Skip to main content

Al Qaeda hates Fox.  Liberals hate Fox.  Why!

 

"Just revealed: Osama bin Laden was told by al Qaeda’s U.S.-born media adviser Adam Gadahn about the best broadcast outlets to send an “anniversary video” commemorating the 9/11 terror attacks, according to Washington Post foreign affairs columnist David Ignatius in an analysis published Saturday of recently declassified material taken from bin Laden’s compound after his death last May.

 

“I was given an exclusive look at some of these remarkable documents by a senior administration official,” Mr. Ignatius explained.

 

The aforementioned video, Mr. Gadahn wrote to bin Laden, “should be sent for example to ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN and maybe PBS and VOA. As for Fox News let her die in her anger … From a professional point of view, they are all on one level — except [Fox News] channel, which falls into the abyss as you know, and lacks objectivity, too.”

 

“What an unintended boost for Fox, which can now boast that it is al Qaeda’s least favorite network,” Mr. Ignatius observed.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...-in-illinois/?page=1

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by interventor1212:

Ditzy,

 

Do you even know what you posted?  Or, did you read the thread?  CBS, NBC and ABC were named and are broadcast (OTA) networks.  However, so were CNN and PBS which aren't broadcast.  Fox Entertainment is also broadcast. However, Fox News is cable, like CNN.

 

 



I said,They only sent their vids to networks with OTA news broadcasts.

 

All have OTA news broadcasts except CNN and Fox

PBS is OTA.  I get all three channels at my house.

I have never had cable TV and cant imagine why anyone would to watch TV. 

"So, a US born "media advisor", even though he is working now for the bad guys, agrees that Fox News "falls into the abyss and lacks objectivity" and you guys think that is something to celebrate? Why? Any person with intelligence and guts enough to think for himself already knows all that."

 

It doesn't concern you that your belief system coincides with a confessed traitor, like Gadahn, does it!  Gadahn is only concerned with eliminating those who aren't of his belief. 

Originally Posted by interventor1212:

"So, a US born "media advisor", even though he is working now for the bad guys, agrees that Fox News "falls into the abyss and lacks objectivity" and you guys think that is something to celebrate? Why? Any person with intelligence and guts enough to think for himself already knows all that."

 

It doesn't concern you that your belief system coincides with a confessed traitor, like Gadahn, does it!  Gadahn is only concerned with eliminating those who aren't of his belief. 

___________________________________________________________________

Only a warped/twisted/or brainwashed mind could put that kind of spin on it. I mean Hitler liked chocolate ice cream. Does that mean the rest of us should hate it? The fact is, even if a bad guy likes it, chocolate ice cream is good.

 

And the fact is, even if a bad guy knows Fox News is a joke, it IS.

 

O No's post:

 

"Only a warped/twisted/or brainwashed mind could put that kind of spin on it. I mean Hitler liked chocolate ice cream. Does that mean the rest of us should hate it? The fact is, even if a bad guy likes it, chocolate ice cream is good.

 

And the fact is, even if a bad guy knows Fox News is a joke, it IS"

 

O No,

 

Your comparison of means of communication with ice cream, is a joke! Yes?  Use of the NSDAP is usually considered a violation of Godwin's law in argumentation, but I'll let it pass. 

 

Liberals have become so fixed upon the idea that Fox News is bad, that they can see no alternative argument.  Additionally, you've put yourself in even a tighter box -- accepting only AP feed or local papers.

 

Demonizing me as warped/twisted/ or brainwashed is another trick of the totalatarian mindset -- a method of de-humanizing one's opponents, justifying any means or methods against them.  Where did you learn that ploy/  Or, did it come naturally? 

 

I don't know, Chuck. I guess they read the AP Raw News too, and agree with me.

 

Think about it - I honestly DO only get my news there. Then *I* decide what it means. If I don't listen to spin from either side, I believe I have a better handle on the truth than someone who is spoon fed by those with an agenda.

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:
Originally Posted by interventor1212:

Ditzy,

 

Do you even know what you posted?  Or, did you read the thread?  CBS, NBC and ABC were named and are broadcast (OTA) networks.  However, so were CNN and PBS which aren't broadcast.  Fox Entertainment is also broadcast. However, Fox News is cable, like CNN.

 

 



I said,They only sent their vids to networks with OTA news broadcasts.

 

All have OTA news broadcasts except CNN and Fox

PBS is OTA.  I get all three channels at my house.

I have never had cable TV and cant imagine why anyone would to watch TV. 

 

Ditzy,

 

Didn't realize that you didn't receive cable.  You don't watch/can't watch Fox, but make judgments on them.  Rather like a eunuch claiming to be an expert on love making. 

