Skip to main content

Hi to all my Forum Friends,

Recently, I was studying a Scripture passage in John 15 -- and realized how blessed I am to be an active posting member on the TimesDaily Religion Forum.  In January 2007 I came on the Religion Forum to refute several rather dominant atheists who seemed to control that forum.  And, since then I have been blessed to be able to share God's Word on the Religion Forum for the benefit of those who want to read and know about the Gospel of Jesus Christ.   The John 15 Scripture passage which caught my attention -- and which seems so applicable is:

 

John 15:18-23, "If the world hates you, you know that it has hated Me before it hated you.  (19) If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you.  (20) Remember the word that I said to you, 'A slave is not greater than his master.'  If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you; if they kept My word, they will keep yours also.  (21) But all these things they will do to you for My name's sake, because they do not know the One who sent Me.  (22) If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin, but now they have no excuse for their sin.  (23) He who hates Me hates My Father also."

 

Let's break this passage down, verse by verse, to reflect the believer's life in today's secular society, and more specifically on the TimesDaily Religion Forum:  

 

John 15:18, "If the world hates you, you know that it has hated Me before it hated you."  

 

First, let me clarify that when this Scripture passage tells us that the "world" will hate Christians -- it is not speaking of all the people of the world.  Instead, it is speaking of the secular world, i.e., those people who deny God and Jesus Christ, and who cling to secular society's values.  Because they deny God and His values and cling to secular society's values -- they will hate Christians for holding up a spiritual mirror for them to see themselves as God sees them.

One thing I can count on when I post on the Religion Forum - as sure as evening follows morning - is that a small group of "Kill Bill" forum members will immediately go into the "attack" mode.  Whether I post a new discussion or post a comment on an existing discussion, there is a known, fixed small group of Forum Friends who will ALWAYS respond with negative, denigrating, and very often derogatory comments in response to my post.  

Like water seeking its own level, when the two dominant atheists whose writings on the Religion Forum drew me here in 2007, Deep and Fish, and their handful of devout followers eventually faded into the sunset -- the prince of this world, Satan, already had his second string team ready to go.  

Let's take a look at the make-up of this second string team which, today, is always ready to pounce whenever I, or any true Christian believer, tries to share the Word of God on the Religion Forum.  Let's take them in the order of their determined devotion to rid the Religion Forum of Bill Gray and all that silly Christian stuff he is always sharing:

 

1. Most active is an Agnostic lady who hates God because she feels that He let her down.  Consequently, because I tend to be the most active Christian posting on this Forum, she will always attack me with demonic fervor.  And, she will dishonestly plagiarize and chop up my writings in an attempt to make them appear to say what she wants - and not what I have written.   She is so full of bitterness toward God that she will use any level of attack she can dream up -- including personal attacks against me and my family -- in her attempt to blacken God's Word and me for sharing it.

2. Next in line when demonic fervor was passed out is a Roman Catholic wanna-be.  Not sure if he even attends mass.  Most likely he is one of those "I was born Roman Catholic and I will die Roman Catholic -- don't confuse me with Biblical facts" type of people.  And, his attacks tend to be "sewer/gutter level language" which should really embarrass all true Roman Catholics.

3. There are several devout Atheists who come on rather regularly preaching their atheist gospel.  One lady Atheist will often share any article she can find in the secular news which she feels proves, in her mind, that God, the Bible, the Christian faith, and all who share them, are totally wacko.  Funny, if she truly does not believe that God exists -- why is she so determined and why does she work so hard to prove her case against Him?   Since I know that pink elephants do not fly around my neighborhood, I do not post about pink elephants.  But, she is always posting something to prove that the God who does not exist (in her mind) has done, or is doing, something bad.  C'est la vie!

4. There are two Liberal Legalistic Theology followers who tell us they are Christian.  One of them I think actually believes the secular-based "let's keep God out of all public venues and all public life" whale he has swallowed.  And his justification for that is his adamant devotion to his Liberal Legalistic Theology.   The other is just a fellow who appears to be in that senile part of life, who will follow anyone who dangles a worldly carrot in front of him, and who is devoted to his Liberal Legalistic way of life -- even if it means having atheists, agnostics, and all sort of non-believers as his chosen friends and partners in attacking conservative Christian theology.

5. Then, there is a small handful of what I can only label as "vanilla-flavored non-believers."  One tells us he is a Christian believer -- but refuses to set foot in any church, does not believe the Bible is the Word of God, and is determined to destroy anyone who has the audacity to come on the Religion Forum and share the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  He has several strange friends, one who rides in on his motorcycle wearing shoulder length hair, trying his best to look and act like a 1960s hippie even though he was not born then, all while declaring himself to be an atheist -- even though he cannot even spell it.

6. Not to be outdone, there are a few who will jump into any discussion just to see if they can turn it into a elementary level school yard brawl and spitting contest.

