Just goes to show that they won't practice what they preach.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0307/3258.html
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:Originally posted by Kindred_Spirit:
I will read that link WHEN Bush stops lieing to the American Public, and when it is proven FOR A FACT that none of his promises were ever broken... Then we shall give them at least SIX months of service, and talk about it...
Otherwise, this is just a moot point.
quote:Originally posted by stephanie:
Again SP---you read my mind...
Funny how all of the NEGATIVE links get read IMMEDIATELY and raved about, but the ones that are disagreed with get ignored...
kind of like looking at a car wreck -- you just can't help yourself...hmmmm
quote:Originally posted by Southern Patriot:quote:Originally posted by Kindred_Spirit:
I will read that link WHEN Bush stops lieing to the American Public, and when it is proven FOR A FACT that none of his promises were ever broken... Then we shall give them at least SIX months of service, and talk about it...
Otherwise, this is just a moot point.
I will re-post this from another thread. Maybe you will get the hint.
"You are completely in to bash mode. No need to try and have a calm discussion with you. All you have is "Bush lied" and name calling."
quote:Originally posted by stephanie:
KS--I have stated several times to try to keep the argueing to a minimum I will not respond to you, but on this one I will...
You ARE entitled to your opinion. I am entitled to mine. My opinion is that you say I don't want to hear your opinion when you don't know. I have agreed with you on some things, but when it comes to GWB--we won't see eye to eye. You are adament about what you read immediately and don't -- your statement about reading this link when....proved that. You choose to hear what you want to hear, read what you want to read and believe what you want to believe....you don't try to see it any other way. Why should I listen to you or even consider your side when you brazenly refuse to consider mine?
I will again ignore you from this point forward and I would encourage you to ignore me from now on as well...1st request.
Let's move on, shall we....
No, it hasn't taken long for them to break their promises and change the rules to suit their needs....desperate times call for desperate measures --
Stephanie, Please, I am a Democrat, and the Story that Southern Patriot is NEGATIVE, and, Southern Patriots Comments on it are not only negative, they are over the top negative, misleading, and so far speculation about a false statement.quote:Originally posted by stephanie:
Again SP---you read my mind...
Funny how all of the NEGATIVE links get read IMMEDIATELY and raved about, but the ones that are disagreed with get ignored...
kind of like looking at a car wreck -- you just can't help yourself...hmmmm
quote:Originally posted by EdEKit:Stephanie, Please, I am a Democrat, and the Story that Southern Patriot is NEGATIVE, and, Southern Patriots Comments on it are not only negative, they are over the top negative, misleading, and so far speculation about a false statement.quote:Originally posted by stephanie:
Again SP---you read my mind...
Funny how all of the NEGATIVE links get read IMMEDIATELY and raved about, but the ones that are disagreed with get ignored...
kind of like looking at a car wreck -- you just can't help yourself...hmmmm
The story says that Hoyer MIGHT hold open a vote longer thant the Customary 15 minutes. The vote has not been taken. The holding open has not occured, but Souther Patriot says, "Just goes to show that they won't practice what they preach." At the risk of being accused of putting words in the mouth of Southern Patriot, that sentence says, clearly, in other words, witout actually expressing what it implies, Democrats Are going to hold open the Vote beyond 15 minutes.
It has not happened yet, and the article is a "premptive strike" aimed at preventing the Democrats from using the Republican Tactic of holding open votes while they threaten and cajole members to vote the party line.
You see, stephanie, most Democrats, and ALL Liberals, wait for the crime to be committed. We don't punish malefactors on SUSPICION. It is sort of like the war in Iraq, and the international law about invading other countries. YOU HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL THEY ACTUALLY PROVOKE THE WAR.
quote:Originally posted by interventor:
Ed,
If a French and a British regiment had kicked the Germans out of the Rurh in the thirties, the German general staff would have deposed Adolf (and he knew it). Lack of guts and resolve resulted in 60 million dead!
quote:Originally posted by EdEKit:Stephanie, Please, I am a Democrat, and the Story that Southern Patriot is NEGATIVE, and, Southern Patriots Comments on it are not only negative, they are over the top negative, misleading, and so far speculation about a false statement.quote:Originally posted by stephanie:
Again SP---you read my mind...
Funny how all of the NEGATIVE links get read IMMEDIATELY and raved about, but the ones that are disagreed with get ignored...
kind of like looking at a car wreck -- you just can't help yourself...hmmmm
The story says that Hoyer MIGHT hold open a vote longer thant the Customary 15 minutes. The vote has not been taken. The holding open has not occured, but Souther Patriot says, "Just goes to show that they won't practice what they preach." At the risk of being accused of putting words in the mouth of Southern Patriot, that sentence says, clearly, in other words, witout actually expressing what it implies, Democrats Are going to hold open the Vote beyond 15 minutes.
It has not happened yet, and the article is a "premptive strike" aimed at preventing the Democrats from using the Republican Tactic of holding open votes while they threaten and cajole members to vote the party line.
You see, stephanie, most Democrats, and ALL Liberals, wait for the crime to be committed. We don't punish malefactors on SUSPICION. It is sort of like the war in Iraq, and the international law about invading other countries. YOU HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL THEY ACTUALLY PROVOKE THE WAR.
quote:Originally posted by Kindred_Spirit:
I will read that link WHEN Bush stops lieing to the American Public, and when it is proven FOR A FACT that none of his promises were ever broken... Then we shall give them at least SIX months of service, and talk about it...
