Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Do you support the Constitution of the United States? Hon. Barack H. Obama will be sworn in as the 44th President of the USA in January 2009. There is a Democratic majority in the House, and I am sure that they will not impeach Hon. Barack H. Obama, and if they were to impeach (shortly after a swarm of pigs were to alight on the Mall) would a Democratic majority in Senate be enough to permit a convinction, since it takes 2/3 of the Senate to convict? This is too ludicrous to even consider as moot.

Hon. Barack H. Obama will become the next President of the United States of America, and there is nothing you can do to stop it. He will be, indeed, as of January, "Your President."
Bad losers, the both of you, sky and Phoenix!

The stuff you are putting up so far is simply the sour grapes ranting of disappointed and misinformed right wingnuts!

He most assuredly IS YOUR PRESIDENT, Phoenix, snarky bumper stickers notwithstanding. He is, you must remember, the President of the United States! If you are a citizen of the United States, the cold hard logic dictates that he is YOUR President. If you truly cannot abide his being YOUR President, then you might consider abandoning your U.S. citizenship and applying for citizenship in some country where you will feel more at ease with the elected officialdom.

As to the charge of Obama being fraudently elected, sky, THAT is a very strong accusation. Such accusations are very easy to make, since words are cheap indeed. You have submitted absolutely nothing but an accusation. If you desire credibility, you should post some credible basis for your accusation of fraud. Surely you will not contend, in light of his landslide victory, that Obama won through voter fraud. But should you venture there, you need to provide more than a few anecdotal "illustrations" of what you are calling "fraud," since there is never a national election completely devoid of some attempts to tamper with the vote. Be reminded, also, that for "fraud" to occur with respect to an election outcome, there must be fraud at the polls--fraud resulting from persons actually showing up and voting without being properly qualified to do so or fraud resulting from votes by live people in behalf of dead people or fraud arising from persons voting more than one time. SO the burden of proof is on YOU to demonstrate some tangible basis for your accusation of fraud, whether voter fraud or fraud in some other form. Do your best and we will objectively evaluate your efforts, but PL-E-E-E-A-SE (!) put up something other than a raw, unexplicated, unqualified, unsubstantiated generic accusation. That won't take you anywhere in a marketplace of ideas!
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Bad losers, the both of you, sky and Phoenix!

As to the charge of Obama being fraudently elected, sky, THAT is a very strong accusation. Such accusations are very easy to make, since words are cheap indeed. You have submitted absolutely nothing but an accusation. If you desire credibility, you should post some credible basis for your accusation of fraud. Surely you will not contend, in light of his landslide victory, that Obama won through voter fraud. But should you venture there, you need to provide more than a few anecdotal "illustrations" of what you are calling "fraud," since there is never a national election completely devoid of some attempts to tamper with the vote. Be reminded, also, that for "fraud" to occur with respect to an election outcome, there must be fraud at the polls--fraud resulting from persons actually showing up and voting without being properly qualified to do so or fraud resulting from votes by live people in behalf of dead people or fraud arising from persons voting more than one time. SO the burden of proof is on YOU to demonstrate some tangible basis for your accusation of fraud, whether voter fraud or fraud in some other form. Do your best and we will objectively evaluate your efforts, but PL-E-E-E-A-SE (!) put up something other than a raw, unexplicated, unqualified, unsubstantiated generic accusation. That won't take you anywhere in a marketplace of ideas!


This isn't even the good stuff. I know you ain't gonna believe it anyway.


Link

Link

Link

Link

Link
Do you honetly think that 7,000,000 people voted twice or more to give Hon. Barack H. Obama his plurality of votes?

Seven Million. Seven times one thousand times one thousand.

Even if they did, how does that affect Senator Obama? Did he have Oprah give each one a new car to get the votes?

Get over yourselves. McCain got slaughtered, just like Goldwater did in 1964 in the electoral college. Just like Daddy Bush did in Fritz Mondale and St. Ronald did to Jimmy Carter.

Just get over it, or else move. You might like Somalia, they have no actual law there at all, just roving bands of Muslim Religous Police and the Ethopian army. No zoning, no taxes, no nothing you dislike! You can form your own militia! Only take AK-47 ammo or gold as legal tender! Some of the ladies are quite striking, like Iman, David Bowie's wife. You can marry 3 or 4 of them for a few camels and cartons of smokes.
This subject is a sad statement about how some people actually think and act. It is such nonsense that got us caught in the trap of George W. Bush and the current state of the country. Now, sadly, they vehemently libel President Elect Obama while demonstrating their ignorance of our governing documents. It is such nonsense that unfortunately misrepresents many in the Shoals Area.
quote:
Phoenix--why don't you just take a wait and see approach. You might be pleasantly surprised. But first you must open that closed
little mind of yours.


Nah obstinance suits me. I'd rather raise hell, you know. stay ahead of the curve. Once it's clear his policies will result in the unemployment of millions I think you'll agree. Taxes and class warfare don't create jobs.
quote:
Originally posted by Ginger Root:
beternU ,you ask for proof of fraud voting ,,heres your sign . At least 112,000 may have voted twice and thats in just one state. Roll Eyes

you can handle the truth . lol

Link


Link


As someone who lives in Atlanta and saw the original story, it has nothing to do with acorn, but people who have homes in two states, or moved without informing their former state to take them off the list.