7.  And, along with all those smiling (I said "smiling" - not smelly) folks, there is a small group of followers who will jump on any bandwagon as soon as any of the above named "leaders with demonic fervor" starts the music playing.  But, all told, this whole group, from 1 through 7, I can count on my ten fingers.  So, when writing I merely stand that small Malcontent Cabal up against the thousands of intelligent folks who come on the TimesDaily Forums only to read.  And, the latter group is my target audience when I write.

 

Over the past few weeks, one advantage of the "dark cloud with a silver lining" of having to refurbish my old computer to be able do my writings -- is that between work sessions I can often reflect upon what I have written or should be writing.  One evening, while laying in bed in a time of reflection, I could envision an image in my mind's eye. 

I saw me standing on a low platform while a small pack of angry dogs were fiercely barking, yapping, snarling, jumping around and making all sort of noise.  I noticed that the pack was mixed.  There were a couple of Pit Bulls, several excited Pointers, one or two old worn-out looking German Shepherds, a couple of Pugs, and several nervous Chihuahuas and Poodles.  But, upon closer inspection, even with all their fierce growling, snapping, and barking -- I noticed something amazing.  They were all toothless!

Looking beyond this small pack of toothless, angry wild dogs -- I could see a large multitude of friendly, smiling folks who seem to be patiently waiting.  And, the acceptance I could see in their smiling faces seemed to drown out the yapping and barking of the pack near the platform on which I was standing.   

Kind of makes me wonder if this mental image I saw was not God continuing to encourage me and blessing my writing ministry, telling me not to be concerned with the noise from the toothless pack; just concentrate on the more receptive folks standing quietly behind them.  Something I will have to think about. 

And, maybe this time for inner reflection caused by having my ministry computer die - and having to spend the time refurbishing an older, slower computer to use for my writing ministry - is part of His plan to grow and bless this ministry He has given me.  Definitely worth meditating and praying over.

Reflecting on this, I can see why Jesus tells all Christian believers, "If the world hates you, you know that it has hated Me before it hated you."

Of course, there will always be those few "couch potato" Christians who declare, "If anyone wants to hear about Jesus, they will ask me.  If they do not ask, I will not push my beliefs on them.  I don't want to be considered a Bible thumper!"   In general, we call those liberal Christians, although not all liberal Christians fall into that trap.  Many, like we conservatives, take the Great Commission to heart.

Next, we read:

 

John 15:19, "If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you."

 

How true!  The world, the secular world, loves its own!   And, that is why when a Christian posts God's Word on the Religion Forum, circle the wagons -- for the secularist attackers will certainly be surrounding the camp, looking to behead anyone with the audacity to actually share God's Word on the Religion Forum.

Then, we read: 

 

John 15:20 "Remember the word that I said to you, 'A slave is not greater than his master.' If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you; if they kept My Word, they will keep yours also."  

 

There is an old saying, "There is none so blind, as he who will not see!"   No, that is not a Bill Gray saying, but one that can be traced back to knowledgeable scholars from hundreds of years ago, and even to the Old Testament:

 

In his commentary on Psalm 82, Matthew Henry wrote: “A gift in secret blinds their eyes.  They know not because they will not understand. None so blind as those that will not see.  They have baffled their own consciences, and so they walk on in darkness.”   (http://odb.org/2009/05/27/none-so-blind/)

According to the ‘Random House Dictionary of Popular Proverbs and Sayings’ -- this proverb has been traced back to 1546 (John Heywood), and resembles the Biblical verse Jeremiah 5:21 ("Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not").  In 1738 it was used by Jonathan Swift in his "Polite Conversation" and is first attested in the United States in the 1713 "Works of Thomas Chalkley."  The full saying is: "There are none so blind as those who will not see.  The most deluded people are those who choose to ignore what they already know."   (http://www.actualfreedom.com.a...rium/nonesoblind.htm)

 

Can we doubt what these leading scholars of the past tell us, and what Jesus tells us in John 15:20 -- that when folks will ignore His Word, are they not deluding themselves?

Jesus tells us:

 

John 15:21, "But all these things they will do to you for My name's sake, because they do not know the One who sent Me."

 

And, that is the crux of the problem.   Not that they truly do not believe that God exists, it is just that they do not want Him to exist -- for then, even though they are not believers, they are still accountable to Him.   So, they cover their spiritual eyes, put on their spiritual blinders, and declare, "God does not exist!"   Even their de facto  leader, Richard Dawkins, has recently admitted that he is not really sure that God does not exist.

Jesus continues:

 

John 15:22, "If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin, but now they have no excuse for their sin."  

 

Again, we come to the heart of the problem.   Jesus did come, Jesus has spoken to us, and none of us have an excuse for not believing and for our sins.  We ARE accountable.   Yet, there are many folks who have convinced themselves that if they will adamantly deny that God exists, or even use the excuse that they are not really sure that He exits -- then, they are not accountable to Him.

