Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by thenagel:
I'm not trying to avoid talking about it.
you want to talk about it? let's talk about it!

Prove to me, without useing (sic) the bible, that the bible is 100% truth.

Hi Nagel,

Okay, I will do that when you can prove your science WITHOUT using your science books.

You say that nature proves science.

Yet, most folks will tell you that nature is a great proof of God and His Creation.

Keep in mind that God created the sciences; the sciences did not create God. The created cannot be greater than the Creator.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1_-_Bible-History-Book-1a
quote:
Originally posted by rolltidequeen:
Well by george sign me up for the club of stupidity because I believe in Creationism. Big Grin And let me go on to FURTHER to say that Jesus is the one and ONLY way to Heaven.

John 14:6 Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Stated by Jesus himself. Not just a great Man but God Himself. Yes HE is the ONLY WAY. Now how is THAT for a little bit of honesty Smiler

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Amen_Animated
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
quote:
Originally posted by thenagel:
I'm not trying to avoid talking about it.
you want to talk about it? let's talk about it!

Prove to me, without useing (sic) the bible, that the bible is 100% truth.

Hi Nagel,

Okay, I will do that when you can prove your science WITHOUT using your science books.

You say that nature proves science.


No i don't.

remember, i believe that God created the universe..

quote:

Yet, most folks will tell you that nature is a great proof of God and His Creation.

Keep in mind that God created the sciences; the sciences did not create God. The created cannot be greater than the Creator.

Bill


Yup. i agree with that. i've said that.
what was it you wanted me to prove?
OK, I for one have come to the conclusion that the bible is not "pure crap." The bible is simply a collection of stories that have been bent and twisted to suit the immediate needs of whoever was in charge at the time the revisions were made. Not accurate, but probably not crap.

I AM convinced however, that BeeGee's INTERPRETATION of it is "pure crap."
From what I can see,
Like the others before him-he's revising it to suit the needs of a scared, old man who suddenly wants to get into heaven after a lifetime of sinning.
quote:
Originally posted by Road Puppy:
OK, I for one have come to the conclusion that the bible is not "pure crap." The bible is simply a collection of stories that have been bent and twisted to suit the immediate needs of whoever was in charge at the time the revisions were made. Not accurate, but probably not crap.

I AM convinced however, that BeeGee's INTERPRETATION of it is "pure crap."
From what I can see,
Like the others before him-he's revising it to suit the needs of a scared, old man who suddenly wants to get into heaven after a lifetime of sinning.


I can get behind all of this.


I misspoke when talking to bill.. i was trying to say that if the proof of something's validity is that it tells you it's valid, it should set off a warning for you to question it's validity more throughly than normal.

but, i messed up, and phrased it in a way that said something i wasn't intending.
Ah well. i said it, so i'm gonna go with it,
if you look at the bible as a set of ' morality tales', even while disbelieving any trace of the divine, they can be good stories. bloody murder, rape, betrayal, mayhem, sex, incest and all that good made for tv movie type stuff...
quote:
Originally posted by thenagel:
quote:
Originally posted by Road Puppy:
OK, I for one have come to the conclusion that the bible is not "pure crap." The bible is simply a collection of stories that have been bent and twisted to suit the immediate needs of whoever was in charge at the time the revisions were made. Not accurate, but probably not crap. I AM convinced however, that BeeGee's INTERPRETATION of it is "pure crap." From what I can see, Like the others before him - he's revising it to suit the needs of a scared, old man who suddenly wants to get into heaven after a lifetime of sinning.

I can get behind all of this. I misspoke when talking to bill.. i was trying to say that if the proof of something's validity is that it tells you it's valid, it should set off a warning for you to question it's validity more thoroughly than normal. but, i messed up, and phrased it in a way that said something i wasn't intending. Ah well. i said it, so i'm gonna go with it, if you look at the bible as a set of ' morality tales', even while disbelieving any trace of the divine, they can be good stories. bloody murder, rape, betrayal, mayhem, sex, incest and all that good made for tv movie type stuff...

Hi all,

Here we have a good example of Ying and Yang patting each other on the back and telling one another that God does not exist and that the Bible is NOT the Written Word of God.

But, I have a challenge for my Friends, Ying and Yang -- show me in Scripture where I have misquoted or misinterpreted Scripture.

Any mule can bray and make accusations. But, it takes a wee bit of intelligence to say, "This is where you are wrong -- and this is why what you have said is wrong." Now, since I quote Scripture and they are telling me that my Scripture quotes are wrong -- the ONLY way to intelligently show me the error -- is to show me from Scripture.

However, waiting for them to be able to do this -- is like waiting for the Titanic to refloat itself.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Mad-Mule-1
One person's truth is another person's fantasy or lunacy but when it comes down to it none of us, none, has innate knowledge of how we got here, how creation got here or about eternity but rather we all have FAITH. What is important is what your basis of Faith is.

You regard evolution as undeniable truth and discount anyone that believes in Creation as some type of lunatic or stupid person. We who believe in Creation believe ( have Faith ) that the God we believe in brought about Creation by His supernatural powers whether it be snapped fingers, literal words spoken or the thoughts of God. We have Faith that is the process by which it happened.

You, and other evolutionist, have Faith in what you have either read in some text book, heard some High School or College professor state or something similar to that. You have faith in the words of a man about a theory that a third person has.

If that "truth" is so compelling then you should have no problem in some basic explanation of this truth so what is the basis of your Faith? Share with us how all this happened without having to retort to saying we should read this or that work. It is yours to defend your position when ask, defend your basis of your faith.

