he playing psychoanalyst trying to crawl into the brain of killers.  WTH?

 

I don't know who that is. I don't watch a lot of TV. 

 

Personally I wouldn’t go to a TV doc any more than I would go to Jimmy Swaggart for spiritual guidance.

 

I hear ya. I don't think that Dr. Gupta is "just a TV Dr" though. He is very qualified in his field. As I told teyates he was considered for the position of Surgeon General. Not really in the same catagory as Dr. Phil.

 

But hey, do what you want to do.  Like him for his looks, his agenda, his persona, his creds.  I don’t care.

 

I just took exception to "the follow the money & blind and stupid remarks towards law enforcement."  Jank, there is a war on drugs and that money those agencies receive was gained at the risk of LEO lives.  And that, my BFF, is the cold hard truth.

 

We clear on that?

___________________

 

Bud, surely you know that there have been many depts that have been caught taking money from people and claiming it was drug money and keeping it. I assume you also know the fines and cost for being caught with even a very small amount of MJ. They are ridiculously high. You yourself even admitted that the depts use that money to fund their equipment. Private prison systems are making a killing off of the drug crimes. They get paid very well to lock them up. I don't mean this as an insult to the working LEO's in the field, but yes, money is being made by these laws. At a very high cost to the citizens. There is no incentive for the depts to want these laws changed. It will be a loss to their general funds.

 

You should not have taken what I said personally. I don't hold the LEO's responsible for enforcing the laws. I actually said so, but you seemed to have missed that part of my post. As for officier paying with their lives....well it happens. And its sad when it does. However, there is a drug arrest made every 30 seconds in this country and the majority of them are MJ. The problem is that it is a case of "wag the dog" IF the laws were not what they are today, THEN the drug dealers would not have the kind of power that they have. Just as prohibition helped create the Mob as we know it, the war on drugs has helped create the violent criminal element in the trafficking of drugs. Law enforcement is a dangerous job no doubt about it. It would be regardless of the drug laws. The problem is that we have made it even more so with these laws. If we want to make it somewhat safer for officers to do their jobs, then we should snatch the power from these drug lords that would kill to keep their businesses running. If any adult could purchase MJ as easily as they do alcohol or cigarettes the criminal element that drives the illegal activity surrounding drugs would have a much smaller niche in society. 

 

 

You talk about officers lives being at risk...there is more than one way to lose your life. How many other young men have lost everything but their very existence from these laws? This "war on drugs" is not good for anyone. Last year 6 LEO's lost their lives during drug related arrest. In that same time 43 civilians were killed during drug arrest. Thousands were locked up away from family and freedom. Over a weed that should have never been illegal to start with. 

 

I do hope we are clear now. I never meant to insult the LEO's doing their jobs. When I said "blind and stupid" I meant those that did not see the money being made by the system. My belief is that it would be a win win for all involved if these laws were changed. 

Originally Posted by Jankinonya:
Originally Posted by budsfarm:

Jank, I said he did it for the ratings.  Doesn’t upset me at all but it is what it is.  Networks do it all the time in one form or another to promote a special agenda.  He had to write that piece before the special was announced because if he didn’t, he would have had to offer a carefully crafted explanation afterwards as to why he changed his position.

 

We will just have to agree to disagree on this. I believe he has changed his mind and wanted to set the record straight. He spent a lot of time investigating and researching an issue that is very much a hot topic these days. I personally expect news media to cover the current events going on. Don't you? Of course they care about ratings. I just don't think this was driven primarily by ratings. 

 

By the way, did he have a special before supporting his previous position?

 

I have no idea. Since it was a well known fact that he didn't support medical MJ at one time I assume he must have publicly announced that somewhere, somehow. 

 

And what is so earth shattering about his revelations?  What he saying that hasn’t been said by many others all along?

 

Did you watch the doc? New research has come out that was not available before. He went deeper into the questions that many people have and tried to find answers. To the medical community, maybe nothing was all that earth shattering. This was for the public to see and understand what is now known about medical MJ. Information is never a bad thing Bud.

