when this Email arrived...

Dead on...

“The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”
Original Post
And the REASON we elected him was this:

The danger to America was not George W. Bush, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of a Bush presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Bush, who was a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a George W. Bush, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.
You are absolutely correct Cage.

When Obama won the election, I posted this.

Romans 16:18

For such men are slaves, not of our Lord Christ but of their own appetites; and by their smooth and flattering speech they deceive the hearts of the unsuspecting.

Followed by... "Who woulda thunk it?? The Bible predicted 65 million morons voting for Barrack Obama in November of 2008." Wink
IS this the latest propoganda de jour for FOXOPHILES?

You THUGS are either getting overly paranoid or just plain looseing it, what with the talk of "civil wars" and "slaves"

Did the boiling over of your great TEABAGGER election and the PR carnage that has followed push you over the edge?

Or is it you are finally realizing that you may have someone like MICHELE BACHMANN at the top of the THUG ticket in 2012????????? Confused
quote:
Originally posted by rocky:
IS this the latest propoganda de jour for FOXOPHILES?

You THUGS are either getting overly paranoid or just plain looseing it, what with the talk of "civil wars" and "slaves"

Did the boiling over of your great TEABAGGER election and the PR carnage that has followed push you over the edge?

Or is it you are finally realizing that you may have someone like MICHELE BACHMANN at the top of the THUG ticket in 2012????????? Confused


That's a funny post rockie... I'm not Michele Bachmann's biggest fan by any means... but look at who represents YOU!! Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank... What a list of LOSERS that you support. For anyone who has that list of names as leadership positions in their party to attack any person from the other party is being VERY short sided. LMAO!!!
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Dittohead:
quote:
attack any person from the other party is being VERY short sided. LMAO!!!


How does that work? Which side?


I think it works both ways... however, the loons reside mostly on the D side of the isle. Ron Paul is the wackiest R, and he is only an R because you gotta have a letter attached. He is really a libitarian, and we need to be listening to him on economic issues. Ya'll's wack jobs are hopeless and bring nothing useful to the table.
Paul could switch to Inde, but then he wouldnt get money from the RNC.

I look forward to the day when OBamacare is repealed and the whole country gets Romneycare, which includes prescription drug coverage for everyone!!!

There is no difference between parties on fiscal issues, only social issues.
quote:
Originally posted by Peter Rielly:
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Dittohead:
quote:
attack any person from the other party is being VERY short sided. LMAO!!!


How does that work? Which side?


I think it works both ways... however, the loons reside mostly on the D side of the isle. Ron Paul is the wackiest R, and he is only an R because you gotta have a letter attached. He is really a libitarian, and we need to be listening to him on economic issues. Ya'll's wack jobs are hopeless and bring nothing useful to the table.


Just what is a "libitarian"??

Add Reply

Likes (0)
Post

×
×
×
×