Skip to main content

Ex-Iraq Commander: "Bring the Troops Home Now"

Steve Benen: Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez has come out in support of the Democrats' war funding bill which requires a major troop pullout.


One assumes he'll be branded a "phony soldier" by the likes of Rush Limbaugh, but the former commander of U.S. troops in Iraq is stepping up to endorse the congressional Democrats' withdrawal policy.


Retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, who commanded U.S. troops in Iraq from 2003 to 2004, is scheduled to speak on behalf of the Democratic Party this weekend in support of a House war funding bill that would require President Bush to bring the bulk of U.S. troops home from Iraq by the end of next year. [...]


In portions of Saturday's expected Democratic radio address in response to weekly White House remarks, Sanchez says that recent improvements in security in Iraq "have not been matched by a willingness on the part of Iraqi leaders to make the hard choices necessary to bring peace their country." According to the prepared remarks, he plans to say that there is no evidence that the Iraqis will do so in the near future.


Sanchez also plans to argue that U.S. armed forces have been stretched thin by bad war policy and that the House war funding bill, which requires the redeployment of U.S. troops and other measures for the Pentagon to secure $50 billion in funding, is the appropriate approach. Sanchez is expected to say that the war has significantly hurt the military. The White House has threatened to veto any bill that attaches strings to the war funding.

"Our Army and Marine Corps are struggling with changing deployment schedules that are disrupting combat readiness training and straining the patience and daily lives of military families," Sanchez's will say. "It will take the Army at least a decade to repair the damage done to its full spectrum readiness, which is at its lowest level since the Vietnam War. In the meantime, the ability of our military to fully execute our national security strategy will be called into doubt, producing what is, in my judgment, unacceptable strategic risk."

To be sure, Sanchez is an imperfect messenger, but from a rhetorical perspective, it makes it a little tougher for Republicans to argue that the Democratic plan is anti-military when their policy is endorsed by the former commander of U.S. forces in Iraq. Conservative war supporters will say it anyway, of course, but it might resonate a little less.

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/68669/
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The thing here is you have an EX-commander's opinion as opposed to COMMANDER IN CHIEF'S opinion. Now only one of these individuals has the legal authority to make such decisions and if Sanchez did offer this opinion, he should be advised of his standing or lack thereof in this matter. Or as the prisident of Spain told Hugo Chavez the other day, "Sit down and shut up".
quote:
Originally posted by PBA:
quote:
Originally posted by skymaster:
There you go again cut and paste.
You need help.



Yep, Just another topic you wish to attack the poster rather than debate the poster.


Nail on the head PBA. Why can we not discuss the posting. Some will agree and some will not. That's OK. This is the purpose of this forum I think. Some prefer to use it as a public bashing against everyone. NOTICE You don't have to take offense with every posting and try to turn it into a slander-fest.
He's an ex-commander because his command decisions were not sound, and he did not properly supervise.

I find it ironic that you would quote the commander who was disgraced by the Abu Ghraib scandal...tempest in a teapot as it was.

The left voices such outcries against torture, then uses the commander who was in charge of US forces when alleged "torture" incidents took place as a reference.

Hypocritical at best.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×