quote:
Originally posted by Peter Rielly:
End times are some of the toughest to grasp fully...(.........) So the earth in it's entirety will not be destroy... it's all the thing OF the earth... It's God's way of renovating the joint. lol
Gonna be a rough time though.. ruuuuffff time.
There are other things.. like pre-trib, post-trib... rapture or no rapture... but the whole fire thing... yep, that's a definate.
Interesting. Let's recap: I stated my case pretty clearly and with Biblical authority that God clearly indicated that he would never destroy the earth again. You responded that God was a bit of a sheister and actually stated that he would never FLOOD the earth again.
So I asked for a clarification and you said,
"quote:
Originally posted by Sofa King:
So Let me get this straight: God does plan to destroy the earth?
And you said, "Yes."
Now that I've pointed out the contradiction, you state that, "So the earth in it's entirety will not be destroy... it's all the thing OF the earth... It's God's way of renovating the joint" making your previous comment either a lie or an expression of ignorance.
This logical fallacy is called "moving the goalpost." When caught in a contradiction, the fundamentalist will simply use the omnipotency of our Lord to simply make another illogical claim that leap-frogs the previous illogical claim.
The only LOGICAL answer? The Bible was written inspired by God but written by man and thus polluted the Word. You'd sound a little more credible if you said, "Well, honestly I don't know but /I/ believe thusly but you can believe what you wish.
Instead you reply, "but the whole fire thing... yep, that's a definate."
No, it's not definite at all. You simply believe that in spite of contradictory information. It kind of calls into question your credibility, honesty and knowledge of your faith.