Skip to main content

High on Hate?

By Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich & Nader Bagherzadeh

Left without a pretext for a military assault on Iran, the Bush administration finds itself in a position where it needs to prepare the world opinion for mass genocide with a compelling reason. With its control over the media, it is accomplishing this by denouncing Iran as the killer of American troops while causing civil unrest in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17877.htm
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by interventor:
You pasted a link on supposed one million dead Iraqis a couple of weeks ago. When I stated facts and asked for counter arguments, you stated it was only the link, not your statement.

OK, now you have made the statement and I see no counter to my statement on the impossibility of the such casualties. Pony up!



What statement did I make? Refresh me on my statement please.
quote:
Originally posted by interventor:
pba,

Same old delusional ravings -- just left out the word - joows. Come on, get some new material.

Notice you now claim one million Iraqi dead, now you're smoking Willie weed.

The old claim of 655,000 was patently false. It works out to 500 per day for the time period claimed. During WW II, the US lost 300 per day on average for a total of 405,000. The 300 per day was in the most intense combat ever experienced by the US military. Men flew thru flak; walked, crawled or ran into machine gun fire, artillery fire and mine fields; were bombed and torpedoed; and thru land crawling with malaria and yellow fever to attain the 300 per day.

The 655,000 was based on a cluster sample, my stat sampling professor at CUNY would have flunked me for proposing. It was a telephone sample in a country where only the Ba'athist had phones -- remember the sample that predicted Wilkie winning the presidency, when most phones belonged to Republicans?

Lastly, where are the bodies? Saddam's killing fields of 300,000 to 400,000 discovered so far, are in about 300 mass graves. From the ones I've seen, the grave sites are size of football fields.

Does someone have disintegrator guns or, perhaps, you believe ovens are located in the desert?
________________________________________________



Yeah right! I think you know better! First of all I only posted the article I did not write the article and have not said one way or the other if I agree or disagree.

____________________________________________

Like I said!
quote:
Originally posted by interventor:
quote:
Originally posted by interventor:
pba,

Same old delusional ravings -- just left out the word - joows. Come on, get some new material.

Notice you now claim one million Iraqi dead, now you're smoking Willie weed.

The old claim of 655,000 was patently false. It works out to 500 per day for the time period claimed. During WW II, the US lost 300 per day on average for a total of 405,000. The 300 per day was in the most intense combat ever experienced by the US military. Men flew thru flak; walked, crawled or ran into machine gun fire, artillery fire and mine fields; were bombed and torpedoed; and thru land crawling with malaria and yellow fever to attain the 300 per day.

The 655,000 was based on a cluster sample, my stat sampling professor at CUNY would have flunked me for proposing. It was a telephone sample in a country where only the Ba'athist had phones -- remember the sample that predicted Wilkie winning the presidency, when most phones belonged to Republicans?

Lastly, where are the bodies? Saddam's killing fields of 300,000 to 400,000 discovered so far, are in about 300 mass graves. From the ones I've seen, the grave sites are size of football fields.

Does someone have disintegrator guns or, perhaps, you believe ovens are located in the desert?
________________________________________________



Yeah right! I think you know better! First of all I only posted the article I did not write the article and have not said one way or the other if I agree or disagree.

____________________________________________

Like I said!




What are you saying to me here? I am not sure what you're saying. I did not write the article I did post it and at that time I had not agree or disagree. Are you asking me if I agree with it?

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×