you don't like hearing the exact same things i had to hear from you guys? you don't like someone telling you the exact same things that were told to them.. by the very people you support, daily? that hurts your feelings?
i can tell how the president's health bother's you.. by the lack of information given by trump about his health...
i can tell how you're worried about hillary's emails.. you've discussed them.. since you guys decided to scream 'benghazi'... how's that working for you?
what i can't tell... is why you're not worried about your choice for a president that you wouldn't leave alone in a room with your daughter!
your presidential choice is up on fraud and racketeering charges 20 DAYS AFTER THE ELECTION
then CHARGES OF RAPE OF A MINOR FOLLOWING THAT.
tell me more about your 'moral high ground'.... it's so obvious in your choice for a role model for your children/grandchildren.
Wow that's a lot to address but I will try and do so. THIS WILL BE LONG, It has to be in order to address all sufficiently. First of all it's not my intent or desire to hurt anyone in my post. I don't mind engaging in debate, expressing my beliefs, or defending my positions and why I take them but in no way do I ever mean or feel I demean or hurt anyone and believe me that is not my desire or intent. That said I do make it a point to express my feelings or beliefs, and to challenge those who have opposing views but I try to do that with questions or statements from sources I trust to challenge others or bolster my position but in no way do I desire to harm or hurt anyone.
Second I would appreciate not being grouped with others that you may find fault, in some way with, unless I am guilty of something then (if so) you should address that with me specifically rather than making a general "wide brush" grouping for as I said it's never my intent to harm/hurt anyone and if that is the result then I'd like to know it but that is speaking for myself only, the only one I can speak for.
Now regarding this statement you make: "i can tell how the president's health bother's you.. by the lack of information given by trump about his health..." please forgive me but I have no idea what you are talking about. First of all I have no idea about the President's health (that is Obama's health as he is President. Now if you mean Hillary, by your statement I think there has been ample evidence, and proof, that if health is an issue for anyone seeking the office then between Trump and Hillary there should be concern and questions ask because there has been observed episodes, recorded events, where Hillary has been totally incapacitated to the point of having to be carried into the "Scooby" van or carried up stairs or assisted in some ways. It does appear that she has some serious condition that is not being revealed or discussed. You also mention I don't ask about Trump.
Given that Trump has had no such observed or revealed episodes in any way where he has required assistance or appeared to be totally not in control of his abilities and given the exuberance in which he has exhibited in his travels around the campaign trail at times when Hillary is not seen anywhere and taking some sort of sabbatical then I have no reason or cause to question Trump's health. Both candidates are, for the best part, 70 years old and given that it's reasonable to take into consideration their vice presidential choices because it's reasonable to assume that it's totally possible that even if there was no current signs of ill health that such could occur at any time while in office given the EXTREME STRESS that the President is under. Stress very likely because of the secret knowledge that they are aware of from briefings about threats known to people in positions that need to know such verses the general public who go around blissfully ignorant of most threats around us or just how thin a line we all are walking each day/week. The President does have a stressful job and thus their health, physical and mental, is and should be an issue of concern to all and of both candidates but the sad FACT is that of the two Hillary is the ONLY one that has demonstrated, observed, LOSS OF CONTROL of her abilities and has needed complete assistance. If I don't openly question Trump then it's because such has not been observed regarding him.
