Hitler's Parents Claim Judge Found No Abuse of Little Adolf, Aryan Nation

Both a New Jersey court and a Court of Appeals ruled that there was sufficient evidence of abuse in the home to take the children.  Is it surprising that two people who think naming their children this way is a good idea are also so stupid they don't understand what the court is telling them?  Obviously two people with mental problems.  I feel sorry for their children, and hope they are not permanently damaged by their nutso parents.©

It's an odd story. Who has the right to tell parents what to name their kids, and what goes on in the minds of parents that would name their child adolf hitler?

Nobody, unless you live in The Netherlands.  But that isn't why their children were taken away.

It turns out that it was the reason crusty. Didn't you read the story? No abuse found but they won't return the kids. I remember the first time the story was in the news and they claimed the names the abuse.

I read the story.  That no abuse was found is what the parents are saying.  The courts - two of them - are saying differently.  ©

"While the Campbells maintained from the beginning that the only reason their children were taken away is because of their given names, New Jersey court documents stated last year that there was alleged abuse and parental incompetence.

A New Jersey appeals court ruled in August 2010 that there was sufficient evidence of abuse or neglect because of domestic violence in the home, and though there was a gag order for both parties in the case (which the Campbells have broken multiple times to deny the allegations), authorities have stated in the past that putting the children into the foster system had nothing to do with their names."

Stupid isn't illegal, but abuse is.

The names could only be more abusive if they were "Kick Me" and "Ima Holina."

Here's the site I was talking about.

http://newyork.ibtimes.com/art...tody-battle-****.htm

It all started when Heath and Deborah Campbell of New Jersey were denied a request to put their son's name- Adolf Hitler-on a birthday cake in 2008. The couple said they gave their son a ****-inspired name because they thought it was unique

I've read this article three times now, not reading it again.  It is poor journalism.  The parents say they were cleared, but their original case ends up in appeals court - which means they lost their case in lower court.  The article says: "an appeals court ruled against preventing them from getting custody of their children after sufficient evidence of abuse and neglect had been found in the home."  How much clearer do you need it?  Mother says Adolph is sweet.  "Sweet" Adolph runs around threatening to kill people.  People that know the family say husband is abusive to wife. 

You've gotten as bad as Bill.  No matter how many times you post it, it says the same thing.

 I'm not taking up for anyone here. I said it was an odd case and that is the only reason I posted it. Odd on the hand that anyone would name their children such names, and odd that ONLY after the "cake" incident would someone claim abuse. I think any damage to the children over the names has already been done, and again, because it is such an odd case it makes me wonder just what they think they can do about it now. People stick children with all sorts of stupid names, it's like they're naming dogs instead of children. You just wonder what they're thinking when they do that stuff.

This is a VERY DANGEROUS case in that it sets a precident for possible future 'abuse' by the courts to remove children from homes IF THE COURTS don't agree with the way the parents are raising children. What's next: removing kids from homes that teach their children to defend thenselves, rather than be a victim, or perhaps teach Christianity over Islam? Where will it stop?