FBI Closing In on Hillary

The FBI is doing their job.  The question is, will this administration prosecute according to law.

Yes, will the AG do her part, under the law, or succumb to the WH. Under Nixon, the AG, deputy AG and Solicitor General resigned before accepting illegal demands.

This AG is about as useless as the one she replaced.

I haven't seen many Obama appointees with a smidgen of integrity, so I'm betting on no indictment unless there is enough discontent among the ranks of the FBI and DoJ that there is a threat of mass retirements and whistle-blowing. Only the fear of a historical black-eye to the Obama legacy would cause the DoJ to indict Hillary Clinton.

The dem crooks in office love their criminals too much to do anything to them.

There is a rumor the FBI director may resign if there is a failure to prosecute.  Resembling the revolt of the admirals, when all of the navy admirals threatened to resign if Clinton made extremely severe cuts to the navy.  Of course, the navy officers had much more honor than most of Obama's sycophants.

When have the clintons ever been made to answer for their crimes?

How the FBI Could Force DOJ to Prosecute Hillary Clinton

By Jim Geraghty, The National Review

Could the Hillary Clinton e-mail saga end with FBI Director James Comey resigning in protest?

Ken Cuccinelli, the former attorney general of Virginia, knows the laws regarding classified information firsthand. In his private practice, Cuccinelli defended a Marine lieutenant colonel court martialed on charges of possessing such information outside a secure facility. He says Clinton’s actions in the e-mail scandal clearly satisfy all five requirements necessary to sustain charges of mishandling classified material, and constitute a breach perhaps even more glaring than the one for which General David Petraeus was convicted.

Like Petraeus, Clinton was clearly “an employee of the United States government.” Like Petraeus, Clinton obtained and created “documents and materials containing classified information” through her work at the State Department. In response to a Congressional inquiry earlier this month, I. Charles McCullough, III, the inspector general of the intelligence community, declared that an intelligence official examined “several dozen e-mails containing classified information determined . . . to be . . . CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, and TOP SECRET/SAP information” residing on Clinton’s server. (SAP is an acronym for ‘special access programs,’ a level of classification above top secret.)

Like Petraeus, Clinton “knowingly removed such documents or materials.” Cuccinelli points out that she actually committed this crime on a significant scale three separate times: First, by setting up her e-mail system to route messages to and through her unsecured server, then by moving the server to Platte River Networks, a private company, in June of 2013, and then by transferring the server’s contents to her private lawyers in 2014.