quote:
Originally posted by tcf531:
did he throw the money back inti (sic) the temple or did he buy a field?
Hi TCF,
According to Matthew 27:5-9, Judas threw the silver on the floor of the temple and left. The Pharisees and Chief Priests took the silver, which by law they could not put back into the temple treasury since it was blood money -- and they bought the land where Judas hung himself. The land was defiled because Judas hung himself and hang there for several days. He hang himself on Passover; so, no one could take him down to bury him. They would be defiled if they touched a dead body -- and they could not work during the day of Passover.
So, Judas hung there, his body decomposing causing gases to build up inside his body. So, when he either fell because the rope broke or someone cut him down and he fell -- the fall causes his body to burst open.
Therefore, both the story in Matthew 27 is correct -- telling us how he died. And, the story in Acts 1 is correct -- telling us the end result of his death. Complementary stories, supporting one another.
Matthew 27:3-10,
"Then Judas, His betrayer, seeing that He had been condemned, was remorseful and brought back the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying, 'I have sinned by betraying innocent blood.' And they said, 'What is that to us? You see to it!' Then he threw down the pieces of silver in the temple and departed, and went and hanged himself.
But the chief priests took the silver pieces and said, 'It is not lawful to put them into the treasury, because they are the price of blood.' And they consulted together and bought with them the potter's field, to bury strangers in. Therefore that field has been called the Field of Blood to this day. Then was fulfilled what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet, saying, 'And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the value of Him who was priced, whom they of the children of Israel priced, and gave them for the potter's field, as the LORD directed me.'" Acts 1:15-19,
"And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples (altogether the number of names was about a hundred and twenty), and said, 'Men and brethren, this Scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke before by the mouth of David concerning Judas, who became a guide to those who arrested Jesus; for he was numbered with us and obtained a part in this ministry.'
(Now this man purchased a field with the wages of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his entrails gushed out. And it became known to all those dwelling in Jerusalem; so that field is called in their own language, Akel Dama, that is, Field of Blood.)" So, did the Chief Priests buy the land or did Judas buy the land? Technically, both. Judas had been paid the blood money to betray Jesus Christ. It was his money -- even though he threw it back on the temple floor and left it there. The Priests took Judas' money and purchased the Potter's Field where he died in his name, even though he was already dead. So, the land belonged to Judas; but the priests handled the transaction in his name.
But, so that you will not think this is just Bill Gray saying this -- I am offering two other sources:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Apologetics Press :: Alleged Discrepancies
Did Judas Die Twice? http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2846 Through the years, the description of Judas Iscariot’s death has been one of the most popular alleged Bible contradictions. It seems as if every skeptical book or Web site that questions the integrity of the Bible lists Judas’ death as one of the most obvious inconsistencies in Scripture.
Whereas Matthew records that Judas
“went and hanged himself” after betraying Jesus for 30 pieces of silver (27:5), Luke records that
“falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his entrails gushed out” (Acts 1:18). Because Matthew only mentions Judas being hanged, while Luke mentions Judas falling headlong and bursting open at his midsection, a “real” contradiction supposedly is staring us in the face.
The truth of the matter is, however, like the accounts of Jesus’ resurrection (and many other Bible events) these two verses simply supplement each other. It is not an either/or scenario. Judas, indeed,
“hanged himself,” and sometime later, his body fell headfirst, causing his midsection to burst open.
According to ancient tradition, Judas hanged himself above the Valley of Hinnom on the edge of a cliff. Eventually the rope snapped (or was cut or untied), thus causing his body to fall headfirst into the field below, as Luke described. Matthew does not deny that Judas fell and had his entrails gush out, and Luke does not deny that Judas hanged himself. In short,
Matthew records the method in which Judas attempted his death. Luke reports the end result. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
DEATH OF JUDAS http://www.thebereancall.org/node/2361 A brother asks me to explain the evident contradiction as to the manner of the death of Judas, as found in Matt. 27:5 and Acts 1:18. There, is no contradiction. Luke says that Judas fell headlong and burst asunder, while Matthew says that he hanged himself.
If he had not first hanged himself, he would not have burst asunder when he fell. I have never heard of a man bursting wide open because he fell from stumping his toe; but if a man were to hang himself in a hot climate, and remain hanging for a day or two, and then fall, he would be almost certain to burst asunder. So the two accounts are not contradictory, but the one explains the other (J. W. McGarvey,
"Short Essays in Biblical Criticism," 1910, p. 457).
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,
Bill