I have stated my disbelief in Evolution because of the glaring missing evidence of Evolution such as the lack of existence of transitional beings within each species. Incremental transitional states of monkeys to man or other species. I have said many times that if it's true and happens of it's own then it should be evident before us now and happening right now before us with 1/2 man and 1/2 monkeys walking around. 90% man and 10% monkey walking around and alive, not in fossils but alive and existing now. The "missing link" should be alive and visible today. Rather than explain this glaring absence of these transitional beings evolutionist attempt to deflect the thoughts to saying people just don't have the understanding to comprehend evolution ( as taught by it's initial advocates, such as Darwin, or by contemporaries who somehow elaborate upon Darwin's theories with some modifications for problems with the initial theory, Contemporaries such as Dawkins. Is there proof of Evolution ... YES! but NOT as the source of creation and how we got here!

Yes I'm a professing Christian who believes in God and Creation but my disbelief of Evolution is not based upon Religion but rather the above facts that the evidence just doesn't hold up except for people with biased blinders on who rebel against those that point out problems with Evolution as if Evolution was Religion and God itself. Evolution isn't accepted because it's real or true but because those in control and supervisory positions control the playing field, control what is allowed to be presented in a tyrannical manner by elimination of those that present a counter theory either by using the "Separation of Church and State" argument or by firing those that propose another theory as documented by Ben Stein in "Expelled".


Again if you have FAITH in something then you should be able to support your basis of your faith. In this case it is evolution as the basis by which we got here so if you believe it as indisputable truth then explain, in terms us simpletons can understand, just how all this happened?

Faith is what it is ... Evolutionist have faith in a man ( a man's theory ) whereas Christians (most of them) have faith in God, as initial creator and document their basis of their faith with the Scriptures. If you don't accept the Scriptures as true or a source of truth then what are your sources of "truth", can you itemize them? If not then your faith is truly shallow.


The topic of this thread is "Honesty Needed" but whose truth, a biased truth? Maybe what is needed is another reading of the definition of "Arrogance" or what it is to be arrogant. I know what I believe and have no problem voicing or printing a response, about what, and why, I believe. I don't force that on anyone and more important I don't go attempting to defend my position by demeaning those who have conflicting views or opinions and beliefs. I don't attempt to decry someones intelligence (or, perception of, lack of it) as some atheist have no problem doing to those who take opposing views to their own.
Last edited by gbrk
Hi Dustin,

While I realize that you often have a problem explaining yourself; this time, please give it a try. For the life of me, I have tried to understand the message of your graphics -- but, it eludes me.

If you are saying that I liked girls when I was 9; you are right. And, when I was 10, 15, 25 -- 55, and although I have been happily married for almost 33 years -- I still enjoy the company of ladies -- Christian fellowship only.

True, I post a lot of graphics. But, I do believe my graphics are usually pretty self-explanatory. If not, what is the purpose?

So, just jump in there, my Friend, and explain yours to us.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1_-__Snoopy_Running
quote:
none, [sic] has innate knowledge of how we got here,
So far, so good. Why would we have innate knowledge of that? The knowledge of our origins and development has come about through a lot of hard scientific work.

quote:
You regard evolution as undeniable truth and discount anyone that believes in Creation as some type of lunatic or stupid person.
Right again! So far, you're batting 1000.

quote:
You, and other evolutionist [sic], have Faith in what you have either read in some text book, heard some High School or College professor state or something similar to that.
Imagine that. It's called "learning". The people who've spent their lives discovering the history and nature of life might have something to teach us.

quote:
I have stated my disbelief in Evolution because of the glaring missing evidence of Evolution such as the lack of existence of transitional beings within each species.
I'm bowled over. You're right, mate. If every species cannot demonstrate every transitional being between every demonstrable state, then evolution is obviously wrong. How many points does it take to determine a line?

quote:
Incremental transitional states of monkeys to man or other species. I have said many times that if it's true and happens of it's own then it should be evident before us now and happening right now before us with 1/2 man and 1/2 monkeys walking around.
You don't know the first thing about biology, do you?

quote:
90% man and 10% monkey walking around and alive, not in fossils but alive and existing now.
That would be you, luv. You're an ape. A Great Ape, to be sure, but an ape, nonetheless. You get a banana, now.

quote:
The "missing link" should be alive and visible today. Rather than explain this glaring absence of these transitional beings evolutionist attempt to deflect the thoughts to saying people just don't have the understanding to comprehend evolution ( as taught by it's initial advocates, such as Darwin, or by contemporaries who somehow elaborate upon Darwin's theories with some modifications for problems with the initial theory, Contemporaries such as Dawkins.
We have such a specimen. It's you. We came from different forms, and we will eventually evolve into yet different forms. You are an intermediate species. You ape, you.

quote:
Is there proof of Evolution ... YES! but NOT as the source of creation and how we got here!
Bravo! You got something right!

quote:
Yes I'm a professing Christian who believes in God and Creation but my disbelief of Evolution is not based upon Religion but rather the above facts that the evidence just doesn't hold up except for people with biased blinders on who rebel against those that point out problems with Evolution as if Evolution was Religion and God itself.
Punctuation, my dear friend, punctuation. And, if I may suggest, a bit or grammatical education, especially regarding run-on sentences. If you base your beliefs on the "facts" you presented earlier, then you're in a world of hurt. Your facts are nothing of the sort, they are the fiction of Creationists who want to make sure their followers stay ignorant.

Let's continue, this is fun.

quote:
Evolution isn't accepted because it's real or true but because those in control and supervisory positions control the playing field, control what is allowed to be presented in a tyrannical manner by elimination of those that present a counter theory either by using the "Separation of Church and State" argument or by firing those that propose another theory as documented by Ben Stein in "Expelled".

