L. Cranston posted:

Republicans are upset that Democrats are willing to do the same things Republicans do, daily.

Clutch the pearls.

Again, where do you get this from?  All I have ever heard said from Republicans, before Trump, regarding the pick of a Supreme Court Justice is one that will rule based upon the Constitution.    Trump has been lambasted by the media and the Democrats for saying, during his 2016 campaign,  he would pick judges that would overturn Roe vs Wade or support the right to bear arms etc... Why is there not the same anger and protesting when a Democrat makes a similar statement indicating that they will only support and name a judge that will rule in a certain way with regard to an issue?  If it's not right for Donald Trump to do it then it should be likewise for Democrats.  

A judge should not be political (even though it doesn't work out that way) and rule based upon the Constitution.  Politicians, today, seem more to want to predetermine the outcome of cases based on their own agenda.

Republicans put Justices on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v Wade. That's no secret. Why would it even be a topic, on these forums, that Democrats would chose Justices who would preserve Roe v Wade???

Where do you Republicans get your hypocrisy? You seem to have a limitless supply.

L. Cranston posted:
Jack Hammer posted:
I'm going to take a guess here and say from around age nine cranky
never caught on. Eighty years out of the loop and still hasn't figured
it out. Zombies/liberals, same thing, watch where you step.

Did your mother have any children with live brain cells?

Which one..?

Jack Hammer posted:
L. Cranston posted:
Jack Hammer posted:
I'm going to take a guess here and say from around age nine cranky
never caught on. Eighty years out of the loop and still hasn't figured
it out. Zombies/liberals, same thing, watch where you step.

Did your mother have any children with live brain cells?

Which one..?

Brain cells or mothers?
(I rest my case.)

L. Cranston posted:

Republicans had to cater to the Religious Right in order to win elections. Roe v. Wade is just the fallout from that deal. Never mind the consequences. Just scream about Democrats killing babies and it'll all be just fine.

So Republicans are the only one to cater to a specific group in order to win an election by appealing to issues specifically important to those specific groups?  Not wise throwing rocks when you live in a glass house.  I think most people realize, and recognize, that political parties, and candidates, cater and patronize certain groups and actually even compete to each group for their support.  Like Teachers Unions, other various Unions, NRA, Climate Change advocates, Religious groups including Christians, Muslims, and Jews.  Then there are the minorities.   I guess you missed the speech that Hillary Clinton made to a Black America group in Selma, AL seeking their support.  The one where she so obviously changed her voice and tried to speak like she felt they spoke.  If a Republican had done that Comedians would have lambasted them night and day for months not to mention they might not have gotten out of town without a lynching for an obviously horrible accent.  The only reason Hillary wasn't confronted over it is they were supporters of Hillary.

gbrk posted:
L. Cranston posted:

Republicans had to cater to the Religious Right in order to win elections. Roe v. Wade is just the fallout from that deal. Never mind the consequences. Just scream about Democrats killing babies and it'll all be just fine.

So Republicans are the only one to cater to a specific group in order to win an election by appealing to issues specifically important to those specific groups?  Not wise throwing rocks when you live in a glass house.  I think most people realize, and recognize, that political parties, and candidates, cater and patronize certain groups and actually even compete to each group for their support.  Like Teachers Unions, other various Unions, NRA, Climate Change advocates, Religious groups including Christians, Muslims, and Jews.  Then there are the minorities.   I guess you missed the speech that Hillary Clinton made to a Black America group in Selma, AL seeking their support.  The one where she so obviously changed her voice and tried to speak like she felt they spoke.  If a Republican had done that Comedians would have lambasted them night and day for months not to mention they might not have gotten out of town without a lynching for an obviously horrible accent.  The only reason Hillary wasn't confronted over it is they were supporters of Hillary.

The topic at hand is 'Roe v. Wade' and picking judges who support it. I centered my reply around the topic of the discussion. You , however, decided to write a rant about Hillary and why Republicans don't get support from minorities?

Clinton Derangement Syndrome can be helped.

The first step is to switch off the Fox News Entertainment propaganda.

 

Jack Hammer posted:

The first step is to stop crying like a sugar teat baby and stay loose

or stay under the porch, some people waste more time whining than

talking* Duh 

If you don't like what I post, why do you follow me around the forums and make posts? hahahahahaha!

L. Cranston posted:
Jack Hammer posted:

Would you want I to post all your trolling's of my posts ?

I like it when you do your liberal "haha" thing, really works for you

Do I have to buy a Republican decoder ring to translate that rabble or is it just more babble from an idiot.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yea, buy the ring, you're that stupid and all the help keeping up
as you can have has never hurt the dummies. 
Jack Hammer posted:
L. Cranston posted:
Jack Hammer posted:

Would you want I to post all your trolling's of my posts ?

I like it when you do your liberal "haha" thing, really works for you

Do I have to buy a Republican decoder ring to translate that rabble or is it just more babble from an idiot.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yea, buy the ring, you're that stupid and all the help keeping up
as you can have has never hurt the dummies. 

I don't think a decoder ring or a grammar book could help translate that!

How about you take your time and string some words together that make a complete sentence.

Jack Hammer posted:
L. Cranston posted:
Jack Hammer posted:

Would you want I to post all your trolling's of my posts ?

I like it when you do your liberal "haha" thing, really works for you

Do I have to buy a Republican decoder ring to translate that rabble or is it just more babble from an idiot.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yea, buy the ring, you're that stupid and all the help keeping up
as you can have has never hurt the dummies. 

See why I blocked this idiot.  No use arguing with quantum stupidity. 

direstraits posted:
Jack Hammer posted:
L. Cranston posted:
Jack Hammer posted:

Would you want I to post all your trolling's of my posts ?

I like it when you do your liberal "haha" thing, really works for you

Do I have to buy a Republican decoder ring to translate that rabble or is it just more babble from an idiot.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yea, buy the ring, you're that stupid and all the help keeping up
as you can have has never hurt the dummies. 

See why I blocked this idiot.  No use arguing with quantum stupidity. 

Poor Liarstraights. I'd block someone who made me look like a fool every single day, too.

Add Reply

Likes (0)
Post

×
×
×
×