Otherwise, this is just a moot point.
quote:Originally posted by Schnauzer:quote:Originally posted by Kindred_Spirit:
I will read that link WHEN Bush stops lieing to the American Public, and when it is proven FOR A FACT that none of his promises were ever broken... Then we shall give them at least SIX months of service, and talk about it...
Otherwise, this is just a moot point.
Got to call this one the way I see it...When you have no comments on the original post or even don't like it you insert another topic (such as Bush Bashing) to get peoples attention away from what the original poster wanted to talk about.
Now its time for me to rally around my Conservative camp and call this a bush bashing. With that said I have seen other treads where my fellow conservatives didn't like the topic and revert to liberal name calling. Why not just have one long thread for all topics and just change the subject when we want too.
I have yet heard someone defend the Dems side of this yet.
quote:Originally posted by interventor:
The 60 million figure is an estimate of all deaths because WW II. In truth, we still might have had to fight Japan. But, it would have ended sooner and with less casualties/deaths.
My argument with Bush, is the relatively amateurish way the war and occupation were accomplished. The military practically has a checklist of what to do, and we have violated half the items on the list.
quote:Originally posted by Schnauzer:quote:Originally posted by Kindred_Spirit:
I will read that link WHEN Bush stops lieing to the American Public, and when it is proven FOR A FACT that none of his promises were ever broken... Then we shall give them at least SIX months of service, and talk about it...
Otherwise, this is just a moot point.
Got to call this one the way I see it...When you have no comments on the original post or even don't like it you insert another topic (such as Bush Bashing) to get peoples attention away from what the original poster wanted to talk about.
Now its time for me to rally around my Conservative camp and call this a bush bashing. With that said I have seen other treads where my fellow conservatives didn't like the topic and revert to liberal name calling. Why not just have one long thread for all topics and just change the subject when we want too.
I have yet heard someone defend the Dems side of this yet.
quote:Originally posted by Schnauzer:quote:Originally posted by Kindred_Spirit:
I will read that link WHEN Bush stops lieing to the American Public, and when it is proven FOR A FACT that none of his promises were ever broken... Then we shall give them at least SIX months of service, and talk about it...
Otherwise, this is just a moot point.
Got to call this one the way I see it...When you have no comments on the original post or even don't like it you insert another topic (such as Bush Bashing) to get peoples attention away from what the original poster wanted to talk about.
Now its time for me to rally around my Conservative camp and call this a bush bashing. With that said I have seen other treads where my fellow conservatives didn't like the topic and revert to liberal name calling. Why not just have one long thread for all topics and just change the subject when we want too.
I have yet heard someone defend the Dems side of this yet.
quote:Originally posted by OriginalBama:
I try not to bash a president, whether i voted for him or not. I dont care if he is democrat, republican, libertarian, independent or pink with purple dolka dots. He/Maybe she soon, is still my president. They all make bonehead decisions, lie, have a scandel or two, and make enemies. But as long as i vote i have the option to bash if i want.... sometimes they deserve it... but i do try not to. What really gets me is when people dont vote, and bash the prez... In my very humble opinion, if you dont vote, you dont have a right to bash...
If Russian Chinese and Iranian forces had Kicked the USA out of Iraq in 2003 Bush would have started a Nuclear war even if he stll has trouble saying Nuke Le Er. The reason that did not happen in 2003 or in the '30's is simple, The only nation prepared to go to war at the time was the aggressor. YES...I AM SAYING THE UNITED STATES IS THE AGGRESSOR IN THE MIDDLE EAST. No, I don't believe that is anti American coming from an American. I would consider it bellicose language coming from a Chinese, French, German, Russian, Spanish, South African, Swedish, Finish, Austrian, Canadian, Brazilian, Venezuelan, Argentinian, Chilean, or Cuban diplomat. BUT THEY ARE NOT OUR FRIENDS, AND THEY ARE NOT USING THAT WORD (VERY OFTEN.)quote:Originally posted by interventor:
Ed,
If a French and a British regiment had kicked the Germans out of the Rurh in the thirties, the German general staff would have deposed Adolf (and he knew it). Lack of guts and resolve resulted in 60 million dead!
Kindred_Spirit, I am going to claim the right to be an equal opportunity basher.quote:Originally posted by Kindred_Spirit:
I will read that link WHEN Bush stops lieing to the American Public, and when it is proven FOR A FACT that none of his promises were ever broken... Then we shall give them at least SIX months of service, and talk about it...
Otherwise, this is just a moot point.
quote:Originally posted by Southern Patriot:
Ed, my point in posting the link is to show that the dem's in Congress are already willing to break their promises and they have been in control for what 3-4 months? Besides, the name of the post is a word play of the original headline where I found the link.
quote:Originally posted by EdEKit:
YES...I AM SAYING THE UNITED STATES IS THE AGGRESSOR IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
quote:Originally posted by Southern Patriot:quote:Originally posted by OriginalBama:
I try not to bash a president, whether i voted for him or not. I dont care if he is democrat, republican, libertarian, independent or pink with purple dolka dots. He/Maybe she soon, is still my president. They all make bonehead decisions, lie, have a scandel or two, and make enemies. But as long as i vote i have the
option to bash if i want.... sometimes they deserve it... but i do try not to. What really gets me is when people dont vote, and bash the prez... In my very humble opinion, if you dont vote, you dont have a right to bash...
I don't think the occasional jab is what any of us are talking about. I know what I have referenced is the folks who constantly bash, bu add nothing constructive to the debate.