OK. You have me here. Yes, I know evolution is a conspiracy. Ben Stein laid waste to us. We're devastated. Busted. Laid low. Not. Was it you I invited to research the arguments against that silly film? If not, please do so, you might be amused.

The "Separation of Church and State" argument.... LMAO! It's hardly an argument! It's given, it's fundamentalist politics. What a maroon!

Er, excuse me, let's continue.

quote:
The topic of this thread is "Honesty Needed" but whose truth, a biased truth?
No, the honest truth. You don't have it.

The honest truth comes from following the evidence where it leads. You are incapable of doing that. You start with a conclusion and then you try to force the square pegs of evidence into the oblong holes of religion. You've been doing it for at least 1700 years and we're tired of it, we're tired of your lies, your browbeating, your groundless faith, your coercions, and especially your baseless self-righteousness.

Where do you get off? Because we'd like our world back, if you please.
quote:
I have stated my disbelief in Evolution because of the glaring missing evidence of Evolution such as the lack of existence of transitional beings within each species. Incremental transitional states of monkeys to man or other species. I have said many times that if it's true and happens of it's own then it should be evident before us now and happening right now before us with 1/2 man and 1/2 monkeys walking around. 90% man and 10% monkey walking around and alive, not in fossils but alive and existing now. The "missing link" should be alive and visible today. Rather than explain this glaring absence of these transitional beings evolutionist attempt to deflect the thoughts to saying people just don't have the understanding to comprehend evolution ( as taught by it's initial advocates, such as Darwin, or by contemporaries who somehow elaborate upon Darwin's theories with some modifications for problems with the initial theory, Contemporaries such as Dawkins. Is there proof of Evolution ... YES! but NOT as the source of creation and how we got here!

Yes I'm a professing Christian who believes in God and Creation but my disbelief of Evolution is not based upon Religion but rather the above facts that the evidence just doesn't hold up except for people with biased blinders on who rebel against those that point out problems with Evolution as if Evolution was Religion and God itself. Evolution isn't accepted because it's real or true but because those in control and supervisory positions control the playing field, control what is allowed to be presented in a tyrannical manner by elimination of those that present a counter theory either by using the "Separation of Church and State" argument or by firing those that propose another theory as documented by Ben Stein in "Expelled".



This reads like a Glenn Beck rant. You inject a bit of pseudo-"logical" retort and use the classic "no half monkey-man" to my great amusement. Rarely, if ever has there been such a classic Scopes Trial prosecution pronouncement
issued as "argument."

However, no flat earther, even one with so gross misunderstanding of Darwin and the Leakeys as you, should go untrumped -- hence the conspiracy theory to round out the sheer bovine feces.

Have you ever even read Origin of Species? Ben Stein as religious or science authority? Now that one takes the cake!

Have you joined the Bill Gray Fan Club? Surely not that!

Could we next learn about the FEMA concentration and/or death camps?
Last edited by Aude Sapere
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
For the life of me, I have tried to understand the message of your graphics -- but, it eludes me.

If you are saying that I liked girls when I was 9; you are right. And, when I was 10, 15, 25 -- 55, and although I have been happily married for almost 33 years -- I still enjoy the company of ladies -- Christian fellowship only.

Bill


Huh? What?

Stop playing dumb. Everyone in your life has known about you what YOU have ignored about yourself for your entire life. Go re-read your response to my cartoon (the one where you pretend to not know what it means). Trying to prove something, are we?

You're a homosexual, Bill.

Oh, on a side note -- it's not shown in my little cartoon, but the other little boys were playing baseball on the playground that day. You were skipping rope. Remember that day?

Dustin

Ah Billy Joe Bob Gene, you Evolutionist, here and other places, are a classic bunch.

You fail to address direct questions with substantial answers yet you retort to defamation and slander, against fellow forum members, attempting to demean the character, or intelligence of another as your chief argument. You have to resort to personal attacks on those that take a different stance from your own. You have no depth to your own beliefs and lack the tools to refute an opposing argument so you try and defer attention by your personal attacks upon another forum member, whether it be that members education, intelligence, or grammar. Surely you are a better person than that? Maybe not. Could very well be the very reason you have to re-enter this forum room under a new name because your character has not changed rather just morphs into another forum name with the same ole biases, attacks and slanders .

You do no credit to yourself or your argument but rather show your own inadequacies by your personal attacks rather than actually answer what you are ask. You certainly are not in a position to make judgments about honesty when you can't even retain your original forum name due to your prior actions, with regards to your interaction with other forum members in this forum. Could it be your intent is less than admirable and you seek not discussion but rather a podium from which to spew your biased remarks? How does that correlate with Honesty or being Honest?

As for Aude,

I do, from time to time, catch Glenn Beck, and while he presents, what many view as, rants most everything he says has yet to be proven false and I've yet to hear anyone substantially refute his statements or disprove his allegations regarding the associations he makes. There is though much biased and prejudiced remarks about him from people who take things second hand and don't actually care to take the time to listen or research what he alleges. They rather take what another says about him and what he alleges and then go on a tear against him, similar to a mob mentality where you have followers that just join in for the sake of joining in without substantial first hand knowledge either way.

Also I never claimed Ben Stein as a "Religious or scientific authority" but rather as a person who documented, and reported on, actions of scientist and educators, from a pro-evolutionist position, and their discrimination and actions against other scientist and instructors who dared to, just, take a position to present counter arguments to the established evolutionist theory. Please don't do as most liberals, do to conservatives, and twist their (my) words into something totally different from what they (I) said.

I have only stated the reasons for my disbelief in Evolution and yet the only retort that I have received is to demean my intelligence, personal attacks, or suggestions, as you made, to read "Origin of Species".