 

As far as what he looks like, I’ve no dog in that fight.  But if I did, I pick some hot looking babe and the results would be the same...just another media talking head.

 

That is apparently teyates hang up. He don't like the fact that Dr. Gupta is a nice looking man. I have never been swayed by a pretty face. I'm one of those chicks that dig intelligence over good looks. Of course its nice when it is a package deal. Personally Dr. Gupta is not really my type in the looks dept. He is kinda swarthy. 

 

Ever see this Dr. Drew Pinsky [sic]?  He says he’s an internist but he got his fame fielding sexual dysfunctional questions on MTV or something.  Now he playing psychoanalyst trying to crawl into the brain of killers.  WTH?

 

I don't know who that is. I don't watch a lot of TV. 

 

Personally I wouldn’t go to a TV doc any more than I would go to Jimmy Swaggart for spiritual guidance.

 

I hear ya. I don't think that Dr. Gupta is "just a TV Dr" though. He is very qualified in his field. As I told teyates he was considered for the position of Surgeon General. Not really in the same catagory as Dr. Phil.

 

But hey, do what you want to do.  Like him for his looks, his agenda, his persona, his creds.  I don’t care.

 

I just took exception to "the follow the money & blind and stupid remarks towards law enforcement."  Jank, there is a war on drugs and that money those agencies receive was gained at the risk of LEO lives.  And that, my BFF, is the cold hard truth.

 

We clear on that?

___________________

 

Bud, surely you know that there have been many depts that have been caught taking money from people and claiming it was drug money and keeping it. I assume you also know the fines and cost for being caught with even a very small amount of MJ. They are ridiculously high. You yourself even admitted that the depts use that money to fund their equipment. Private prison systems are making a killing off of the drug crimes. They get paid very well to lock them up. I don't mean this as an insult to the working LEO's in the field, but yes, money is being made by these laws. At a very high cost to the citizens. There is no incentive for the depts to want these laws changed. It will be a loss to their general funds.

 

You should not have taken what I said personally. I don't hold the LEO's responsible for enforcing the laws. I actually said so, but you seemed to have missed that part of my post. As for officier paying with their lives....well it happens. And its sad when it does. However, there is a drug arrest made every 30 seconds in this country and the majority of them are MJ. The problem is that it is a case of "wag the dog" IF the laws were not what they are today, THEN the drug dealers would not have the kind of power that they have. Just as prohibition helped create the Mob as we know it, the war on drugs has helped create the violent criminal element in the trafficking of drugs. Law enforcement is a dangerous job no doubt about it. It would be regardless of the drug laws. The problem is that we have made it even more so with these laws. If we want to make it somewhat safer for officers to do their jobs, then we should snatch the power from these drug lords that would kill to keep their businesses running. If any adult could purchase MJ as easily as they do alcohol or cigarettes the criminal element that drives the illegal activity surrounding drugs would have a much smaller niche in society. 

 

 

You talk about officers lives being at risk...there is more than one way to lose your life. How many other young men have lost everything but their very existence from these laws? This "war on drugs" is not good for anyone. Last year 6 LEO's lost their lives during drug related arrest. In that same time 43 civilians were killed during drug arrest. Thousands were locked up away from family and freedom. Over a weed that should have never been illegal to start with. 

 

I do hope we are clear now. I never meant to insult the LEO's doing their jobs. When I said "blind and stupid" I meant those that did not see the money being made by the system. My belief is that it would be a win win for all involved if these laws were changed. 

============

As to Gupta's creds, I believe he is , what Jethro Bodine always wanted to be - a brain surgeon. 

(Although Jethro never could make up his mind whether to be a brain surgeon, or a rocket scientist)

Jank, I appreciate your comments though I don’t express it as I should or as often.

 

I appreciate all but one.  The 6/48 ratio.  So I guess it boils down to body count.  You have the advantage of google and all I have is the advantage of is experience, though basic compared to front line operatives.  So lets compare, shall we?

