Skip to main content

Yeah lefties, keep putting the muzzies/muzzie friends and the like minded in office, getting them all in our politics. Then tell us again how the demoslops are the ones for peoples' rights!!

============================

One of the pillars of the future totalitarian state in 1984 is the practice of doublethink, which Orwell defined as “the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. ... To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies -- all this is indispensably necessary.”

As it happens, this is a precise description of exactly what’s been going on in many parts of Europe in recent years, as multicultural ideology has been confronted by realities about Islam that, in a doublethink-free world, would send that ideology crashing to the ground in flames.

For a case in point, I will refer the reader to an episode I’ve mentioned previously in this space -- an Oslo debate last November at which the deputy chairman of Norway’s Islamic Council, Asghar Ali, refused to reject the death penalty for gays. When Senaid Kobilica, the head of the Islamic Council (which represents 60,000 Muslims), was asked where he stood on the question, he replied that he couldn’t give a definitive answer until he got a ruling from the European Fatwa Council. This week it was reported that he’s still waiting.

But not to worry! Kobilica added that he’s “100 percent certain that the fatwa council will not come out in favor of something which conflicts with European law.” Meaning that while the death penalty for homosexuals is, indeed, an orthodox Islamic position -- one about which the Fatwa Council’s head, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, has himself written sympathetically -- Western Muslim leaders, in accordance with the Koran (and with good strategy), prefer in such controversial cases not to challenge infidel law. (There will, after all, be time enough to execute gays in the coming decades, as the Muslim population attains critical balance in one country after another -- first, most likely, in France and Sweden and the Netherlands, and in Norway some time after that.)What’s most chilling about all this, however, is not the positions of these Muslim leaders but the reactions of the Norwegian establishment. Or, one should say, the lack of reaction.

Consider this. After last November’s debate, it emerged that Asghar Ali not only was deputy chairman of the Islamic Council but was also on the board of the Oslo Arbeidersamfunn, the largest and most influential association within Norway’s ruling Labor Party. Asked about Ali’s views, the head of the Oslo Arbeidersamfunn, Anne Cathrine Berger, lamented that some people “can’t see the difference between a board member’s views and the organization’s views.” Despite scattered calls for his dismissal, Ali remained on the board. (When a new board election was held in February, Ali chose not to run again.)

That’s not all: Ali is, in addition, secretary of the 37,000-member Electricians’ and IT Workers’ Union. After the November debate, the union’s website posted a “clarification” by Ali saying that “as a Norwegian Muslim” he in fact rejected the death penalty for gays. The words "as a Norwegian Muslim" amount to a disingenuous dodge -- they're the rhetorical equivalent of keeping your fingers crossed behind your back. To state that one rejects the death penalty for gays "as a Norwegian Muslim” isn’t the same as saying that one rejects it, period. Like what Kobilica said about European law, it’s simply an Islamist’s way of affirming that he accepts infidel law as it now stands; such a statement reveals absolutely nothing about his real position on the question, or about whether he is, in fact, dedicated to the goal of ultimately changing this and the rest of Norwegian law to conform with sharia. At this point in the ongoing Islamization of Europe, the slipperiness of Ali’s “clarification” should be manifest to any infidel who’s made an effort to understand how Muslims think about these matters. Yet the head of the Electricians’ and IT Workers’ Union , Hans Olav Felix, pronounced himself satisfied with Ali’s ”clarification,” and Ali remains in the #2 spot at the union.

As for the Norwegian government, there has been no serious effort, as far as I know, to rescind from the Islamic Council its half million kroner a year in state support.

https://pjmedia.com/blog/europ...ld-gays-be-executed/

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Here was one of Obama's friend/appointees: From one Muzzie to another...

In 2011, Barack Obama appointed Elibiary, a well known member of the Muslim Brotherhood, to a key position in our Department of Homeland Security. Oh……you didn’t know that? Sorry to be the one to break that news to you. And he’s not the only one. Obama has appointed numerous members of the MB to very sensitive positions in our government.

Back in September of 2014, Mohamed Elibiary was abruptly relieved of his duties at the Department of Homeland Security. There was speculation that he had leaked information to the Brotherhood, but nothing was confirmed. Where he is now and what he is doing should shock and alarm all of us.

Obama has placed the MOST radical Islamists in positions all over our government. I recently read a piece on Mohamed Elibiary, who Obama put in a key position in our DHS. Elibiary was relieved of his duties there last September 2014. There have been rumors of him leaking sensitive information, which is extremely troubling, since this man is a member and staunch supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Obama has had multiple meetings with the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House. The last meeting he arranged, the press was banned from attending. How are we allowing this to happen?? This is America — not Russia!

