Skip to main content

PHILIP GIRALDI

Executive Director, Council for the National Interest         4:39 PM 10/25/2017

 

 

How did Hillary & DNC Democrats Orchestrate it all?  and with Who else's help?

 We have now learned the Dossier was Bought & Paid for by Hillary and the Democrat National Committee. Using a Law Firm (Perkins Coie), so as, to help keep both Hillary Clinton & DNC “Hidden from Public View”, so-to-speak, in its connection to fabricated stories about Trump working with Russia. Also, aided them in the cover up, by having a Law firm claim “Client Privilege”, thus Law Firm, did not initially have to reveal who paid them. As Democrats and other Elitist tried to Tie Trump to Moscow on speculative, assumption information, giving leaks by left wing elitist, to media, for purpose of running a story as some kind of “Election Interference” by the Russians with Trump ties. (THE ULTAMATE FAKE NEWS) & Hillary, DNC, Law Firm -Dossier & Major Media as the Real Conspiracy Masters of Design.

  As the Truth is coming out, and as evidence mounting, points to ties directly to Hillary Clinton & Democrat National Committee as the Conspirators & Funder’s.   

  Trump has been legitimate in his Claims of “Fake News” about him and public being spoon fed by DNC Friendly major media, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, NYTimes, and you youngsters whose only News Source Programming you view is from  Late Night CBS Show w/ Stephen Colbert.

Law Firm was Perkins Coie:

A Washington lawyer named Marc Elias, whose firm Perkins Coie worked for both the DNC and Hillary, was the go-between on the arrangement, which began in April 2016 and continued until the election

The Story: Russiagate -The dossier was designed to dig up “dirt” on Trump and his associates, but, more to the point, it was clearly intended from the start to do so by manufacturing and nurturing a Russian angle. It sought to discredit Donald Trump and to deceive the public, which suggests that Trump has been right all along regarding something like a conspiracy against him which included the active participation of the FBI and possibly other national security agencies.

The president also comes across as credible vis-à-vis his critics because of what has become evident since the dossier was surfaced. The clearly politically motivated multiple investigations carried out so far in which no rock has been left unturned have come up with absolutely nothing, either in the form of criminal charges or in terms of actual collusion with a foreign government. And, one might add, there has been little in the way of evidence to sustain the charge that Russia sought to influence the election and might even have succeeded in doing so. But there is one thing new that we do know now: Russiagate began within the Clinton Campaign headquarters.

Phil Giraldi is a former CIA Case Officer and Army Intelligence Officer who spent 20 years overseas in Europe and the Middle East working terrorism cases.

Full Story:

http://dailycaller.com/2017/10...mpaign-headquarters/

 

Clintons.... The Most Corrupt Family in America....Bribery, Extortion, Kickbacks, Racketeering, on & on & on ... did I mention Liar or Uranium 1?

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

An 'un-named republican' commissioned the report, to start with. When they stopped paying, the company took the bill to the next reasonable source. Who cares who paid for the information. Look at what it states. Just like the 'leaks during the election', who cared who released the information. Look at the information.

SirWasabi posted:

Some information in the dossier has been confirmed. Several of Trump's cabinet members were proven to be corrupt as stated in the dossier, and yet you still refuse to look at the information. Republicans do love their un/mis-informed base.

What part of the dossier info?  One person in the cabinet, while not corrupt, did have conflicting associations that he did not inform the president of. 

You made claims the DNC and Clinton had the dossier made. You had to backtrack that to, the DNC and Clinton made up the 'Russia part'. Now, you've conceded that one of Trump's cabinet had a 'conflicting association', as described in the dossier.  And at the same time, asked what parts of the dossier info were confirmed? Is that where we are, really?

Last edited by SirWasabi
SirWasabi posted:

You made claims the DNC and Clinton had the dossier made. You had to backtrack that to, the DNC and Clinton made up the 'Russia part'. Now, you've conceded that one of Trump's cabinet had a 'conflicting association', as described in the dossier.  And at the same time, asked what parts of the dossier info were confirmed? Is that where we are, really?

Actually, I was quoting the Washington Post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com...m_term=.137a0de22e49

Perhaps, you should read before commenting.  

SirWasabi posted:

Why is it that every single discussion with every single Republican on every single forum results in 'Hillary' or 'Obama'?

At some point, doesn't Trump take responsibility? Obama , according to Republicans, was responsible from day ONE.

Yes, responsible for the worst economic recovery in over 100 years, for allowing ISIS to form and, then arm it.  Yes, he really was responsible.  Although, to be certain, Hillary advised him. 

direstraits posted:
SirWasabi posted:

You made claims the DNC and Clinton had the dossier made. You had to backtrack that to, the DNC and Clinton made up the 'Russia part'. Now, you've conceded that one of Trump's cabinet had a 'conflicting association', as described in the dossier.  And at the same time, asked what parts of the dossier info were confirmed? Is that where we are, really?

Actually, I was quoting the Washington Post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com...m_term=.137a0de22e49

Perhaps, you should read before commenting.  

Funny! The first sentence of that article is

"The Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research that resulted in a now-famous dossier containing allegations about President Trump’s connections to Russia and possible coordination between his campaign and the Kremlin, people familiar with the matter said."

So, as I said above. We're to the point that you've backtracked all the way to 'Hillary' and 'Obama'. It's safe to say you've contributed all you can to the topic and now wish to deflect. Thanks for showing exactly what lengths Republicans will go to ignore facts.

 

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×