Nothing could be further from the truth.   Non-believers tell us, "I am not a believer, not even sure I believe there is a God -- so, your Bible is nothing to me.  You have to follow it, but, I do not, for I am not a Christian believer."   Not true, my Friend.

 

2 Corinthians 5:10, "For we must ALL appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may be recompensed for his deeds in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad." 

 

That "ALL" means -- well, it means ALL!   And, that ALL includes all believers, all non-believers, and even all those who will adamantly declare, "God does not exist!"   ALL is ALL!  And, that ALL includes YOU, regardless of your beliefs or disbelief!

At this point, I believe the following article excerpt fits well.  In Luke 12:48, Jesus tells all believers, ". . .  For everyone to whom much is given, from him much will be required; and to whom much has been committed, of him they will ask the more."    

We, as believers, are held accountable to a higher standard, for we are supposed to be emulating, to the best of our humanly-limited ability, Jesus Christ.

 

How to Handle Hate (John 15:18-16:4)
https://bible.org/seriespage/h...e-hate-john-1518-164

A third reason why the world rejects Christians is they are ignorant of God.  In (John)15:21 Jesus says, “But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know the One who sent Me.”  The world will persecute Christians because they don’t know God.  There is a huge difference between knowing about God - and knowing God.

Our persecutors don’t know the one true God.  They persecute us because of their hatred of Christ.  Jesus is saying, “Don’t take it personally -- persecution is not your fault!  Persecution is ultimately directed against Me."  Instead of becoming angry with unbelievers, we need to pray that we would have compassion for them. 

Do you realize that many unbelievers have never read the Bible?  Many unbelievers don’t even own a Bible.  Do you understand that many people only know the name of Jesus Christ as a curse word?

Did you know that your neighbor, classmate, and coworker may never have heard a clear presentation of the Gospel?  The reason that they don’t know God is because they are ignorant (not intellectually ignorant, but ignorant of God's Word). 

Although the world may choose to reject Christ, we are accountable to share Christ with them.  Sadly, many Christians tend to verbally chastise unbelievers for Godless living -- and then look the other way when believers are guilty of Godless living.  This is completely backwards. 


Unbelievers are not held to the same standard that Christians are.  Unbelievers are supposed to sin; it’s a part of their job description!  If I was an unbeliever, I would be sinning to my absolute heart’s content.  I would be a world-class sinner.  I would live for myself.

** Bill Gray note:  Boy, can I relate to that!  It is as though this writer was describing me.  But, praise God, that is far behind me.**

But I would certainly hope that someone would love me enough to share the Good News of Christ with me.  While I would most likely rebel against the message, it would be helpful to know that someone cared enough to share it with me.


May we seek to be more tolerant of unbelievers and ratchet our expectations for professing believers.  The world doesn’t want the church to judge them; the world wants the church to judge their own.  Gandhi once observed, “I might be persuaded to become a Christian … if I ever met one.”  Gandhi was impressed with Jesus’ teaching in the Sermon on the Mount, and he wanted to see evidence of a Christian living out Jesus’ teachings.  May our lives showcase Christ.

 

I am once again reminded of a true statement which all Christian believers should take to heart, "Your life may be the only Bible some people will ever see.  Make sure it reads well."

Finally, Jesus tells us:

 

John 15:23, "He who hates Me hates My Father also."

 

And, whoever hates God -- WILL hate anyone who tries to share God's Word with him/her.   Yet we believers must NOT allow that to stop us from taking the Gospel of Jesus Christ to a needy world.  The following Scripture passages are, or should be, familiar to ALL Christian believers:

 

Matthew 28:19-20, "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age."  

Acts 1:8, "But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be My witnesses both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and even to the remotest part of the earth."  

Mark 16:15, "And He said to them, 'Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation.' "

 

This, of course, is the Great Commission given to all believers by Jesus Christ.  He instituted it with His apostles, but leaves no doubt that it applies to all believers.  To all who have been given much, more is expected of us (Luke 12:48).

I like to summarize the Great Commission as:   "GO, Make disciples, Baptize them, TEACH them. . . Be My witnesses to all the world."

I like to do all these things -- but, prefer to leave the "Baptize them" to the pastor and the local church fellowship with whom the new believer has become involved.  That local church fellowship is now his/her new spiritual family -- with whom the new believer will share eternal fellowship, in this life and beyond. 

Because following Christ in baptism is so personal -- it is my belief that it is an act which should be experienced in the presence of our new church fellowship family.  So that they, our spiritual family, can join with the new believer is his/her declaration of love for Jesus Christ.

Based upon all that I have disclosed in this writing, I MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT!  Or else this small band of Religion Forum Friends which I will call the Cabal - would not be so diligent in their efforts to "Kill Bill" and his writings. 

Yet, even though the FEW will cast many stones -- I am truly blessed to be sharing God's Word on the TimesDaily Religion Forum, in my Facebook Notes, and in my Friends Ministry eNewsletter.  The Lord has truly blessed me with this ministry.  Thank you, Lord!