NO PLAN TO DESTROY ISIS

The rest of the country calls this Islamic killing machine “ISIS” but Obama and his minions call them ISIL. This is because of his hatred of Israel. The “L” stands for the Levant. It is a territory that includes Israel, which the terrorists plan to take, as they spread like cockroaches across the Middle East.

He has made it clear that there will be NO boots on the ground. I have read from credible sources that our so-called airstrikes against ISIS have been minimal.

River Runner posted:

Here was one of Obama's friend/appointees: From one Muzzie to another...

In 2011, Barack Obama appointed Elibiary, a well known member of the Muslim Brotherhood, to a key position in our Department of Homeland Security. Oh……you didn’t know that? Sorry to be the one to break that news to you. And he’s not the only one. Obama has appointed numerous members of the MB to very sensitive positions in our government.

Back in September of 2014, Mohamed Elibiary was abruptly relieved of his duties at the Department of Homeland Security. There was speculation that he had leaked information to the Brotherhood, but nothing was confirmed. Where he is now and what he is doing should shock and alarm all of us.

Obama has placed the MOST radical Islamists in positions all over our government. I recently read a piece on Mohamed Elibiary, who Obama put in a key position in our DHS. Elibiary was relieved of his duties there last September 2014. There have been rumors of him leaking sensitive information, which is extremely troubling, since this man is a member and staunch supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Obama has had multiple meetings with the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House. The last meeting he arranged, the press was banned from attending. How are we allowing this to happen?? This is America — not Russia!

NO PLAN TO DESTROY ISIS

The rest of the country calls this Islamic killing machine “ISIS” but Obama and his minions call them ISIL. This is because of his hatred of Israel. The “L” stands for the Levant. It is a territory that includes Israel, which the terrorists plan to take, as they spread like cockroaches across the Middle East.

He has made it clear that there will be NO boots on the ground. I have read from credible sources that our so-called airstrikes against ISIS have been minimal.

The woman holding/jerking  hilliary's strings, and has her ear and heart, is also connected to the muslim brotherhood.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...want-america-to-see/

direstraits posted:

The Muslim Brotherhood is at the root of most Islamist terrorist groups in the 20th/21st centuries.  The Saudi based Wahabi/Salafists date from the late 19th century.

I bet the Pentagon has presented Obama with a dozen different plans to eliminate ISIS -- ali rejected.

He has no interest in eliminating isis. Quite the opposite.

Last edited by Bestworking
direstraits posted:

The mayor of London is now a Muslim.  When will heads roll?

Years ago I worked at a place near Intergraph. People from all over the world came, maybe still do, to Intergraph to work/train, then they'd go home (I think now even terrorists wannabes were there, but that's a different story). People from England, even way back then, warned about the muzzies taking over, and said they hoped the US would wake up and not let it happen here the way it was happening in their country. Who knows, maybe even then it was too late.

Last edited by Bestworking

Let me give you Dems a warning, Islamist's hate atheists and socialists more than they hate conservative Christians. It will be Democrat(?) necks who meet the scimitar first.

(CNSNews.com) – European socialists are united with radical Muslims by a “mutual hatred for Judeo-Christian culture,” which is why they continue to defend failed multicultural policies that are promoting the Islamification of Europe, says Soeren Kern, a senior fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute.

“It’s called the Red-Green Alliance, red being the socialists and the green being Islam. There’s sort of a mutual interest on both sides to deconstruct the Judeo-Christian culture in Europe,” he explained.

“What the socialists don’t realize is that the Muslims hate them even more than they hate the Judeo-Christians, and so once it works out to its logical end, the socialists will be in big trouble.

“But right now, there’s a mutual interest to change the established historical culture in Europe. And that’s really what multiculturalism is all about,” Kern, an expert on Euorpean politics, told CNSNews.com.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/ar...-mutual-hatred-judeo

Just like the warnings we have been given for years! But so strong is the left's desire to rule, that they will gladly give over the country for the chance for money and power, and to **** with the consequences. Just look at hilliary clinton! Who in their right mind would think that frustrated lesbian, hateful, bytch could possibly be good for the country? But she's a typical socialist, lefty, whatever you call the evil *******, and tosses out the promises to the gimmethats and nothing else matters to them.

Last edited by Bestworking

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×