Hell to the Naw

quote:

Originally posted by ferrellj:

quote:

Originally posted by thenagel:

quote:

Originally posted by JimiHendrix:

quote:

Originally posted by thenagel:

quote:

Originally posted by JimiHendrix:
The reason that elections cost so much is because the truth is no longer important to voters. Candidates have to sold just like soap and corn flakes. If the voters were intelligent and informed, there would no need for so much outrageous spending. The amount spent on the Presidential election is not the fault of those who are running. It is the fault of the voters, and, most probably, the very voters who will complain the most about how much it costs.

i think the fault lies in both places, more or less equally.
and since i was complaining about the cost, that reads liek a shot aimed at me... if not, never mind, but if so, how is it my fault? more so than, say, you?

Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean that they are not OUT TO GET YOU! If you start worrying about whether or not a shot is aimed at you, you will need to find a better way to waste your free time.

it was question for clarification...
i'm not paranoid, and i'm certainly not worried... i just wasn't clear on what you were saying..

I'm never clear on what he's saying.

quote:

Originally posted by JimiHendrix:

quote:

Originally posted by ferrellj:

quote:

Originally posted by thenagel:

quote:

Originally posted by JimiHendrix:

quote:

Originally posted by thenagel:

quote:

Originally posted by JimiHendrix:
The reason that elections cost so much is because the truth is no longer important to voters. Candidates have to sold just like soap and corn flakes. If the voters were intelligent and informed, there would no need for so much outrageous spending. The amount spent on the Presidential election is not the fault of those who are running. It is the fault of the voters, and, most probably, the very voters who will complain the most about how much it costs.

i think the fault lies in both places, more or less equally.
and since i was complaining about the cost, that reads liek a shot aimed at me... if not, never mind, but if so, how is it my fault? more so than, say, you?

Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean that they are not OUT TO GET YOU! If you start worrying about whether or not a shot is aimed at you, you will need to find a better way to waste your free time.

it was question for clarification...
i'm not paranoid, and i'm certainly not worried... i just wasn't clear on what you were saying..

I'm never clear on what he's saying.

OF course not. We have already established your reading disability.

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Dittohead:
They need to know that they can raise $500million from corp donors or they wont get the $800million it will take to beat OBamas $1,000million.

quote:

Originally posted by The Propagandist:

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Dittohead:
They need to know that they can raise $500million from corp donors or they wont get the $800million it will take to beat OBamas $1,000million.

OBamas $1,000million, you say?

Wow, that much already? Appears to be a lot of support there for keeping him on for the next four years.

quote:

Originally posted by Kenny Powers:
Wasn't Goldman Sachs Obama's largest donor in 2010? I find it comical that people get so worked up over the differences in the 2 major political parties when they are beholden to the same group of donors.

quote:

Originally posted by Opie Cunningham:

quote:

Originally posted by Kenny Powers:
Wasn't Goldman Sachs Obama's largest donor in 2010? I find it comical that people get so worked up over the differences in the 2 major political parties when they are beholden to the same group of donors.

What gave you that idea?

quote:

Originally posted by JimiHendrix:

quote:

Originally posted by Opie Cunningham:

quote:

Originally posted by Kenny Powers:
Wasn't Goldman Sachs Obama's largest donor in 2010? I find it comical that people get so worked up over the differences in the 2 major political parties when they are beholden to the same group of donors.

That's funny coming from you.

What gave you that idea?

Glen Beck disease. When you don't have facts to back up your side, just make some up.

quote:

Originally posted by JimiHendrix:

quote:

Originally posted by Opie Cunningham:

quote:

Originally posted by Kenny Powers:
Wasn't Goldman Sachs Obama's largest donor in 2010? I find it comical that people get so worked up over the differences in the 2 major political parties when they are beholden to the same group of donors.

What gave you that idea?

Glen Beck disease. When you don't have facts to back up your side, just make some up.