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

 

2 Timothy 4-5 - Oldest Tree

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 2 Timothy 4-5 - Oldest Tree
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Salt, my Friend,

 

Actually, I like getting your comments, questions, barks, and bites!  Very often your (by "your" I mean the Malcontent Cabal) unGodly attempts provide me with fodder for new writings.   So, keep throwing your barbed cotton ball insults.  I can use them to explain to the more open minded majority about God, the Bible, and eternal life.  In that sense, YOU are my partner in ministry!  Thank you!

 

Bless your little darkened heart!

 

Bill

1 - Will Work For Jesus_Outline

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1 - Will Work For Jesus_Outline

Hi all,

It truly amazes me to see the different level and tone of responses to the exact same writing - on the Religion Forum and on Facebook.   When I posted this writing on the Religion Forum - an atheist immediately jumped in with his negative comment.  And, I have no doubt that shortly others in the Cabal will feel left out and jump into the sandbox with equal fervor and with equally negative comments.

Yet, the comments on Facebook are totally the opposite.   Is it because Facebook in more of an open and public social forum -- whereas, the small Malcontent Cabal feels greater comfort spreading their good cheer in the more confined space of the TimesDaily Religion Forum?  Is it because they feel they are among a small group of friends who agree with them?  What is the difference?

This is what I have seen posted on this article in Facebook Notes.

 

Shortly after I had posted this same writing on Facebook Notes, I was considering whether I should also send it to those in my Friends Ministry eNewsletter mail list.  At times, if my writing seems to be a wee bit long - I will hesitate to put it into an e-mail.  As I was pondering this dilemma, I get a notification that a Friend has "LIked" my post.  Wow!  That was fast. 

 

Stan is a Christian musician and a busy man; yet, he responded right away.  I took this as a sign that God wanted me to send it as a Friends Ministry eNewsletter.   God is faithful to give us answers - often we are not really expecting them.  This is the dialogue so far on Facebook Notes:


Bill Gray:   Hi Stan, Believe it or not, your response was like an answer from heaven.  I had posted this writing on the Religion Forum and in my Facebook Notes -- and was just wondering if I should send it to my Friends Ministry eNewsletter e-mail group, since it is rather long.  Just as I was thinking what to do -- your "LIKE" on Facebook Notes popped up!  Thank you, Lord, for Friends who will help me make such decisions.  So, now I will go and send it to those in my Friends Ministry mail list.  Thank you, my Friend.  God bless, Bill

Andrea:   The Lord has certainly blessed us both with a beautiful Christian friendship!  Thank you Bill for sharing your insights with me!  God bless, Andrea

Roger:  Thank you Bill for your wonderful spiritual inputs and writing.   2 Timothy 4:5 really puts it out there in regards to doing evangelistic work.  I bring up my beliefs in Jesus and my Heavenly Father all the time when I am out among the public.  Because of my law enforcement background I have a problem with going door to door.  You are no longer among the public, you are on their private property.  Jesus and his disciples would meet with the people mostly out in the public markets, fields, and water wells and would only enter the homes when invited.  When I was stationed at Luke AFB, I had a part time job selling Rainbow Vacuums, and at times I had to go door to door which made me uncomfortable.  With 21 years of law enforcement I know people and they do not want you on their property bringing up the Gospel.

Bill Gray:  Hi Roger, I agree it is hard for some to go door knocking.  I am one of those.  I spent a major part of my life selling computers to large and small companies.  I had no problem making a cold call on the Deputy Director of Caltrans (California Dept of Transportation), seeking to get my company on the bid list for a $10 million computer buy -- but, I could not go to that same man's home and try to sell him insurance.

My wife is great at selling insurance and real estate to individuals -- but, try as she might, she has never been able to get me into selling at that personal level.

But, let me share a neat story with you.  My brother, Bob, was a very successful life insurance agent in Florence, Alabama, and had no problem converting that to door knocking for his Baptist church.

One evening he and an associate were door knocking and an older man came to the door.  My brother introduced himself -- and the old gentleman told him, "I have been looking for you."  Surprised, for he did not know the man, Bob asked, "You were looking for me?"

The man told him, "Yes, my son, Steve, is your brother's auto insurance agent in California.  And, he has told me about you."  As it turned out, my brother and this man ended up being in the same Sunday School class.  God is good!  God bless, Bill

Alfred:  I'm proud to have you as a friend and thank God to see you grow in Christ.   Truly I say, He has chosen you to be a modern high tech evangelist and defender of His Words.

 

My Friends, I pray that God is truly blessing you and your family today.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

 

Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT-1_Outline

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT-1_Outline

Salt, my Friend,

 

Are you sure you are not Vic in drag?  He is the only other Forum Friend who most often cannot think of anything intelligent to write -- so he copy/pastes his previous posts over and over.  It seems that you have that same limitation.