Originally Posted by O No!:

No ploy, only the truth. As I said, if you'd rather have your news filtered through the mouths of people who are more than happy to tell you what to think, go for it. Just don't expect to be taken seriously by those of us who know how to think for ourselves.

So, far, I'm still reading liberal group think answers.  Call back when YOU can express an independent thought.

I love it. First, we have Ditzy, enthusiastic Fox News critic, who admits he can't even get Fox News. Then, we have O No, who hates Fox, but admits she gets all her news from AP feed, plus the local paper. Never considers outside sources, whether news, nor blog.

 

This is akin to the harem eunuch writing commentaries on Ovid's "Art of Love." Or, a Vestal Virgin giving marital advice.  There may be scholarly  writing, but there's neither passion, nor a knowledge of the actual details of the subject.

 

IAW, both are victims and carriers of Liberal Group Think -- living humans, carrying the Walking Dead virus.   

Originally Posted by interventor1212:

I love it. First, we have Ditzy, enthusiastic Fox News critic, who admits he can't even get Fox News. Then, we have O No, who hates Fox, but admits she gets all her news from AP feed, plus the local paper. Never considers outside sources, whether news, nor blog.

 

This is akin to the harem eunuch writing commentaries on Ovid's "Art of Love." Or, a Vestal Virgin giving marital advice.  There may be scholarly  writing, but there's neither passion, nor a knowledge of the actual details of the subject.

 

IAW, both are victims and carriers of Liberal Group Think -- living humans, carrying the Walking Dead virlus.   



Just read the Wall Street Journal.

It has the same slant as FoxNews and is much less annoying, but nonetheless completely partisan.

People that watch FoxNews are less intelligent  and less informed, thats just a fact.

 

http://www.comm.ohio-state.edu...ediaMosqueRumors.pdf

http://woods.stanford.edu/docs...Warming-Fox-News.pdf

http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/8148.pdf

http://www.worldpublicopinion....mation_Dec10_rpt.pdf

http://www.pipa.org/OnlineRepo...qMedia_Oct03_rpt.pdf

A review of all of Ditzy's linked sources show that failure to adhere to the liberal group think line was the reason cited for denigrating Fox News viewers. Ditzy's still carrying water for his cause, but won't/can't judge for himself.

 

As for the WSJ, yes, their editorial section is rather conservative.  They are a financial newspaper. God help those with liberal stockbrokers, financial analysts and accountants.  That's one area where you want conservatives, even if a liberal -- a mean, old man who will watch your money.

However, many of the articles take a rather liberal to moderate line.

Originally Posted by interventor1212:

"So, a US born "media advisor", even though he is working now for the bad guys, agrees that Fox News "falls into the abyss and lacks objectivity" and you guys think that is something to celebrate? Why? Any person with intelligence and guts enough to think for himself already knows all that."

 

It doesn't concern you that your belief system coincides with a confessed traitor, like Gadahn, does it!  Gadahn is only concerned with eliminating those who aren't of his belief. 

__

Even a confessed traitor has eyes, ears and reasoning ability and is thus able to recognize the bias of Faux News!

 

That particular confessed traitor apparently is more intelligent and perceptive than the millions of gullible sheeple who actually believe Faux News is "fair and balanced".

Ditzy's post:

 

"Idiotor, go handle some snakes.

Your ability to understand science is compromised by the fact that you're a moron. 

I mean that honestly and sincerely. "

 

Pitiful response from someone mired deep in liberal group think, lacking the ability of individual discernment.  Only time I ever handled poisonous snakes was in my youth. Results were hat bands, belts and a decent appetizer. 

 

What "discussion"? Kissing the feet of a traitor because he attacked fox news? Some "discussion". Goes to show once more how low the democrits are willing to go. You say too, "even a confessed traitor has eyes, ears and reasoning ability and is thus able to recognize the bias of Faux News!"  So I guess in your eyes that means he has reason to be a traitor. That's what's PITIFUL. Now if he attacks amish heaters and the mormons he'll really be a "great guy" in your eyes.

Interventor, you can stand there with your hands over your ears, stomping your feet and screaming, "So are you!!" all you want, but the fact is, I don't listen to spin, liberal or otherwise, while YOU get all your opinions spoon fed to you by your right wing blogs, radio shows, and tv.

 

So stomp and scream away, but the fact remains that I am thinking for myself while you are not. Sorry. That's just the way it is.

O No,

 

Sorry, No!  You can't think for yourself if you limit your input, while indulging in liberal group think.   If, it provides you with any relief, I do find your responses slightly more amusing than the rest of the liberal band.   Old contendah and Ditzy are having conniption fits.  I know its effective when they lose it.

 

I find using a number of sources, some of which I trust because I know the authors, to be more reliable than your limited range.  

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×