Now regarding your statement "i can tell how you're worried about hillary's emails.. you've discussed them.. since you guys decided to scream 'benghazi'... how's that working for you?" It's not just her emails that concern me but more to the point her use, as Secretary of State, a high Government Official with access and briefings of America's TOP Classified secrets, and military information regarding what's going on with our Nation from day to day of a PRIVATE SERVER to contain her emails (personal & work related). By using a personal server, maintained by someone WITHOUT security clearance she not only is putting information that is classified, secret, of National security merit, where people without that clearance to see such WILL likely certainly see it, by virtue of running and maintaining the server, but also that is very easily subject to being hacked by foreign entities hostile to our Government who would certainly not only have the ability to hack into her private server but would know to do so. Given her position, as Secretary of State she should have known this was a threat. No one knows if information on her server may have led to hostiles, terrorist, foreign entities knowing the state of the Benghazi security level or detail or if the Ambassador would be there that day or if request for beefed up security was being made and being rejected (which by the way was happening by Secretary Clinton, by her and/or her associates working directly for her). There is no proof that such happened, that security was compromised or that Benghazi's attack was precipitated by information on her private server that got into the hands of hostiles but IT IS SOMETHING THAT COULD HAVE HAPPENED. That my friend should worry and concern ALL OF US (Democrats, republicans or Independents). She knew better, She did make a decision to go with a private server because Historically speaking and based in part on what people that know her and Bill have said, because she wanted to have the ability to keep some things secret, not from our Nation's adversaries but from those seeking freedom of information act FOIA access to what she was doing.
Believe what you want but the chances are, based on all information available, and from WikiLeaks, that she knew it was illegal, people around her knew it was illegal and dangerous and most likely was used to facilitate getting around the conflicts of interest between the Clinton Foundation, Donors, and her job as Secretary of State and to keep all that secret from those seeking to find out about it through Freedom of Information subpoenas which would have had access and applied to a Government, State Department Server that would have been infinitely more secure than her private one. Her desire for secrecy very likely did put National Security information, Secret Information, Classified information available to people who were NOT AUTHORIZED to see it.
That should concern you, me, and everyone else. I care not for her emails about Chelsea's wedding, yoga, or the like but she was in a position to know better and it was no mistake but was deliberate and typical of what these people do and have done for years.
Regarding Benghazi, that was under her command, it was her responsibility and she did fail in that regard. It was under her that request for beefed up and added security (from the ambassador and others) was turned down repeatedly and it was Hillary that LIED to the American people about the cause of the Attack along with Obama. It was Hillary who lied to the relatives of those killed at Benghazi and then who later accused the very same relatives of lying about what she said to them because she was trying to cover herself and what she did.
Crash we still don't know (as a nation or people) where our President was during the attack, at the time of the attack which killed four or our citizens including an ambassador. We don't know where he was, when he was told, how he was told, and more important what he did as a result and when he did it. We don't know what Hillary did or when she knew but what we do know is SOMEONE gave a stand down order to troops standing ready to assist those under attack and counter attack those attacking our citizens and those defending them but they were ordered not to assist and to "stand down". Even today we don't known who gave that order and given our day of ever knowing and suspicious media that is unfathomable and should concern many if not all Americans. What we DO KNOW is for weeks Obama and Hillary openly lied about the cause of the attack, blaming it on an obscure YouTube video that no one (not even the terrorist) knew about until they (Obama and Hillary) pointed to it as the cause of the attack. This diversion or lie was sold by Hillary and Obama and their people that worked for them, at a time that they obviously knew better. No one seems on wonder WHY they lied and they never paid a price for those lies, lies to the relatives of those killed at Benghazi and lies to the American people. A sitting President who to this day we don't know when he knew about an attack on our Nation or what he did in response and when he did it? That's unheard of and very disturbing to me and should be to you and others. Now Hillary, one of those actors and those caught up in that, wants to be President so IT IS RELAVENT and should be on the mind of anyone thinking about the election.
Last you try and inject unproven accusations about Donald Trump and women and morph that into "Little Girls" First of all Trump did have and speak in "men's course language" but he said nothing that most other men haven't and although wrong it's not actually acting on it. As far as the accusations that he did something those haven't been proven and he's denied them. Until it can be proven then no one should act on accusations that are made that are highly suspect as politically motivated. Like Harry Reid saying Romney didn't pay taxes, someone told him, so he sold it as fact where later it was PROVEN as lies and when confronted that it was known to be Lies all Harry Reid would say in his defense is "Romney Lost didn't he". Talk about violation of the Hatch Act! This was blatant lying on the part of the Senate leader in order to affect an election and now you say we should crucify Trump because some women in the last hours of the election say something happened, Trump touched them. What about the women that Bill Clinton, even as President, while President, RAPED, or had sex with? Bill didn't just touch them he assaulted them, raped them without their permission, and although Bill isn't running Hillary facilitated Bill doing this by not confronting him on it, calling him on it, but in turn she ATTACKED the very women that Bill Attacked and she did it to protect Bill.