Again it's not my place to prove or disprove evolution using any pro-evolutionist material. I have stated one of my objections to the theory and one reason why I cannot accept it yet the defenders of the evolutionist theory seem incapable of explaining or defending the discrepancies I have cited but rather spend their efforts in attempting to re-direct the discussion. The obligation is indeed yours and other forum pro-evolutionist to defend your position by explanation of the absence of the transitional beings/species that I have questioned. Billy Joe Bob Gene stated just how many points does it take to determine a line? Fair point yet that's the way people came to the determination that the earth was flat and that the earth was the center of the universe. Regarding Evolution and the concept of it, taking only the proposed evolution from ape to man there should be an almost infinite number of transitional states but at the very least enough definable, visible, states to eliminate all doubt of the process. Evolution cannot produce any reliable, indisputable, states existing in any species to species transition that is alleged by the advocates of the theory. Neither can anyone taking that position on this forum as you have only your college or High School text books or recollection of a professor or teachers lectures from which you are so dogmatic about and place your faith upon. The burden is certainly upon those advocates of your position now that the statement has been put forth (by me, on here). It is yours to refute it, and defend your chosen position, rather than mine to justify your alleged position or argue against my own assertions. That's totally illogical but a great attempt at redirection of the discussion.
Last edited by gbrk
quote:
Originally posted by DustinSmith:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
For the life of me, I have tried to understand the message of your graphics -- but, it eludes me.

If you are saying that I liked girls when I was 9; you are right. And, when I was 10, 15, 25 -- 55, and although I have been happily married for almost 33 years -- I still enjoy the company of ladies -- Christian fellowship only.

Bill


Huh? What?

Stop playing dumb. Everyone in your life has known about you what YOU have ignored about yourself for your entire life. Go re-read your response to my cartoon (the one where you pretend to not know what it means). Trying to prove something, are we?

You're a homosexual, Bill.

Oh, on a side note -- it's not shown in my little cartoon, but the other little boys were playing baseball on the playground that day. You were skipping rope. Remember that day?

Dustin




Dustin,

You are surely taking a new low. You would surely rail against anyone that would pre-judge you or make allegations, against you, such that you have done.

Statements like yours, in this forum, surely question your own character and your qualifications to be a competent forum member.

It is to your shame to make such, unwarranted and unsubstantiated, allegations against another forum member, whether you like them or not, just because you were caught, and called, upon for your own lack of thinking before you chose a baseless cartoon and you can't think of any other rational, reasonable, response when you are called on it.



Oh and just to make sure you know what I mean by the use of the words "rail" and "Character" I'll post the definition below for you.

Rail - verb [ intrans. ] ( rail against/at/about) complain or protest strongly and persistently about : he railed at human fickleness.)

and

character |ˈkariktər| noun the mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual : running away was not in keeping with her character.


As a disclaimer, the above definitions taken from a dictionary and are not my own definitions.
quote:
Originally posted by gbrk:
Dustin,

You are surely taking a new low. You would surely rail against anyone that would pre-judge you or make allegations, against you, such that you have done.

Statements like yours, in this forum, surely question your own character and your qualifications to be a competent forum member.

It is to your shame to make such, unwarranted and unsubstantiated, allegations against another forum member, whether you like them or not, just because you were caught, and called, upon for your own lack of thinking before you chose a baseless cartoon and you can't think of any other rational, reasonable, response when you are called on it.


gbrk,

My statement that Bill is gay is not a childish insult. It is my belief and is based on the evidence he has presented in his past threads regarding homosexuality and a deep desire he has to show that "it is not a sin to have homosexual tendencies" -- but rather "it is a sin to act upon them". Clearly, these are ramblings by a homosexual who is trying to not be a homosexual.

In closing, your writing style puts me to sleep. You're a typical bore when it comes to the written word. While you're thinking you've just relayed deep thoughts and a great retort, I'm thinking to myself "Hmmm....I don't believe I've ever seen someone use 8 commas in a single sentence before."

Dustin
quote:
I have stated my disbelief in Evolution because of the glaring missing evidence of Evolution such as the lack of existence of transitional beings within each species.

gb, gb, gb,

How can I not have some fun with statements like the one above? It's stupidity squared, and deliberate stupidity, at that. Dishonest stupidity.

LOL, oh, I'm going to mock and ridicule and belittle and diminish and rag on that kind of idiocy every time I see it. It's just too much fun to avoid. You see, you don't have to be that stupid, but you choose to be. And you wonder why people laugh at Creationists. Only you Creationists don't know why.
quote:
Originally posted by Billy Joe Bob Gene:
quote:
I have stated my disbelief in Evolution because of the glaring missing evidence of Evolution such as the lack of existence of transitional beings within each species.

gb, gb, gb,

How can I not have some fun with statements like the one above? It's stupidity squared, and deliberate stupidity, at that. Dishonest stupidity.

LOL, oh, I'm going to mock and ridicule and belittle and diminish and rag on that kind of idiocy every time I see it. It's just too much fun to avoid. You see, you don't have to be that stupid, but you choose to be. And you wonder why people laugh at Creationists. Only you Creationists don't know why.


Seems with every additional post you reinforce my statements. The only retort you have is to cast dispersions upon fellow forum members about either their writing style, your perception of their education level or intelligence yet all the time never providing anything of substance, only the talking points of most evolution text books.