 

Careful who you emulate, it could be catching!

 

Bless your little copy/paste heart!

 

Bill

 

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Salt, my Friend,

 

Are you sure you are not Vic in drag?  He is the only other Forum Friend who most often cannot think of anything intelligent to write -- so he copy/pastes his previous posts over and over.  It seems that you have that same limitation.

 

Careful who you emulate, it could be catching!

 

Bless your little copy/paste heart!

 

Bill

 

---------------

Why are you interested in Vic in drag?

Bill Gray blithers ignorantly:

 

<<<4. There are two Liberal Legalistic Theology followers who tell us they are Christian.  One of them I think actually believes the secular-based"let's keep God out of all public venues and all public life" whale he has swallowed.  And his justification for that is his adamant devotion to his Liberal Legalistic Theology.   The other is just a fellow who appears to be in that senile part of life, who will follow anyone who dangles a worldly carrot in front of him, and who is devoted to his Liberal Legalistic way of life -- even if it means having atheists, agnostics, and all sort of non-believers as his chosen friends and partners in attacking conservative Christian theology.>>>

 

Here Bill has coined a new, though irrelevant and ignorant, terminology, namely "Liberal Legalistic Theology followers. "   Bill evidently entertains his own definitions of the terms "liberall" and "legalistic", and his definitions decidedly do not conform to the commonly-accepted definitions of those terms.

 

Theological liberalism is defined thusly:

 

<<<<Theological liberalism, sometimes known as Protestant Liberalism, is a theological movement rooted in the early 19th century German Enlightenment, notably in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant and the religious views of Friedrich Schleiermacher. It is an attempt to incorporate modern thinking and developments, especially in the sciences, into the Christian faith. Liberalism tends to emphasize ethics over doctrine and experience over Scriptural authority. While essentially a 19th century movement, theological liberalism came to dominate the American mainline churches in the early 20th century. Liberal Christian scholars embraced and encouraged the higher biblical criticism of modern Biblical scholarship>>>>

 

ttp://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/590847/theological-liberalism

 

Now, Bill, if you were honest about such matters, you would concede,on the record of my long history on this forum, that you have accused me of something I most assuredly am NOT guilty of.  I most definitely do NOT subscribe to the above-described tenets of religious liberalism.  If you disagree, they put up the goods; show where I have posted even one thing  that even remotely resembles an emphasis on "ethics over doctrine and experience over Scriptural authority."  Show me where I have attempted to "incorporate modern thinking and developments, especially in the sciences, into the Christian faith."  

 

 

As to religious legalism, here is a concise definition:

 

<<<<Legalism refers to any doctrine which states salvation comes strictly from adherence to the law. It can be thought of as a works-based religion. Groups in the New Testament said to be falling into this category include the PhariseesSadduceesScribesJudaizers, and Nicolaitans. They are legalists because they emphasized obeying the Law of Moses, in the case of the Pharisees and Scribes, to the letter without understanding the concept of grace. Jesus condemned their legalism in Matthew 23. The Pharisees love of the praises of men for their strict adherence is said to be a prime example of legalism.>>>>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legalism_(theology)

 

Again, Bill Gray, SHOW ME where I have posted anything anywhere on this forum alleging that "salvation comes strictly from adherence to the law." or that I support a "works-based religion." And do not be tempted to allege that my position on the necessity of baptism is somehow a "works-based" concept.  I have shown you repeatedly why it is NOT a works-based concept and you have repeatedly declined to post any substantive rebuttal to me on that issue.

 

And besides all that, Bill Gray, I would advise you to read the above definitions carefully and ask yourself just how in thunder any one can possibly be both theologically legalistic and theologically liberal at one and the same time.  If you have even minimal analytical capacity left in your aged brain, you will see that the definitions are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.  It is as possible to be both theologically liberal and theologically legalistic as it is to be both a horse and a horsefly.

 

And as to the silly-ass accusation that I believe in "keep[ing] God out of all public venues and all public life,"  that is just more ignorant blithering from you, Bill.  Your record is badly damaged, stuck irretrievably and repeatedly on the David Barton tomfoolery to which you subscribe.  Public school children are permitted under federal law to VOLUNTARILY pray or carry out other non-disruptive religious activities within the VENUE of public schools, as I have proven to you several times, and I have consistently supported their right to do so. Public, government-operated venues and accommodations that are available for the use of secular organizations are by law required to be made available to religious organizations on the same terms, and I support that.  What I object to, but you embrace, is permitting government to selectively endorse any one religious group or practice over another, but that seems not to bother you, since you are contaminated by the theologically-bigoted, Constitutionally erroneous notion that government-prescribed or government-permitted Judeo-Christian observances, such as public school prayer and Bible-reading, are Constitutionally permissible.  You have no problem permitting government (public school authorities) to compose and prescribe the content of a prayer that public school children are to recite daily.  For all the pious conservative ranting  about government "staying out of our private and personal loves", you and your fellow theocrats would willingly permit government to dictate to your children or grandchildren in the public schools  when to pray, what to pray for, to whom to pray, in whose name to pray and any other content of prayers decided upon by GOVERNMENT.  I don't buy into that, Bill, because I am more conservative on that matter than you are. 

