Skip to main content

"An Isis commander at a terrorist training camp north of Baghdad accidentally detonated a belt packed with explosives during a demonstration in front of a group militants on Monday, killing himself and 21 nearby trainees.

 

The accident was a source of dark humour for locals, with suicide attacks in public spaces having become an almost daily occurrence in Iraq.

 

A bomber struck a falafel shop near the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Baghdad last week, and when told of the bungled training demonstration by the New York Times, Raad Hashim, who works at a liquor store near the site of the bombing, burst out laughing.

This is so funny,” he said. “It shows how stupid they are, those dogs and sons of dogs.”

 

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014...ows-up-his-own-class

 

Reportedly, his last words were, "Pay attention, I won't repeat myself."

TRUTH -- THE NEW HATE SPEECH!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

But what about female martyrs? What is promised to them in the afterlife?

According to Muslim scholars, female martyrs can expect to find their husbands in paradise. A woman who had multiple husbands in life will be able to choose the best one as her eternal spouse in the afterlife.

Religious commentators state that paradise will make female martyrs beautiful and happy, and satisfied to be with only one man. Additionally, their earthly devotion to Allah will make them superior to the virgin maidens in heaven, and thus their husband's affections will never stray.

 

http://www.livescience.com/623...promise-martyrs.html

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

But what about female martyrs? What is promised to them in the afterlife?

According to Muslim scholars, female martyrs can expect to find their husbands in paradise. A woman who had multiple husbands in life will be able to choose the best one as her eternal spouse in the afterlife.

Religious commentators state that paradise will make female martyrs beautiful and happy, and satisfied to be with only one man. Additionally, their earthly devotion to Allah will make them superior to the virgin maidens in heaven, and thus their husband's affections will never stray.

 

http://www.livescience.com/623...promise-martyrs.html


So what if a male with multiple wives is chosen by two females?

Last edited by Scro

Democrats keep pushing for wars??????

Where in the world did you dream that statement up?

Today in the Times Daily editorial page, Cal Thomas advocates using an army to fight ISIS.  If you send 200,000 battle hardened troops over there, there won't be any visible enemy to fight.  That battle has to be done from within.  

Did Cal Thomas switch from republican to democrat?  Per your post, he must have.

I don't like wars either and wish the democrats would stop pushing for them. I wish our troops were home, rebuilding, helping legal citizens here, and guarding THIS country from invasion.

 

Your statement.  You wish democrats would quit pushing for wars.  Cal Thomas is not a democrat, he is a conservative republican.  He had a column on the editorial page of the Times Daily advocating using an army to fight ISIS. This is one case of a republican for war.

In the last 30 years

Bush Jr started two unfunded wars.

Bush Sr started and ended one war.

Reagan got 232 marines blown up.

I suppose I missed all the wars that democrats started. Refresh my memory.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Cal Thomas? Refresh my memory, which office does he hold?

___

Davis did not identify Cal Thomas as an office holder.  Thomas is a Republican who supported the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. You are reading into Davis' post something that is not there. Typical knee-jerk Bestworking blithering.

I told you who Cal Thomas is.  A columnist not an elected official.  He supports the wars that republicans started. Now, you tell me who the democrats are who continue to support the wars that was based on lies.

John McCain is an elected republican, he is a regular on news shows and wants more troops in the mideast.  Linsey Graham is an elected republican who supports more military action in the mideast. There's two republicans who currently support wars, tell me who the democrat leaders are who support more wars, death and destruction.

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

I told you who Cal Thomas is.  A columnist not an elected official.  He supports the wars that republicans started. Now, you tell me who the democrats are who continue to support the wars that was based on lies.

John McCain is an elected republican, he is a regular on news shows and wants more troops in the mideast.  Linsey Graham is an elected republican who supports more military action in the mideast. There's two republicans who currently support wars, tell me who the democrat leaders are who support more wars, death and destruction.

_____________________________________________

As to Dems who support more, I'd point to Obama first. He supported the actions in Libya that left that nation in chaos and Americans dead and our embassy, now evacuated.  He supported, then backed off Syria, leaving ISIS to seize territory to grow into the monstrosity its become. 

 

Congrats, Obama!  You ordered the killing of Osama.  Then, the release of al Baghdadi, who now heads ISIS --- a group so crazed for blood, even al Qaeda doesn't want them. 