So can you, intelligently, answer the discrepancies I presented or will you still attempt to redirect the conversation by your slanders? You have to make up for your own inadequacies by deflecting attention on another and away from the topic at hand. You make dogmatic, bold, statements as if you have some superior knowledge or authority to make such statements and anyone who disagrees or doesn't believe, as you do, are idiots. It is one thing to have faith in something, and a basis for that faith, but when your ability to defend what you believe in is so, apparently, shallow you are like those that sailed into the ocean never to return so sure that the world was flat and so proud that your only defense is not of your own self but rather to threaten another by defamation of your fellow forum members through disparaging comments about their intelligence, grammar or education. Your faith is truly a shallow faith indeed which could explain your responses.

Oh, Is that the reason you were initially banned from the forum under your prior name, unprovoked, personal attacks on fellow forum members? If you are going to deal honestly with the forum members here why not just let them know what your former forum identity was? Oh that's right you were banned so you can't deal honestly with folks and use your original name lest Times Daily might expel you again.

Bear in mind ... from all appearances you, and some of your other friends (who possibly were also banned and assumed new names) come into a Forum (Religion) that none of you apparently here to constructively contribute to . You certainly aren't, by your post, acknowledging any deity, regardless the established religion or seeking answers. Your sole purpose, by posting here, like many of your kind, is to ridicule and abuse (by written word) your fellow forum members for you nor your other friends can seem to post little substantial relevant information to any topic. If another forum member, whether new member or just someone with interest in a religious topic, post a message or comment you, or those like you, are quick to jump in and post for the purpose to fight against any person that believes in a deity or has a question to ask of a fellow Christian member.

You, and your kind, rail against Christians who enter secular topic boards and post their (Christian) opinions about secular topics calling them "thumping" and telling them to go to their own forum all the while failing to take your own advice. Your presence here is not as a considerate forum member, though you might fool some. Many don't realize that some of you were banned by the Times Daily board for your actions against other forum members.

You believe in Evolution, then maybe your character should evolve for your sole reason being here appears not to be on of respectful motivations.

The idiocy you rant against is demonstrated by your own answers and by those same answers you reveal your true Character and reason for being on these forums. It's no wonder the Times Daily banned you before and you have to deceive your way back in by creating a new identity with the same ole destructive behavior.
quote:
Originally posted by DustinSmith:
quote:
Originally posted by gbrk:
Dustin,

You are surely taking a new low. You would surely rail against anyone that would pre-judge you or make allegations, against you, such that you have done.

Statements like yours, in this forum, surely question your own character and your qualifications to be a competent forum member.

It is to your shame to make such, unwarranted and unsubstantiated, allegations against another forum member, whether you like them or not, just because you were caught, and called, upon for your own lack of thinking before you chose a baseless cartoon and you can't think of any other rational, reasonable, response when you are called on it.


gbrk,

My statement that Bill is gay is not a childish insult. It is my belief and is based on the evidence he has presented in his past threads regarding homosexuality and a deep desire he has to show that "it is not a sin to have homosexual tendencies" -- but rather "it is a sin to act upon them". Clearly, these are ramblings by a homosexual who is trying to not be a homosexual.

In closing, your writing style puts me to sleep. You're a typical bore when it comes to the written word. While you're thinking you've just relayed deep thoughts and a great retort, I'm thinking to myself "Hmmm....I don't believe I've ever seen someone use 8 commas in a single sentence before."

Dustin


Simple solution to that Dustin .... put me on your Ignore list. Most know that you are ONLY here to be destructive rather than constructive. You like many care not for any rational dialog or debates but rather your only reason you are here is to "play with the simpletons, the Christians" that are so dumb. No you didn't say those words nor were they said by another but knowing your kind that is just how you think. You aren't here to contribute in any positive way. One only has to read your posts or replies to reveal your true nature/character.

also

I've read what Bill has posted, and stated, many times and what you said is warrant less and said only to be destructive toward a fellow forum member. This tells a lot about the person that you are rather than the person you are attempting to defame.

I repeat, you should be ashamed of your actions.
Hey, Billy Joe....Did gbrk just tell you that you can't be in the club? That this forum is strictly for the believers to pat each other on the back in? And then hang the threat of the principal's office over your head? Is BeeGee's apparent paranoid schizophrenia regarding ghosts of former forum members contagious?

Hmm... I did not know that this was the place to post church bulletins and excerpts from the bible only. How could anyone possibly objectively learn anything from that except what the posters wanted you to??

"Bleat!" *slap*, "attaboy!" "BAAAAAA-A-A!" *slap*, "Attaboy!"

I don't get it. What good is that? I mean, unless they actually NEED that positive feedback loop to keep convincing themselves that they actually DO believe? In which case-What good is the belief if it needs so much maintenance to continue?

/shrug..
Pup,

Lots of believers are quiet about it, don't go to church every time the doors are open, and consider it their private affair. They don't seem to need constant reinforcement. That's more than fair enough.

Others need quite a lot of reinforcement, and they're usually the one with the strangest literal beliefs, like a 6000 year old Universe. It must take lots of reinforcement to keep that sort of nonsense fresh. They're also the ones who consider public places harvest fields, as though the rest of us are ears of corn or wild ducks, not normally intelligent human beings with our own opinions. Even that's not enough to incur my humor.

It's the ones who make it a point to insult our intelligence with stories of Flood geology, the asinine fiction that is Creationism, the self-loathing concept of Original Sin and the dubious redemption therefrom, and the very notion that god speaks to them silently and for that privilege they claim the right to run our lives and minds. It's the ones who would see a mushroom cloud over New York City and rejoice that Jesus can't be far behind. Those people I'll gladly needle, I'll happily humiliate any time I can. Yeah, it's dangerous because they don't like the truth about them exposed, and there's nothing they won't do to maintain their fiction and the authority it conveys.