Last edited by Contendah
I'm in a debate with a friend.  He said public schools are allowed to have deacons from baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian and Catholic Church come on to public school property and teach bible study on a regular basis ( like an after school club but on state property)
I said no, public schools will not allow ministers to come on public school property to teach bible study. I think with permission slips it would be nice, but it's not allowed.  

So does anyone know?  Is this allowed ?
Originally Posted by House of David:
I'm in a debate with a friend.  He said public schools are allowed to have deacons from baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian and Catholic Church come on to public school property and teach bible study on a regular basis ( like an after school club but on state property)
I said no, public schools will not allow ministers to come on public school property to teach bible study. I think with permission slips it would be nice, but it's not allowed.  

So does anyone know?  Is this allowed ?

*********

 

Many religious activities are permitted in the public schools, but they must be voluntary, student-initiated activities. The dreaded (by Bill Gray and other right wingnut theocrats) ACLU, jointly with over 30 religious organizations has developed a "Joint Statement on Religion in the Public Schools. It is online at;


https://www.aclu.org/religion-...igion-public-schools

 

The statement lists numerous religious activities that are constitutionally permissible in public schools.I suspect that you, unlike Bill Gray, will not dismiss this valuable information on the basis of disdain for its source.  Perhaps the answer to your question can be found there.

 

Item 13 of the statement reads as follows:

 

"13. Student religious clubs in secondary schools must be permitted to meet and to have equal access to campus media to announce their meetings, if a school receives federal funds and permits any student non-curricular club to meet during non-instructional time. This is the command of the Equal Access Act. A non-curricular club is any club not related directly to a subject taught or soon-to-be taught in the school. Although schools have the right to ban all non-curriculum clubs, they may not dodge the law's requirement by the expedient of declaring all clubs curriculum-related. On the other hand, teachers may not actively participate in club activities and "non-school persons" may not control or regularly attend club meeting."

 

 

Originally Posted by CrustyMac:

Bill DHL™'s narcissism is in full bloom here.  Along with his hypocrisy.

----------------------------

A great deal of egotistical drivel from a common troll with an undeserved self image, bolstered by his narcissism and hypocrisy, all the while expressing his irrational fear of an unnamed cabal firing from the grassy knoll and sabotaging his pc...

Laughable and sad....

 

 

Bill is once again on the wrong side of the issue, both from a secular and religious standpoint.  When this happens, he reverts to name calling using made up labels.

 

For Bill DHL™, to be calling someone senile is the same as a pile of dung calling fresh tilled soil "stinky".  

 

Johhny claims to be a "Conservative Christian" when in reality he is a radical fundamentalist.  One is normal, the other is bat-spit crazy.

Contendah, my Friend,

 

Not sure if others have noticed, but I have noticed that when folks ask you questions regarding the rights of Christians in our public school system and in public venues -- YOU ALWAYS seem to refer to your bible:  an ACLU web page. 

 

Where most Christians refer to the Bible, God's Written Word -- YOU tend to refer to ACLU writings.

 

So, again, with what church are you affiliated -- the Unitarian Universalist church?     Interesting.

 

Bless your secular little heart!

 

Bill

Madelyn Murray O'Hair-1b

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Madelyn Murray O'Hair-1b
Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Contendah, my Friend,

 

Not sure if others have noticed, but I have noticed that when folks ask you questions regarding the rights of Christians in our public school system and in public venues -- YOU ALWAYS seem to refer to your bible:  an ACLU web page. 

 

Where most Christians refer to the Bible, God's Written Word -- YOU tend to refer to ACLU writings.

 

So, again, with what church are you affiliated -- the Unitarian Universalist church?     Interesting.

 

Bless your secular little heart!

 

Bill

 

==============================================

 

The truly interesting thing here, Bill, is how many ways you find to avoid addressing the substance of what I posted on this issue.  Your only recourse seems to be your craven dismissal out of hand of the information provided in that Joint Statement developed by the ACLU and 50 plus religious organizations.  Thus far you have not been able to show that even one of the numerous religious activities described in that statement is prohibited in the public schools.  Ignoring something like that as assiduously as you do is a clear indication that you know it destroys your basic argument that "God and prayer have been kicked out of the schools."  You just CAN"T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

 

I refer to that ACLU web page from time to time because I find it to be the best available comprehensive summary on the matter of religious activity in the public schools.  I have actually read and digested the material therein and that  is my studied and sincere conclusion.  Ignore it if you will, but for all your criticism thus far, you have not attempted to disprove a single sentence of it. 