Last edited by direstraits

Clinton: 'Our target was terror'

August 21, 1998 Web posted at: 5:10 a.m. EDT (0910 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- American cruise missiles pounded sites in Afghanistan and Sudan Thursday in retaliation for the deadly bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania on August 7."Let our actions today send this message loud and clear -- there are no expendable American targets," U.S. President Clinton said in a televised address to the American people Thursday evening. "There will be no sanctuary for terrorists. We will defend our people, our interests and our values."

U.S. officials say the six sites attacked in Afghanistan were part of a network of terrorist compounds near the Pakistani border that housed supporters of millionaire Osama bin Laden.

U.S.: Bin Laden's network planning new attacks

Clinton said that information gathered by American intelligence showed that a network of terrorists affiliated with bin Laden was responsible for the bombings in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, which killed 257 people, including 12 Americans.

"Our mission was clear -- to strike at the network of radical groups affiliated with, and funded by, Osama bin Laden, the pre-eminent organizer and financier of international terrorism in the world today," Clinton said.

Cohen: 'No sanctuary for terrorists'

U.S. Defense Secretary William Cohen said the goal of the strikes was to disrupt and attempt to destroy the suspected training and support facilities used to train "hundreds, if not thousands, of terrorists."  (Audio  1.9 MB / 20 sec. AIFF or WAV sound)

"We recognize these strikes will not eliminate the problem," Cohen said. "But our message is clear. There will be no sanctuary for terrorists and no limit to our resolve to defend American citizens and our interests -- our ideals of democracy and law -- against these cowardly attacks."

Cohen said planning for the attack began within the past week, after U.S. intelligence confirmed bin Laden's involvement in the terrorist bombings.

Albright: 'They can hide, but not escape justice'

U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright called on the international community to take whatever action was necessary to "deter and defeat terrorist acts."

http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/20/us.strikes.02/

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5p-qIq32m8

 

 

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Yugoslavia, Vietnam.

Tell me, I'm not real sure, did Clinton send troops to the Yugoslavia region? What was the outcome?

Did Eisenhower sign the treaty for Viet Nam and Kennedy started sending troops there. Johnson and Nixon followed and the military industrial complex got rich.

________________________________________________________________

LBJ sent over 555,000 troops to Nam vs. the few hundred JFK sent.  LBJ later admitted he had no idea how to end the war.  Nixon withdrew troops, negotiated a treaty with the North and made a promise to the South Viet Namese to supply weapons and munitions after we withdrew. 

 

Later, as Nixon resigned, a Democrat congress reneged on the promise to provided materiel and munitions.  Resulting in 990,000 successfully fleeing on anything that would float or fly and tens of thousands more drowning in the attempt.  Fleeing was a good choice as 737,000 were exterminated as communists did when they took over a nation.

 

Its a bit strange for Dems to bring up the industrial complex over and over, that Eisenhower covered in his 17 January farewell speech to the nation, without ever mentioning his warnings about the rise of the over regulated technachy state in the second part of the same speech.  I'm old enough to remember Democrat political propaganda against Ike -- one would swear the man was illiterate .if one believed their rants.  The same man who was Supreme Commander of Allied forces, one of our greatest diplomat-generals and cleaned up the mess the Dems made of Korea.

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

I told you who Cal Thomas is.  A columnist not an elected official.  He supports the wars that republicans started. Now, you tell me who the democrats are who continue to support the wars that was based on lies.

John McCain is an elected republican, he is a regular on news shows and wants more troops in the mideast.  Linsey Graham is an elected republican who supports more military action in the mideast. There's two republicans who currently support wars, tell me who the democrat leaders are who support more wars, death and destruction.

------------------------

Oh, so you are finally admitting democrats are liars and connivers. You keep going back to Cal Thomas, again, like the man having an opinion somehow means something. I don't even know who his is, but listen sport, do me a favor, when he gets into a position where he can actually make decisions that matter, give me a shout.  That is if someone tells you or you get an email.

Last edited by Bestworking

Oh, so you are finally admitting democrats are liars and connivers. You keep going back to Cal Thomas, again, like the man having an opinion somehow means something. I don't even know who his is, but listen sport, do me a favor, when he gets into a position where he can actually make decisions that matter, give me a shout.  That is if someone tells you or you get an email.

 

Who do you get to write your stuff?  After reading your postings, I really believe you aren't capable of doing it.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×