What makes you think that every last one of them voted for Obama, or for a matter of fact, did you know that its your responsibility to inform your former state to take your name of the list? I doubt you did. For what its worth the guy the profiled was a sixty-something republican, so using your logic we know McCain got at least one double vote.
quote:
Originally posted by Ginger Root:
beternU ,you ask for proof of fraud voting ,,heres your sign . At least 112,000 may have voted twice and thats in just one state. Roll Eyes

you can handle the truth . lol

Link


Link


You did not read very carefully. What you posted said that, "A check of Georgia's master voter rolls revealed more than 42,000 people who also appear to be registered in Florida. WSB-TV Channel 2 found three who appear to have double voted, which is a felony."

It is not voter fraud to be REGISTERED in two states. It IS voter fraud to actually VOTE in two states. WSB was able to find only 2 cases of the latter. Just how many people do you really believe actually VOTED in 2 states, and how can you prove THAT?

And as for those Alabama records you linked in, what difference would that make even IF there was voter fraud, since this redneck state went for McCain big time? If there WAS fraud, did the hapless McCain benefit from it? In any case, it could not possibly have helped Obama!
quote:
Originally posted by geddon97:
Just remember you cant blame conservative for the next four years.Only yourselves.Now what are you libs going to do about that?Probably whine.


I can take it. I think it will be fun being on the other side for a while. Exercize you freedom of speech - complain all you want.

Hmmmmm.....I am really looking forward to the three or more Supreme Court appointments coming up.
It's truly amazing that the Times Daily would allow this thread to continue! They'll let all this racist crap boil up, but let a 31 yo coach try to have an affair with a 13 yo and post about it, they yank it right down.

And keep him on the payroll to boot so he can become VESTED in the retirement system! Bet if he was a black coach he'd be in jail!

You people disgust me! Go to church on Sunday and Wednesday night and racist pigs the rest of the week! The south will never rise again because you're too **** stuck in the past!

Ignorance is bliss eh? Hope you teach your children well! Funny thing about it, most of you act like perfect little Christians in public and act like racist radicals behind closed doors on your computers!


Still for Inditing Coach Brewer Now!!!!!!!!
quote:
Originally posted by Phoenix Rising:


Nah obstinance suits me. I'd rather raise hell, you know. stay ahead of the curve. Once it's clear his policies will result in the unemployment of millions I think you'll agree. Taxes and class warfare don't create jobs.


Hopefully, abstinance suits you, because you don't need to be polluting the gene pool any further. Of course, we all know how well abstinence-only sex education works... Roll Eyes

Obstinance? I think you'll have to submit that one for inclusion in the dictionary. Until your post, it didn't exist.
quote:
Originally posted by nnpc:
It's truly amazing that the Times Daily would allow this thread to continue! They'll let all this racist crap boil up, but let a 31 yo coach try to have an affair with a 13 yo and post about it, they yank it right down.

And keep him on the payroll to boot so he can become VESTED in the retirement system! Bet if he was a black coach he'd be in jail!

You people disgust me! Go to church on Sunday and Wednesday night and racist pigs the rest of the week! The south will never rise again because you're too **** stuck in the past!

Ignorance is bliss eh? Hope you teach your children well! Funny thing about it, most of you act like perfect little Christians in public and act like racist radicals behind closed doors on your computers!


Still for Inditing Coach Brewer Now!!!!!!!!


nnpc,I have gone back and looked at each post on this thread, and the only racist post I can find is yours. Why is it that everytime a leftist runs out of ammo, he/she digs up the racist bomb?
I am sick of people being called a racist just because someone wants to throw a temper tantrum and doesn't have anything else to fuss about!
If a teacher tried, or did,molest a student then I'm all about bringing them to justice(notice I used no color qualifier)! If that has happened and you know for a fact that nothing was done contact the Attorney Generals office and file an official complaint, but don't label people you don't know as racist when none of them have even mentioned race.
Unhappy with the POLITICAL comments about Obama? Sorry about that, but this is America and we are allowed to speak out against our leaders if we do not agree with them!
Some of those posting here may not like Obama because he is black, that is their perogative, I don't agree with that viewpoint,but so far we don't control the opinion of people in this country.
I think most of those who are not happy with Obama feel that way not because he is black, but because of his decidedly leftist viewpoint.
He after all says he supports the 2nd Amendment, while at the same time apparently believes that the over 22,000 gun laws we currently have in this country aren't sufficient to control the criminals who abuse firearms! If 22,000 laws aren't enough what kind of so called 'common sense' law is needed to prevent crime? Every possible criminal use of a firearm is already legislated against and is a violation of a number of different laws! What possible law against an inanimate object could possibly do any more than the current 22,000+ can't do? Any thoughts? Can you say BAN?
What about taking one citizens money and giving it to another citizen (or possibly to someone who is not even a citizen)? I know a lot of leftists are all about that, but I still believe in the REAL America, you know, the one where your private possessions can't be taken from you without due process of law! Obamas 'spreading of wealth' would apparently help me considerably, because my income is well into the 'poor' category. Guess what, I DON"T WANT IT,IT BELONGS TO SOMEONE ELSE!!! If I want more than I have I'll get a JOB!!!
Which takes us to 'Due Process of Law'. Obama (he is a Constitutional Scholar don't you know) doesn't believe the Constitution means what it says! He doesn't believe that the Amendment process as provided for in the Constitution is adequate to change the Constitution, he wants to appoint Supreme Court Justices who rule not on the law or the Constitution but by their 'feelings'!
That is SOME of what I don't like about Obama, notice again that I said nothing about race!
You might look at things sometime without the filter of race over your eyes, you will find things much easier see.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×