 

And let me remind you that you, in your theocratically-driven attempts to rationalize government imposition of religious activities in public schools and other venues, have submitted little if any scripture to support your position.  Your asserted basis for promoting such unconstitutional activity

rests on your confused interpretation of the Constitution and your selective use of historical anecdotal statements (mostly from the David Barton archives), but not on scripture, Mr. Pot Calling Kettle Black. 

 

I have challenged you many times, Bill, with the following material I am quoting from my post above, since you once more have ignored it:

 

<<<For all the pious conservative ranting  about government "staying out of our private and personal loves", you and your fellow theocrats would willingly permit government to dictate to your children or grandchildren in the public schools  when to pray, what to pray for, to whom to pray, in whose name to pray and any other content of prayers decided upon by GOVERNMENT.  I don't buy into that, Bill, because I am more conservative on that matter than you are. >>>

 

How about actually responding to that this one time?

Last edited by Contendah

Contendah, my Friend,

 

Just as the FBI does not use counterfeit bills to teach their agents, instead teaching them to recognize the real thing -- in the same way, I do not need to study your ACLU teachings to know that they is counterfeit.

 

As I said, you have your ACLU bible -- and I will rely upon God's Written Word, His Bible.

 

Bless your heart!

 

Bill

Bible vs Google

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Bible vs Google
Last edited by Bill Gray
Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Contendah, my Friend,

 

Just as the FBI does not use counterfeit bills to teach their agents, instead teaching them to recognize the real thing -- in the same way, I do not need to study your ACLU teachings to know that they is counterfeit.

 

As I said, you have your ACLU bible -- and I will rely upon God's Written Word, His Bible.

 

Bless your heart!

_______ 

Bill,

I debated formally, Bill, in both high school and in college.  I can assure you that if any college debater used such a shabby, evasive tactic as you have used in your last post, he or she would go down in flames and be laughed to scorn while still smoking.  You ridiculously purport to know the content and character of a document while acknowledging that you have not even taken the time to read it. That is truly laughable and is intellectually dishonest.  If it is indeed "counterfeit", then you should be able to expose its falsity, but you make no attempt whatsoever to investigate its alleged  "counterfeit" nature.

 

Your defective systematics of analysis would not be acceptable in a formal debating setting, in a court of law, or even in casual coffee table chat.   You are a shameful, pitiful excuse as a defender of Christianity.

But if you  wish to continue to believe that "they is [sic] counterfeit" then continue to do so, thereby matching the quality of your logic with that of your grammar.

Contendah, my Friend,

 

You tell me, "Bill, I debated formally, Bill, in both high school and in college."

 

Good, it will be interesting to see YOU debate with Jesus Christ when He asks you, "Why should I allow you to come into My heaven?"

 

Will you tell Him:  Because I won a high school debate -- or because I was baptized -- or because I always chose to side with atheists against Christian believers -- or, perhaps, because I fought hard to keep God, prayer, and the Bible out of all schools, halls of government, and all public venues.

 

Yes, that will be interesting.

 

Bless your little heart!

 

Bill

1 - USA_Flag-Map_Cross-Hands - NEEDS - Outline-1a

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1 - USA_Flag-Map_Cross-Hands - NEEDS - Outline-1a
Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Contendah, my Friend,

 

You tell me, "Bill, I debated formally, Bill, in both high school and in college."

 

Good, it will be interesting to see YOU debate with Jesus Christ when He asks you, "Why should I allow you to come into My heaven?"

 

Will you tell Him:  Because I won a high school debate -- or because I was baptized -- or because I always chose to side with atheists against Christian believers -- or, perhaps, because I fought hard to keep God, prayer, and the Bible out of all schools, halls of government, and all public venues.

 

Yes, that will be interesting.

 

Bless your little heart!

 

Bill

 

____

All that fantasy raving nonsense does absolutely nothing to redeem your shabby, ignorant, evasive, and downright cowardly refusal to discuss the actual issues I have raised, Bill Gray.  You are a cheap-shot artist, Bill.  You esteem yourself as some kind of cyber-apostle of the Internet.  Instead, you have become a laughingstock and an embarrassment to the very cause you purport to represent. If Jesus Christ was a debate coach, you would be the last person He would choose for His team.

 

Now go ahead and tell yourself that such a rebuke is only part of the "persecution" you must endure for allegedly being in God's corner, virtually alone here, deflecting the fiery barbs launched against you by the "cabal."  Disgusting! 

 

Unbelievable!!!! Contendah laid it all out in black and white, with a little blue thrown in for color, when, where, how, and why students may publicly pray in schools... And went so far as to field good questions regarding the subject... And along comes the resident troll, in what I'm fairly certain he wishes may be his closing statement, insisting that Contendah and others of fighting hard to keep God, prayer, and the Bible out of all schools, halls of government, and all public venues.