Come on now Hillary's full of problems, you know it or should. Democrats should know it and yet they put her up as their candidate. WikiLeaks prove that the Democratic National Committee totally destroyed Bernie Sanders chances at ever beating her, they totally rigged it from the start and now it's evident they did so yet all this should be forgiven and forgot. WikiLeaks prove that Hillary Cheated during the primary debates and questions were provided by the, now, DNC chairperson, to Hillary who willingly took them and used them. Provided by CNN, not just one debate for two or more. Why do we not suspect the General election debates questions were not also leaked? CHEATING .. Proven!
WikiLeaks has PROVEN that Hillary's own top associates and helpers KNEW that the private server and emails were not only illegal but a problem and sought to delete them.
I could go on forever because there is that much corruption here. If you can't see it that's either you deciding to be blissfully ignorant with solid rose colored glasses, drinking the koolaid or just willing to accept anything if it means your candidate is elected. There are many good democrats that could have been run and that could have been elected but Hillary is not a good Democratic candidate, not a good candidate and if you believe the very secret service agents that guarded her a very vulgar, not nice, terrible person to be around. As for young kids it wasn't Trump that flew all those flights aboard a plane owned by and flown by a known convicted pedophile but Bill Clinton not only flew on these flights with this man, at the same time, but also flew to and stayed at his PRIVATE island where it has been proven young girls have been provided for this convicted pedophile's friends. Ever hear the national media ask Bill about those trips? no! nor will you but they happened.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/a...hillary-clinton.html
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016...reviously-known.html
Yes a recent, very recent, case says Trump flew on these planes and had contact with these girls and IF SO THEN HE SHOULD PAY THE PRICE but it has to be proven. YES I SAID THAT. HE should pay if guilty but at this point, given the timing, it appears it could be all politically motivated and false so until proven it's alleged and given the political season and risk it's very likely it's false as many law suits filed during the last of campaigns end up being. After their damages and after the election then the suits are remarkably dropped. Republicans AND Democrats do this all over the Nation and people should be held accountable who do such too. So if Trump is guilty then impeach him, convict him. BUT DON'T STOP THERE ... DO THE SAME TO BILL CLINTON! If you choose to ONLY go after Trump while turning a blind eye to Bill Clinton you disqualify yourself for this conversation and prove yourself a hypocrite.
Basically no one should put credence on any lawsuit or case filed in the last days of an election against any candidate, Democrat or Republican for most if not ALL are false and end up being politically motivated in order to attempt to destroy the candidate all while it's known they are false, just like when Harry Reid claimed he had a friend that said Mitt Romney didn't pay his taxes. Harry Reid should have been convicted on violation of the Hatch Act and at least made to resign for it was PROVEN he lied knowingly in order to affect the outcome of an election and then he bragged about it.
With respect to Hillary and the current FBI Charges. This is the Government charging her and for things that have been ongoing for years and not just come up and materialized at the end of a campaign. If the FBI has info and proof on Donald Trump then they should and would come forward. A democratically controlled Justice department holding back on Trump, right before an election? I don't think so. Doesn't pass the smell test.
So Crash I don't mean to demean you, hurt or harm you but at the same time the above is information that should prove to you and anyone that Hillary is a criminal, corrupt, flawed candidate that should not even be allowed to run and frankly the fact that she is the head of the democratic ticket proves that there is vast corruption at the top of the Democratic National Convention and Democrats should clean house and people should go to jail. The Democratic party has been corrupted and taken over. The last leader Shultz had to resign due to WikiLeaks information that convicted her and the current one, her replacement should also be cast aside for cheating during the debates. The fact that Hillary is your candidate proves there is gross corruption and problems at the very top of the Democratic organization and the people should attempt to regain control.
Crash, there are many good Democrats but sadly the Clintons are not among them nor have they ever been, from what it seems now.