Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Jack Flash:
Originally Posted by Fr J:
The Catholic Church welcomes scientific inquiry regarding miraculous claims. The scientists don't verify that something is miraculous but that science cannot explain its existence.
I couldn't find the published article from Dr Bulgart, nor any information about him. Regarding the 49 other scientists, wouldn't at least one of them have published something about this?
Catholics don't need science to prove the miraculous for us, but to help us not be deceived or manipulated by false claims.

It doesn't matter if Jesus Christ personally told concondie, he's not going

to believe it unless it comes from the abridged bible he worships. He has

enough to discuss with, but fanatic fear won't allow anything but panic.

So I wonder why he bothers with a reply in the first place.? Any ideas.?

____

Just trying to shine the light of reason on the matter such that that even a determinedly ignorant goober like you can become a touch more enlightened. So far, I confess to have had no success in that endeavor.  It seems that it would be easier to penetrate the heaviest grade of military armor than to install even the tiniest quantity of good sense within that shriveled knot of tissue within your thick skull.

 

Originally Posted by CrustyMac:

Whoever painted the crowns (obviously after the fact) should be tried for heresy. 

Yeah, the two crowns were added later by the faithful in thanksgiving for

graces received, and too far out of proportion for the image.

Still, it doesn't help explain the fact of no dye, paint or known color was

used in the image. But it being several feet deep is the kicker. 

 

Originally Posted by Jack Flash:
Originally Posted by CrustyMac:

Whoever painted the crowns (obviously after the fact) should be tried for heresy. 

Yeah, the two crowns were added later by the faithful in thanksgiving for

graces received, and too far out of proportion for the image.

Still, it doesn't help explain the fact of no dye, paint or known color was

used in the image. But it being several feet deep is the kicker. 

____

And nothing you have posted thus far "explains" those "facts." The kicker is the absence of documentation of any credible kind.

 

Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash:
Originally Posted by CrustyMac:

Whoever painted the crowns (obviously after the fact) should be tried for heresy. 

Yeah, the two crowns were added later by the faithful in thanksgiving for

graces received, and too far out of proportion for the image.

Still, it doesn't help explain the fact of no dye, paint or known color was

used in the image. But it being several feet deep is the kicker. 

____

And nothing you have posted thus far "explains" those "facts." The kicker is the absence of documentation of any credible kind.

 

The facts themselves would require me to explain God  ....... Maybe you

could give it a try, you with your Jesus complex shouldn't be any trouble.

  

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×