 

He has already admitted that he doesn't bother reading the Constitution... I'm beginning to believe he doesn't bother reading the very posts to which he responds. Or perhaps his cognitive skills are so impaired as to prevent an understanding of what he reads? What a blithering idiot...

Originally Posted by Dove of Peace:
 

Unbelievable!!!! Contendah laid it all out in black and white, with a little blue thrown in for color, when, where, how, and why students may publicly pray in schools... And went so far as to field good questions regarding the subject... And along comes the resident troll, in what I'm fairly certain he wishes may be his closing statement, insisting that Contendah and others of fighting hard to keep God, prayer, and the Bible out of all schools, halls of government, and all public venues.

 

He has already admitted that he doesn't bother reading the Constitution... I'm beginning to believe he doesn't bother reading the very posts to which he responds. Or perhaps his cognitive skills are so impaired as to prevent an understanding of what he reads? What a blithering idiot...

_____________________________________________

Bill's latest blithering might or might not be his "closing statement", but he would be well advised to make it his last in this string, thus avoiding more much-deserved scorn and embarrassment to himself.

Contendah, my Friend,

 

By George, you found my only mistake this year!   But, joking aside, many times I have seen great graphics - and then found something like this misspelled word or a misused word.   Those I do not archive.   But, I will admit -- this one I missed.  

 

Thank you, my Friend.  This one I will have to delete now.   But, not before I post it on Facebook suggesting to folks who create neat graphics -- check your spelling before posting.

 

However, the intended message still stands.   The Bible has all the answers; Google DOES NOT!

 

Thank you and God bless, 

 

Bill

Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT-1_Outline

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT-1_Outline

Hi all,

 

FOR THE RECORD!   This is posted on Facebook:

 

A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS! - Or so I have always been told. Yet, a picture/graphic with a MISSPELLED word can bite you in the butt - a thousand times!

 

Let me give you an example. A while back I archived this really cool graphic and have used it several times in my Religion Forum posts. Today, it bit me in the butt. A very legalistic Christian Friend, who relishes finding a conservative Christian in error, even if it means siding with non-believers, accurately shoved this one up my nose:

 

"Bill Gray delights in posting 'cute' little illustrated sayings, such as the one below. Check out the spelling on this one see if it 'dosen't' amuse you."

 

My Friends, when you create a neat graphic which we all can use -- PLEASE check your spelling before posting it. There are a hundred different ways to check spelling online - or even do as I have had to do lately - pull that dictionary off the shelf, blow off the dust, and find your word - BEFORE posting the graphic!

 

Normally, I am diligent in checking for misspelled or misused words when archiving graphics. But, as this shows -- once or twice I have missed that awful word, such as DOSEN'T instead of DOESN'T.

 

On the other hand, if we were perfect Jesus wasted His time dying for us. God bless, Bill

 

Contendah, my Friend, I pray that I have made the proper amends and that you have forgiven my egregious error.   I promise to be more diligent in the future.

 

And, yes, Crusty -- I do realize the the correct spelling is Johnny!

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

FOR THE RECORD, I WILL REPLACE THE OTHER

GRAPHIC WITH THIS ONE.  KIND OF NEAT, RIGHT?

Bible Still Relevant Today

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Bible Still Relevant Today

So now, Bill, I am no longer your "liberal. legalistic" friend, only your "very legalistic" friend?

Does this mean that my little dissertation on the impossibility of being simultaneously liberal and legalistic actually registered with you?  

 

As to any forgiveness on my part for your "egregious error" in carelessly conscripting that misspelled item, there is no "forgiveness" involved, since I never held you to have offended me with your sloppy choice of that ungrammatical snippet; wryly amused, perhaps, but not offended.  Your performance on this forum provides me and others with many more far more ssignificant things to be offended with than that, most notably your dogged refusal to manfully face up to challenging issues raised by others.  Your dodging, weaving, crawfishing, smokescreening, and in general your chronic intellectual dishonesty  are the truly offensive  aspects of your offensive performance here.

It seems to be a case of OEAE:  Once Evasive-Always Evasive.

Last edited by Contendah
Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

 

 DON'T YOU LOVE IT WHEN THE KIDDIES 

GATHER TO PLAY THEIR LITTLE GAMES?

 

******************************************************************************************

**************************************************************************************** 

Another witless post by a whipped puppy!  

 

Bill can not face up to the TRUTH on the Constitutional issue he distorts.  He will not even attempt any rebuttal to challenges directed his way on such issues as prayer in public schools and other religious exercises designed and implemented by civil government.  He refuses even to read material submitted by others in support of their side of the issue, instead blithely declaring it to be "counterfeit', but with nothing to back that claim.  

 

But he has a nice little graphics library to play with and to give him the false comfort that he has actually scored a point.  

 

TRULY, The most pitiable sustained performance I have ever seen by anyone on any topic on any forum!

 

DONE BEEN WHUPPED!!

Last edited by Contendah

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×