http://www.weeklystandard.com/...s_720543.html?page=1
There is becoming, as many suspected, clear information that there was DELIBERATE moves within the Administration, potentially up to and including Obama, to conceal information regarding the attack on the Libyan embassy and the deaths of four Americans including our Ambassador.
It's going to be interesting to see how the staunch Democrats on this forum defend these moves which no doubt happened to conceal Administration failures regarding this deliberate planned attack on the US. Why would the Administration do such a thing? There are plenty of possible answers including embarrassment that they didn't know what to do or that they completely failed and handled this totally wrong. An even more possible cause is the then upcoming election.
Can anyone remember Watergate and the coverup of the breakin to possibly protect Richard Nixon's re-election? I can almost guarntee that there will be no anger or condemnation either by Democrats or the mainstream media regarding thisBUT if it were Republicans in office?????
Note that it wasn't the breakin that was what led to Nixon's impeachment but the Coverup so IF Watergate was justification for Richard Nixon resigning or risking impeachment then what is so different about the Obama Administration other than it's Democratic, Liberal, and that the President is the first minority President?
That being the case everyone knows, including Obama, that there is NO WAY that he (Obama) will ever be impeached no matter what he does.