Some 80% of Americans claim to be vaguely Christian. About the same percentage of Alabamans claim to be Fundamentalist/evangelical Christians. I don't usually dislike those people, but I despise their religion. It's a corrosive, retarding effect on the public intelligence. It destroys science, critical thinking, and morality.

I'll show you what I mean. Take your typical Creatard, for instance. He cannot accept science that is demonstrable, grounded in tangible reality, and held with a certain skepticism by its very own adherents who know it could always be proven wrong. No definition of critical thinking allows one to begin with a fantastic conclusion, such as Creatardism, and then defend it with lies and illogic. The fact that Creatards so willingly and gleefully lie about their weird beliefs and science, even after they've been shown to be lying, is an example of fundamentalist morality. I don't just make this stuff up, it's out there for all to see.

So, I'll stick around here and simply remind people from time to time that we always choose to use or neglect our human intelligence. Honesty and other elements of morality are also choices we always make. It's not that we can make them, we do make them, and when our hypothetical Creatard lies to us about a literal 6 day Creation, he's chosen to be dishonest and, by extension, immoral.

When I see someone laying on BS to the disadvantage of the malleably-minded, I feel rather dirty if I don't pipe up. We endured the Dark Ages once, I'll resist its return.
What? No real answers to gbrk's questions? I think it was a resonable request.
Yet, Billy...you didn't really answer anything(?)
As I observe, its' pretty obvious the Atheists/Evolutionarists group here have no more to offer in a way of fact than the God/Creationist/Religious group does.
The GCR's quote scripture to each other/AE group, and have the "faith" "feel good" thing going on, and the AE's fall back on the everyone is stupid who don't follow us, let's pat each other on the back sh*t.
Gimme something better than that...
Dustin?...Aude...Pup?...Anybody????
quote:
Originally posted by CageTheElephant:
What? No real answers to gbrk's questions? I think it was a resonable request.
Yet, Billy...you didn't really answer anything(?)
As I observe, its' pretty obvious the Atheists/Evolutionarists group here have no more to offer in a way of fact than the God/Creationist/Religious group does.
The GCR's quote scripture to each other/AE group, and have the "faith" "feel good" thing going on, and the AE's fall back on the everyone is stupid who don't follow us, let's pat each other on the back sh*t.
Gimme something better than that...
Dustin?...Aude...Pup?...Anybody????


OK Cagey.. I'll take a crack at it. At least from where I'm standing.

I don't have a problem with the belief in god. I'm still trying to understand how people can do it.
I DO have a problem with some of the believers' reasoning.

I believe in evolution because to me, it makes sense. It follows a logical progression based on proven physical laws.

No, I can't explain in precise, mathematical detail how it works. I can't walk out in my backyard and grab a fossilized bone that belonged to a former member of a species that was somewhere in between the apes that Darwin says we came from and the species that is us today, but I *can* tell you about examples of the process of survival and adaptation for that purpose that Darwin describes that I see everywhere. I can't show ya a Dodo bird because there aren't any left. They're all dead. Extinct. Long time ago. Doesn't mean it didn't exist. Trilobites. They're dead too an even longer time ago. Can't show ya one, but I can tell ya where to go to see fossilized remains of one. Doesn't mean they didn't exist.

Dinosaurs. Don't EVEN get me started on THOSE buggers. There's enough bones in museums to prove that they existed. Atheists didn't just bresk out their Play-Doh Fun Factories and whomp up a buncha dinosaur bones just to prove the believers wrong.

I know I'm rambling here, but ya know what just occurred to me?

Ya don't see any god bones laying around anywhere.... If god supposedly created man in his own image, then WHY haven't WE ALWAYS BEEN HERE, TOO? WHY NOT then are we all-powerful, all-seeing entities like he supposedly is?

I mean, c'mon! If you're gonna believe the story-believe the WHOLE story-The parts they didn't tell ya about that would make sense to anyone capable of rational thought. If god created us in his own image, that logically means that god works just like we do, following the same irrefutable laws of physics-There's gotta be some former god bones laying around SOME-freakin'-where in the universe, 'cause NOTHING can live that long!

How do we know nothing can live that long?
Because WE don't live that long.! Logically, if we were created in his image-He must then follow the same physical rules that we have to-either that or we should be just like him and be immortal, all-powerful beings just like him.

If he created us in his own image-WHY did he leave us here on this rock to fend for ourselves? (Oh, yeah, that talking snake/garden of Eden thing..)

You might say to me "But we're supposed to eventually go to be with him in heaven!"

Horsecrap. That makes no sense. If he wanted us there with him, he woulda created us there with him. Why the need for a trial period that just keeps repeating itself? If we are created in his own image-why do we NEED a trial period?
Did god make a mistake in the program causing us to screw up and get banished from the garden? Was he UNSURE of his own abilities? Aren';t we supposed to be like him? If he were perfect and considered us to be his perfect creation-the apex of his career, What went wrong? If we were perfect, like him, that whole garden thing WOULD NOT HAVE McFREAKING HAPPENED!
He/We are either perfect or He/We're not.

"Magic" cannot and does not make sense.

Either HE created us in "his own image" (read: "Mirror image"), Why then are we not just like him?) Or WE created HIM in our own image. (Why then isn't he just like us?)

Ya can't have it both ways.

If you're gonna make the rules, EVERYBODY has to follow the same flappin' rules.

As far as evolution goes, I see that it's all about survival.

The salamander that just outright drops it's tail off when it is touched to avoid being caught and killed-and then regenerates a new one so it can do it agqain should the need arise. Neat trick. Very effective survival tactic.

