Skip to main content

Is Cass  Sunstein a Conservative or Liberal?  Democrat or Republican?  Okay you could answer quickly realizing that he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Obama administration from 2009 to 2012 but I think more telling is a statement that he made that is so typical of today's Democrat and/or Liberal and here is that statement:  The whole paragraph below links to his statement.

Cass Sunstein said that the South African Constitution is "the most admirable constitution in the history of the world." It contains a lengthy list of socio-economic rights, which the drafters hoped would protect and assist those disadvantaged by Apartheid and those who are poor and vulnerable. The relatively new South African Constitutional Court has required the government to implement these rights. Conversely, the United States Supreme Court has been unwilling to find socio-economic rights in the United States Constitution, in part because of separation of powers concerns.

How about Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court Justice appointed by Bill Clinton?  She should be apolitical as with respect to her occupation/job but so often judges are.  Some conservatives have indicated that Ruth Bader Ginsberg made a similar statement to Cast Sunstein but that is not the case.  She did indicate that for today with respect to other nations that the South African Constitution would be superior to the United States Constitution.  I won't attempt to get into her mind, as I couldn't, but many liberals and contemporary Democrats do revile our Constitution and the White men who formed it.  They do so because they claim that no women were present and had a part in it and no minorities.  

If you are going to take an oath to defend and respect the Constitution and your job requires it then it should be an honest oath and you should believe in what you are defending.  Ruth Ginsberg may believe in it and honor it but from her comments I think there is room for questioning how she feels about it.  

The point of my topic is that a great many liberals and Democrats (some are one in the same) do not believe our Constitution is a good thing and believe it is a racist document created by racist white people.  I could be wrong but I don't believe I have ever heard a Conservative or Republican make a statement anywhere near to that.  Some Republicans have misquote Ruth Bader Ginsburg about how she feels, for their own political benefit, and that isn't right but with respect to how people feel about the Constitution our nation was founded on and governs our Nation there are vast differences in the way people look at it.

Be as the Bereans ( Acts 17:11 )

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

direstraits posted:

South Africa is seizing farmland without recompense. Then, distributing the land to those without experience above subsistence farming.  Their neighbor, Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia) made the similar actions.  Zimbabwe progressed from the bread basket of southern Africa to starvation.  

Exactly, and there are a great many in America that do not respect freedom or have a polluted sense of it that would be just as wiling for the same to happen here.  Many liberals would have no problem replacing our Constitution with a new one that would support their agenda.  There are a large number of liberals who even have forgotten history or have never knew history from the beginning and have in their mind that the founding of this nation was done so on the backs of slaves and that those who participated in its founding were slave masters and thus we need a more inclusive Constitution that takes into account everyone equally and is "fair" to all.  They fail to look at our constitution as an alive document that has built in procedures by which to alter and change it and those changes were made difficult but not impossible and for a very good reason.  

Most, if not all, civilizations and great Nations or dynasties have fell and crumbled from the inside and given our current age it's not unlikely that outside interest would have inside assistance in accomplishing their agenda and desires.  With this great Nation and in our time though more power has been granted to the people and although we have a system where the people have power we are close to forgetting why we have that and failing to appreciate what we do have.  Or at least that is how it seems to me at times.

The American Revolutionary War of Independence was just that, a war.
The US Constitution is one very much admired by a list of world leaders
past and present. Attempting to compare the eighteenth century to the 
 twenty first in any way one would want to look at the difference three
hundred years will make and not objectively consider those differences
has no business criticizing the work the conservatives have built over the
years in spite of the home grown enemies.

The genius of America is the constitution, coupled with the American character.  The constitution's checks and balances keep any branch from accumulating too much power, internally.  The compromises such as the Senate, House and electoral college keep a few states from over ruling the rest and urban, suburban and rural from accumulating too much power.

The American character increased, over time, those who participate in the freedoms promised by the constitution.  White men, with property, were the first to vote and serve. Then, in concentric circles, the number grew larger.  Most state required men own about $50 in property (a large sum at the time) before they could vote. In time, most men considered property, not just land and building, but their tools and stock.  Thus, middle class men begin to vote and serve. Slaves were freed after a disastrous war.  Then, made citizens and granted the vote (men anyway).  Women's suffrage became a reality.  More people granted more freedom and rights under the same system. 

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×