 

Those 6 LEO’s killed...how many of their assailants were not charged or found not guilty by reason of self defense?  How many charged and convicted of murder?

 

Those 48 civilians killed, I presume by LEO’s...how many of those shootings were found to be excessive force by the LEOs?  Or not justified?

 

See, unless you can prove otherwise, we had 6 murdered LEOs whose families buried their loved one and at least 48 LEOs who went home to their families only to fight another day.

 

Another thing, you didn’t mentioned the number of druggie on druggie killings.  That’s part of the war too.  And they too left families behind.  You really think legalizing pot is going to stop that?  That the billion+  dollar cartel is going to roll over that easily?  What do you think this is, some B movie about moonshiners and revenoooers?

 

Your number of civilian casualties is really way short isn’t it especially when it should have included Mexico, the main supplier to the US.

 

Remember telling us about the poor fella locked away, his career ruined over a silly drug charge?  Lets talk about his predicament.  And we’ll start with personal responsibility.  You’ve heard "don’t do the crime if you’re can’t do the time," right?  He made that choice, didn’t he?  And I’m supposed to feel sorry for him because of a drug that you feel should be legalized.

 

The easiest way a bottom feeder on the drug chain can avoid prison time is to give up the name of his dealer...his supplier.  Obviously that didn’t happen.  Question is why.  I’m betting you think that’s out of loyalty to his dealer...to the person in the food chain above him.  Some perverted code of ethics.  Not true.

 

Your boy in prison knows the cardinal rule of survival on the streets and in prison....

 

Snitches wind up in ditches.

 

Over a drug you feel should be legalized.

 

We clear on that?

Originally Posted by budsfarm:
Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

Ubu, (glad to see you back) Jank, Bud, Teyates, Crash, seaweed, & dire.

I like all of you, & I ain't been smokin weed.

+++

 

Then I'll have whatever your having.

 

+++

 

C'mon people.  Smile on your brother.  Everybody get together and love one another right now. 

 

 

While I have many mixed emotions regarding legalizing Marijuana I have to say I fall on the side of making it legal.  I consider it very much the same as alcohol and actually believe there are or can be some beneficial health and medical benefits but also within lie the dangers that comes with abuse and addiction.  The point is that it's not going away and is going to continue to be popular and brought into the United States causing grief on many as they face life sentences for illegal activities of bringing it in and others who face devastating effects on their family livelihood if they get caught as a user.   

 

By making it legal you provide a controlled access to it as well as establishing taxes from selling it and a new market for those that seek to grow it.  Competition will eliminate the illegal importation of it and overnight you would do away with the illegal drug dealers for the most part or that would be my opinion as most likely price and availability would make it almost impossible to keep a cliental and supply line.  Frankly it's not that much different than Alcohol as it is now as for the reason people turn to it and seek it out.  

 

I'm always subject to be wrong and incorrect but as of now that's my opinion regarding it.  

Originally Posted by budsfarm:

Jank, I appreciate your comments though I don’t express it as I should or as often.

 

I appreciate all but one.  The 6/48 ratio.  So I guess it boils down to body count.  You have the advantage of google and all I have is the advantage of is experience, though basic compared to front line operatives.  So lets compare, shall we?

 

Those 6 LEO’s killed...how many of their assailants were not charged or found not guilty by reason of self defense?  How many charged and convicted of murder?

 

Those 48 civilians killed, I presume by LEO’s...how many of those shootings were found to be excessive force by the LEOs?  Or not justified?

 

See, unless you can prove otherwise, we had 6 murdered LEOs whose families buried their loved one and at least 48 LEOs who went home to their families only to fight another day.

 

Another thing, you didn’t mentioned the number of druggie on druggie killings.  That’s part of the war too.  And they too left families behind.  You really think legalizing pot is going to stop that?  That the billion+  dollar cartel is going to roll over that easily?  What do you think this is, some B movie about moonshiners and revenoooers?

 

Your number of civilian casualties is really way short isn’t it especially when it should have included Mexico, the main supplier to the US.

