Skip to main content

When I see the leaders like dawkins agreeing with and giving support to atheist like singer what am I to think?

I don’t know if anyone will watch this interview between singer and dawkins; after watching this interview where dawkins agrees that wholesale killing of infants up to a certain age after birth and the killing of adults who are sick or the handicapped, eating the flesh of humans who are considered road kill, sex with animals producing off spring, there will be those candidates on here that will agree with dawkins and singer and a couple of believers that will think that it is just fine for the atheist candidates to beat believers over the head with this sickness.

Listen very carefully where dawkins states it would be immoral for us not to produce offspring between humans and other animals.

Singer states that sex between humans and animals is ok if it gives mutual pleasure between the participants.

Watch the interview.
INTERVIEW WITH SINGER

And read about peter singer here:Wikipedia
Quote:Commenting on Singer's article "Heavy Petting,"[29] in which he argues that zoosexual activity need not be abusive, and that relationships could form which were mutually enjoyed.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by buffalo:
When I see the leaders like dawkins agreeing with and giving support to atheist like singer what am I to think?

I don’t know if anyone will watch this interview between singer and dawkins; after watching this interview where dawkins agrees that wholesale killing of infants up to a certain age after birth and the killing of adults who are sick or the handicapped, eating the flesh of humans who are considered road kill, sex with animals producing off spring, there will be those candidates on here that will agree with dawkins and singer and a couple of believers that will think that it is just fine for the atheist candidates to beat believers over the head with this sickness.

Listen very carefully where dawkins states it would be immoral for us not to produce offspring between humans and other animals.

Singer states that sex between humans and animals is ok if it gives mutual pleasure between the participants.

Watch the interview.
INTERVIEW WITH SINGER

And read about peter singer here:Wikipedia
Quote:Commenting on Singer's article "Heavy Petting,"[29] in which he argues that zoosexual activity need not be abusive, and that relationships could form which were mutually enjoyed.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Everything's okay buff, this is the zoosexual forum, ain't it??

.
quote:
Originally posted by INVICTUS:
quote:
Originally posted by ryokurin:
Assuming that every Atheist believes in eugenics is similar to assuming at every person who say they are a Christian will get into heaven.

bill gray said they weren't christian in the first place.

Hi Vic,

It all depends upon whether a person is a "professing" Christian or a "confessing" Christian.

If you do not know the difference, let me know. I will be happy to explain.

But, let me close by assuring everyone that a "confessing" Christian will KNOW that he/she HAS eternal life in Christ.

Others depend upon "by guess and by golly" attempts to enter heaven.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_Piggy_Bear_TEXT-1a
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
quote:
Originally posted by INVICTUS:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ryokurin:
Assuming that every Atheist believes in eugenics is similar to assuming at every person who say they are a Christian will get into heaven.

bill gray said they weren't christian in the first place.

Hi Vic,

It all depends upon whether a person is a "professing" Christian or a "confessing" Christian.
If you do not know the difference, let me know. I will be happy to explain.
but, let me close by assuring everyone that a "confessing" Christian will KNOW that he/she HAS eternal life in Christ.
Others depend upon "by guess and by golly" attempts to enter heaven.
QUOTE]
xxxxxxxxxxxxx

I know very well the difference between "confessing and professing".

I have no need of any explanation about anything from you.

It was more of a joke, because you have made that statement a few times in the past.


.
Buf.....Where the HELL do you find this sh*t?

I follow no leaders. Not since leaving the Army, anyway.

I don't care what Dawkins and Singer or Hitchens or Blair or any other fat, bald weirdo you can quote thinks about anything.

Dunno who they are and don't care.

I know what I can see, hear, and touch. I know what makes sense. Everything else is hearsay and more than likely fantasy.

Roll up Blawkins and Hinger and Sitchens and staple Peter and whoever that other deviant zoo-sex nutjob-in-the-name-of-god on the forum is to the whole great whacking fustercluck that results from it and pound it all the way up yer 6K package with thy rod and thy staff for all I care.

Most of the 'rest of society' are sheeple anyway.

Show me one worth impressing and I'll show ya how I wanna be seen. Meantime-WYSIWYG.
first - that's puppy. that was awsome.

second.. i don't care what a candidate believes as long as he keeps his beliefs out of his actions after he is elected.

i'd vote for an athiest, a buddhist, a christian, a hindu, a jew or a muslim or god help us a scientologist, as long as they wanted the same thng for the future of our country as i do and they kept their faith, or lack thereof, out of washington.

what they do and how they vote should be based on what america needs, not what god wants.

give god what is due god, but give ceaser what is due ceaser. their elected job is to render unto ceaser, not deliver unto god.


like the baptist preacher said.. " i just throw all the cash into the air and whatever god catches is what he keeps, and i keep the rest."
quote:
Originally posted by Road Puppy:
Buf.....Where the HELL do you find this sh*t?

I follow no leaders. Not since leaving the Army, anyway.

I don't care what Dawkins and Singer or Hitchens or Blair or any other fat, bald weirdo you can quote thinks about anything.

Dunno who they are and don't care.

I know what I can see, hear, and touch. I know what makes sense. Everything else is hearsay and more than likely fantasy.

Roll up Blawkins and Hinger and Sitchens and staple Peter and whoever that other deviant zoo-sex nutjob-in-the-name-of-god on the forum is to the whole great whacking fustercluck that results from it and pound it all the way up yer 6K package with thy rod and thy staff for all I care.

Most of the 'rest of society' are sheeple anyway.

Show me one worth impressing and I'll show ya how I wanna be seen. Meantime-WYSIWYG.


Dang pup that was epic.

Somewhere in that post you must have hit some nail in the head.
quote:
Originally posted by CageTheElephant:
OK Buff...I'm sorry...I can't stand it any longer!
What is an atheist "candidate"?
Is it, say, like the Masons...where someone has to nominate you...to get in?

EekerCage they are confussed [not to be confused with Confusedconfused] folk who don’t know what to believe. They are just candidates for atheism. You can find them easy at night with a spotlight. Like in ‘deer in the headlight’ look]
Eeker Bad shape.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×