The bacteria that mutates to adapt to different conditions to avoid being killed either by external threats or to keep from killing it's own host. Ebola, for instance, still hasn't quite figured that one out. It still has to transfer to another host before it kills the one it's in to stay alive.

The common cold virus. There's an example of a living thing that *has* adapted to the point where it doesn't kill it's host (living environment). Even it still doesn't have the ability yet to adapt to conditions that are outside the limits of those it needs to survive and is therefore killed when the conditions of it's environment become hostile to it. (too hot, too cold, too acid, too alkaline, etc.)
I suspect that the reason it still exists is because we haven't yet found the place that IS always conducive to it's survival. Then again, maybe it just knows when to 'jump ship' and move on to a less hostile environment and that's how it survives. I'm not a doctor and I haven't been taught all the details of how viruses work, but I've been told by people who ARE doctors and DO know how it works that this is what they do. I've proven to myself that I can shorten the time a virus negatively affects me by purposely changing my blood chemistry (too acid/too alkaline) slightly for awhile.
(Bugs HATE aspirin, (acetylsalicylic acid) it seems. If your stomach lining can tolerate it, I recommend it when you're sick.)

Viruses follow the same physical laws that we all must follow. While I haven't been taught all the details, I understand the concepts and they make sense.

Do I believe the doctor based solely on blind faith? No. I don't have to rely on blind faith because I'm not blind to understanding the process and the reasons for it.

How can I just believe something that somebody who claims to be an authority on it TOLD ME?

Because it makes sense to me. Why?

Because I know from my own personal experience that if I walk into a blast furnace that is operating (too hot), I am going to die. The materials that make up my body will be converted into byproducts of what they used to be (conversion of matter to energy-observed and proven) and then they will no longer function as they once did. (Matter cannot be destroyed-only changed in form-It has been observed and proven) I'll still be here, I just won't be anything like I remember being like.
I won't do that then because I don't want to die.

I know that if I spend too much time out in the New England (or NOO YAWK) winter weather and I'm not dressed properly for it, I'm going to die because being in an environment where the temperature is too low,(Cold slows molecular activity-this has been observed and proven) the fluids I need to stay circulating in my body will thicken and slow, like motor oil in an old Volvo in Bangor in January and it will no longer be able to carry nutrients and oxygen to the parts of me that need them to stay alive.
I won't do that then because I don't want to die.

I know not to drink the sulfuric acid out of the battery in my bike. I've seen what it does to my blue jeans when I accidentally splash the slightest drop on them. Eats 'em right up. I've also felt the pain of acid burns when I wasn't careful pouring it and it got on my skin. I've seen the destroyed skin where I got burned and waited for it to slough off, dead.
So I won't do that then because I don't want to be damaged and I don't want to die.

Besides...The acid doesn't taste good. Don't even ask me how I know this, cause I'm too embarrassed to explain it.

I know enough not to drink Drano. (POP, POP, FIZZ, FIZZ) because I've seen the violent destruction it causes to organic materials it comes in contact with as it breaks them down into simpler versions of what they were. (again, conversion of matter to energy-observed and proven. Don't believe me? Pour some Drano (sodium hydroxide) down the drain next time you have a hairball stuck in there and feel the pipe. It'll be mighty hot (matter-to-energy)).
So I won't do that then because I don't want to die.

I won't jump out onto the interstate in front of traffic because I know that Force=Mass x Velocity. (Logical-Proven) It'll hurt, but only for a second or three (as the car's kinetic energy is transferred to me-who isn't built to withstand it) before either the organs I need functioning to support the brain I live in stop working because they've been crushed out of shape/position and they don't do what they're supposed to do anymore and/or the aforementioned fluids leak out of me instead of going where they're supposed to. I've seen with my own eyes the result of this energy transfer-and it ain't pretty.
Again, I don't want to die.


Now, exactly *why* I don't wanna die does remain a mystery to me.

Things like that often make me wonder "what's the point? Why the heck DO I have such a strong instinct to survive? That point, I guess is where my logic runs out.

Bill, You're telling me "SHOW me where MY belief proves what you're telling me!" (Whaddya$#@*in'kiddinme??) I can't show you proof of what I'm saying in your scripture because it isn't IN your scripture.

You're setting me/us up to be wrong by dictating that it only be by YOUR ()Your book's/belief's, whatever) rules and definitions that we can show you proof of what we are talking about because you KNOW it isn't in there. That's a pretty pathetic attempt at a guaranteed win, in my opinion.

It makes you appear to be a 'moron-on-purpose.'
Last edited by Road Puppy
We fear some have taken offense at my questioning of Darwin's readership and obviously foul-tempered belittlement of Ben Stein as an expert on the "conspiracy."

Your "beliefs" are as silly to me as using goat entrails to determine when the tribe is to move to winter pasture.

The inability of certain religious sects to understand the age and depth of certain central myths attached to their sect never ceases to amaze me. The noted seem to be able to memorize entire passages of scripture but utterly unable to detect the meaning over the action written.
quote:
Originally posted by Aude Sapere:
We fear some have taken offense at my questioning of Darwin's readership and obviously foul-tempered belittlement of Ben Stein as an expert on the "conspiracy."

Your "beliefs" are as silly to me as using goat entrails to determine when the tribe is to move to winter pasture.

The inability of certain religious sects to understand the age and depth of certain central myths attached to their sect never ceases to amaze me. The noted seem to be able to memorize entire passages of scripture but utterly unable to detect the meaning over the action written.



"You twockin' to me?"
Pup,

Let me help you out a bit on the matter/energy thing. Yes, Einstein tells us they are algebraic expressions of each other (E = mc^2).