 

Remember telling us about the poor fella locked away, his career ruined over a silly drug charge?  Lets talk about his predicament.  And we’ll start with personal responsibility.  You’ve heard "don’t do the crime if you’re can’t do the time," right?  He made that choice, didn’t he?  And I’m supposed to feel sorry for him because of a drug that you feel should be legalized.

 

The easiest way a bottom feeder on the drug chain can avoid prison time is to give up the name of his dealer...his supplier.  Obviously that didn’t happen.  Question is why.  I’m betting you think that’s out of loyalty to his dealer...to the person in the food chain above him.  Some perverted code of ethics.  Not true.

 

Your boy in prison knows the cardinal rule of survival on the streets and in prison....

 

Snitches wind up in ditches.

 

Over a drug you feel should be legalized.

 

We clear on that?

___________________

Not really.

 

So you seriously can't see how there would be less violence if MJ was legalized? You think that some good ol country boy growing a few plants to smoke that gets 10 years in prison is justifiable and some how makes society safer? You don't see how making it legal and taxing the sale of MJ could take a lot of power away from violent drug dealers? 

 

History is a great teacher. We know from experience what prohibition did to society and crime. Why do you think it would be different with MJ?

 

I was going on memory on the number of drug related deaths for LEO's and civilians. I was off on both. This site keeps track of such deaths.

http://stopthedrugwar.org/taxonomy/term/242

 

If I read it right the number of LEO's was 8. Civilians were 55. Doesn't appear that any of those that killed officers are walking. Yet, it is very rare for LEO's who kill civilians that are unarmed to be prosecuted. Here are two examples...

 

"Law enforcement deaths began and ended the year. The first drug war death, on January 4, was that of Ogden, Utah, police officer Jared Francom, who was serving on the Weber-Morgan Metro Narcotics Strike Force when he was shot and killed during a "knock and enter" SWAT-style raid on a suspected marijuana grower. Five other officers were also shot and wounded, as was the homeowner, Matthew Stewart, who is now charged with his killing and faces a death sentence. 

 

Criminal prosecutions of police shooters, even in egregious cases, is rare. Winning a conviction is even less unlikely. When Lima, Ohio, police officer Joe Chavalia shot and killed unarmed Tanika Wilson, 26, and wounded the baby she was holding in her arms during a SWAT drug raid in 2008, he was the rare police officer to be indicted. But he walked at trial. "

 

Now before you think I am picking on the LEO's in anyway, believe me when I say that I don't want ANYONE to die because of drugs law enforcement. That is one of the main reasons this "war" needs to end. There are no winners. There never will be. 

 

I will tell you what I told my kids growing up about "snitching". Of course I didn't want them to do anything that would get them into trouble with the police or get involved with drugs. However, I am a realist and I knew there was a chance that they might try MJ. I did when I was a teen and most of my friends did too. I told them that if they were going to smoke pot and if they got caught then they owned it. They made the decision to break the law and they should not try and get out of their punishment by dragging anyone else down for their decision. It had nothing to do with fear of being a snitch. To me its the right thing to do. If you make a decision, knowing the consequences if you get caught, then you pay the price for your own actions. You don't point the finger at others to make your punishment easier on you. That doesn't come from any "drug code" that I know of. That comes from my own personal raising and what my parents taught me and what I taught my children. 

 

Having said that...I don't think it should be illegal to begin with. It definitely should not carry the kinds of sentences that it does. Heck child molesters get less time than pot smokers in many cases. 

 

I will say that if it were legal for recreational use in Alabama I would probably partake again.  I have trouble with insomnia from time to time and from what I remember it always put me to sleep.

Originally Posted by seeweed:
 

As to Gupta's creds, I believe he is , what Jethro Bodine always wanted to be - a brain surgeon. 

(Although Jethro never could make up his mind whether to be a brain surgeon, or a rocket scientist)

_______________________

 

I was surprised to find out that Blossom is a Dr of Neuroscience. Does anyone else remember Blossom besides me?

seeweed sez "(Although Jethro never could make up his mind whether to be a brain surgeon, or a rocket scientist)"

 

If I were him I would have opted to remain a double naught spy, the cars and women were much more flashy...

