Help me out. During the first debate, Hillary said, "When I'm elected, the practice of sending a wounded vet home with a sack of opiates is over." I think I remember hearing that, but didn't remember hearing any comments for or against that statement. Do any of you remember that? If she said that, does that mean that the opiate addiction will be cured? If so, good.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
She probably meant that the wait would kill the vet before the opiates could be dispensed.
jtdavis posted:Help me out. During the first debate, Hillary said, "When I'm elected, the practice of sending a wounded vet home with a sack of opiates is over." I think I remember hearing that, but didn't remember hearing any comments for or against that statement. Do any of you remember that? If she said that, does that mean that the opiate addiction will be cured? If so, good.
I don't remember her saying that but, it's possible campaign promises are free.
Prescription opiates, when taken as prescribed, are the best pain killers available post-surgery. If you want to get angry, get angry that she is going to send home wounded soldiers with no pain medicine.
I took it to mean that she was not gonna send them home addicted to opiates. Fix the wounds, then get them off pain meds.
jtdavis posted:I took it to mean that she was not gonna send them home addicted to opiates. Fix the wounds, then get them off pain meds.
jt, you make it seem like that Hillary has a heart and actually cares.
jt, you make it seem like that Hillary has a heart and actually cares.
I'm not commenting on her heart, but on whether or not she wants to cure vets drug addiction.
jtdavis posted:jt, you make it seem like that Hillary has a heart and actually cares.
I'm not commenting on her heart, but on whether or not she wants to cure vets drug addiction.
She couldn't cure Bill's drug or sex additions. Why vets? Do you have a link to back up your claim she said it so we can see "the rest of the story", because if she said it, it was certainly not out of concern for the vets, which she and the rest of the Democrats hate.
Do you have a link to back up your claim she said it so we can see "the rest of the story", because if she said it, it was certainly not out of concern for the vets, which she and the rest of the Democrats hate.
As I said, I think I heard that on the first debate. I am a democrat and I am an honorably discharged veteran from the US Army. I can assure you that I do not hate myself or other vets. That statement about democrats hating vets is just a right wing lie.
jtdavis posted:Do you have a link to back up your claim she said it so we can see "the rest of the story", because if she said it, it was certainly not out of concern for the vets, which she and the rest of the Democrats hate.
As I said, I think I heard that on the first debate. I am a democrat and I am an honorably discharged veteran from the US Army. I can assure you that I do not hate myself or other vets. That statement about democrats hating vets is just a right wing lie.
You are an honorably discharged vet, you say. I would say if you are it's because you had no choice but to behave honorably. There was a time there were consequences for disruptive anti-American behavior in our military and elsewhere. That's changing more and more as the military hating, anti-American Democratic scum takes more offices, and slowly infiltrates the military so they can change and destroy it from within, and punish anyone that would dare stand up for, honor and protect this country. You just love to call others liars even with daily proof of the things the evil ******* Democrats are doing to tear down the country. It looks like you made up the story about Hillary caring about vets.
Well, I have searched all ways and can't find any place hilLIARy voiced any concern for vets. This must be a new demoslop tactic, trying to humanize the witch.
No results found for "In the first debate did Hillary say "When I'm elected, the practice of sending a wounded vet home with a sack of opiates is over.".
No question the demoslops hate the military and cops, all law enforcement. Think about it, they know it is imperative to bring down any one that might be a threat or a hindrance to them while they go about their plans to give the country over to foreign interests.
Best, I don't know how that got posted. I didn't post it. Someone hacked me.
jtdavis posted:Best, I don't know how that got posted. I didn't post it. Someone hacked me.
Was it the Russians?
uandurine posted:jtdavis posted:Best, I don't know how that got posted. I didn't post it. Someone hacked me.
Was it the Russians?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! They hacked hilliary and jt!
jtdavis posted:Best, I don't know how that got posted. I didn't post it. Someone hacked me.
I'm so sure you were hacked. Did you report it? What a moron you are. Somebody hacked you to make that one post and then what? "Unhacked" you?
Was it the Russians?
Sometimes I wish I was important enough for a foreign nation to care about me, other times, I'm glad I'm not.
BTW, the Russians are beating the war drums. Its mainly for internal consumption. They're highlighting the US as not an exemplar of a nation. Plus, a few other curious things. Their government has recommended, if not ordered, that all children of Russians, not just diplomatic corps, studying abroad, return to Russia, immediately, including the children of the oligarchs. It may be they are simply avoiding internal problems with people complaining about the children of the elites receiving a much better education. Or, Putin may be trying to get the children back in Russia to use as hostages against the oligarchs. He lost control of them, lately.
During the cold war, the Soviet high ups sent their children to Switzerland for an education. The Swiss encouraged it -- with their children and their secret bank accounts, the Russians would leave them alone.