Matter and energy are, indeed interchangeable, but not as easily as making Drano work, or burning a piece of wood. The heat that is generated in such an action is simply excess energy of changing atomic electrical bonds. No matter is lost when you burn that 2 X 4, it's just rearranged, with surplus energy making heat. If you weighed the lumber and all the oxygen it takes to combust it, and were somehow able to also weigh the ashes and resultant gases of the fire, you'd find they're the same.

It took energy to make the wood--photosynthesis. That energy took basic elements and compounds and arranged them into more complex chemicals. When you burn the wood, the chemicals are reduced to simpler compounds and elements, releasing the energy it took to make the wood. Hence, heat.

Matter and energy are exchanged in the types of nuclear reactions that make radiation, such as a nuclear power plant (fission) or in the Sun (fusion). These are both examples of matter turning into energy. All matter was made from energy shortly after the Big Bang, and it's rarely made anymore. All of that matter was hydrogen and helium, and from those simple elements, the heavier elements were formed in stars later.

Nuclear power plants also generate heat, but not, of course, by combustion. If you were to weigh the uranium that causes the heat before and after its life in the reactor, you'd find it weighs just a bit less afterward. The difference in mass became energy.

If you're interested, our friends at the Cassiopeia Project have several videos available that explain the current knowledge on the subject. OK, several subjects. Here's one from the most excellent BestofScience page at YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...L&videos=GeIMiGA6boY


The above is my best understanding from a lifetime of interest in the subject, although I'm no physicist. If anyone needs to correct my science, with better science, feel free.
quote:
Originally posted by Road Puppy:
Did god make a mistake in the program causing us to screw up and get banished from the garden? Was he UNSURE of his own abilities?


this is the only part i'm going to address, Puppy.
the rest i don't have even a hypothetical answer.
for this one i have a ' well.. Maybe'.. kinda of answer.
this is also one that'll irritate the Fundies - even average christians have problems with this idea, for reasons that will be obvious.
and, as always, i don't say this is truth. this time i'm not even saying that *I* believe it, i just think it's possible, and soemthign interesting to think about.

In the begining there was yadda yadda yadda, fast forward, and there's a garden and all that other stuff.
In the garden there are 2 trees, the tree of eternal life, and the tree of the knowledge of good an evil.
and God said, "ok, here ya go. make like bunnies, and have fun, but see that tree? that's MY tree. lay off it. you can have all the fruits from the apple tree of eternal life, that you might enjoy apples and all apple based products for eternity. but if you eat from my peach tree of the knowledge of good and evil, i will jack you up."

time passes. Eve gets sick of apples. Eve has a peach, and it is good. Eve talks Adam into eating a peach, because eve has boobs, and they are good.
so God tosses them out of the garden, BECAUSE that's where the tree of eternal life is, and God doesn't want them to have access to BOTH eternal life, and the knowledge of good and evil.

because, i think, the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil was the proof.. the final test, that God's Project People was successful - the action of them denying HIs rule and eating that peach proved that they had free will and could make up their own minds.
i think it's possible that Adam and Eve were the First Man and Woman, because until they demonstrated that they had free will, they were just mindless constructs, not humans.
i thnk it's possible that Adam and Eve were not the first attempts to make humans, they were just the first attempt that worked.

i think it's possible that God WANTED them to eat the peach, and that they passed the test by failing to obey Him. (i don't think the peach GAVE them free will, it just proved that they had one.) maybe being thrown out of the garden wasn't a punishement, but more like a graduation?

this would also explain why people in the first part of the bible lived for hundreds of years - A and E had eaten lots of the Perma-Apples, and passed the life sustaining apple juice down to their children, and it took many generations to filter the extra years out down to a more managable level.

/shrug.
I dunno.. it's just an idea, but it does kinda make sense for an answer to why he cleaned out the garden.
BJG:

It is called the "mass defect." The two plus elements formed from fission are called "fission products" and there is a chart out there, the famous "Mae West" or "Dolly Parton" chart which shows which are most likely to be the daughters. The amount of mass defect is directly related to the amount of energy released. Plutonium fissions differently than Uranium, for example, and has its own charts as does Thorium and other fissiles.
quote:
Originally posted by Aude Sapere:
BJG:

It is called the "mass defect." The two plus elements formed from fission are called "fission products" and there is a chart out there, the famous "Mae West" or "Dolly Parton" chart which shows which are most likely to be the daughters. The amount of mass defect is directly related to the amount of energy released. Plutonium fissions differently than Uranium, for example, and has its own charts as does Thorium and other fissiles.


Thanks, Aude, that makes perfect sense.
quote:
Matter and energy are exchanged in the types of nuclear reactions that make radiation, such as a nuclear power plant (fission) or in the Sun (fusion). These are both examples of matter turning into energy. All matter was made from energy shortly after the Big Bang, and it's rarely made anymore. All of that matter was hydrogen and helium, and from those simple elements, the heavier elements were formed in stars later.




So which existed first? You state the "Big Bang" which is basically something from nothing so therefore your prime element, if one existed, is then your God and if there is no intelligent force then what causes the initial bang with such tremendous force that it could not be comprehended or measured? Something (so infinitely powerful just happens from nothing right? If not then what was the initial element, the primary force, where did it come from?
quote:
Originally posted by Billy Joe Bob Gene:
I'm so glad you asked, gb.

Lawrence Krauss is likely a near-future Nobel Physics Award winner.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo

Hope you enjoy.


A good presentation of the current position on cosmology by many physicists.

I doubt if his repeating what is accepted as the latest model will get him a Nobel Prize.

If he places himself outside the universe as an observer as he suggested ;I will be the first to recommend a major award.

God is already out there and requires no company the likes of Krauss or dawkins the drunk.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×