 

Blossom can be seen almost every night, now that she is grown up.  She plays Amy Farrar Fowler on the hit TV show The Big Bang Theory.  She actually plays a neuroscience investigatot on the show.  he speciality is looking at the nasty habits of monkeys.  She is a riot.

Originally Posted by Crash.Override:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

As a former long time resident of Atlanta, I've heard many of the same stories about Grady. And, confirmed them in the news.  Someone here has a real inferiority complex, he's trying to hide. 

____________

 

finally!! admitting you have a problem is the first step!

__________________________________

Then you need to take that first step.

Originally Posted by vplee123:

I agree with you, gbrk. 

Its no different than alcohol. And it wont add extra calories and a big beer gut. 

======

LOL, well I wouldn't go that far,. Obviously you are not aware of one of the affects of MJ, "the munchies" . A good thing for a cancer patient on cemo, not too good for people like me who are on the overweight side.

 

Originally Posted by Jobe:
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

As a former long time resident of Atlanta, I've heard many of the same stories about Grady. And, confirmed them in the news.  Someone here has a real inferiority complex, he's trying to hide. 

____________

 

finally!! admitting you have a problem is the first step!

__________________________________

Then you need to take that first step.

__________________

ok, i admit it. you have a problem. you can't remove your head from your ass!

Here’s a homework assignment to all of you former,  current, and wannabe users.

 

I want you to prove me wrong.  I’m on record as saying there is nothing in this special of note other than Gupta changing his mind.  Think of it...the impact it would of had had he came in first place in the USSG personality contest.

 

Since you’ve been involved in that drug culture or want to be and have far more insight that I do, I want to tell me your "Ah ha!" moment.  Something he says or does that has never been said or done before at least a hundred times.  Or since 2009 on Discovery/History

 

I’d love to sit around and mellow out with you guys and eat brownies, but honestly, I’m going out to partake of my drug of choice.  Good old legal alcohol.  And talk SEC football and opening day dove season.

 

Cheers, y’all.

 

Oh by the way, I saw a news article today...can’t remember where...Since pot was legalized in Washington State, the K-9s are having to be retrained.  Cool huh.  Problem is, Washington is an unhealthy state.  Too much cancer and glaucoma.

Originally Posted by budsfarm:

Here’s a homework assignment to all of you former,  current, and wannabe users.

 

I want you to prove me wrong.  I’m on record as saying there is nothing in this special of note other than Gupta changing his mind.  Think of it...the impact it would of had had he came in first place in the USSG personality contest.

 

Since you’ve been involved in that drug culture or want to be and have far more insight that I do, I want to tell me your "Ah ha!" moment.  Something he says or does that has never been said or done before at least a hundred times.  Or since 2009 on Discovery/History

 

I’d love to sit around and mellow out with you guys and eat brownies, but honestly, I’m going out to partake of my drug of choice.  Good old legal alcohol.  And talk SEC football and opening day dove season.

 

Cheers, y’all.

 

Oh by the way, I saw a news article today...can’t remember where...Since pot was legalized in Washington State, the K-9s are having to be retrained.  Cool huh.  Problem is, Washington is an unhealthy state.  Too much cancer and glaucoma.

----------------

Well, there are several medical cases here, but the one that I believe was  "ah ha" moment for him was a little kid, I think about 4, that had constant seizures. All existing meds had been tried, and the next step was the doctors wanted to induce coma to give her brain a chance. 
One dose of MJ extract (they live in Col, so had to find a dr to get a script) stopped the seizures down to 1 per week, from the 300 da day before. 
You should drink your Jack or whatever and kick back and watch it. Expand your knowledge base.

Have you considered that if it were made legal to grow, Bud's Farm could become Bud's Pot Farm and make millions ? AND, in the process, maybe help cure a lot of people - wouldn't that make you feel good ?

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×