Re: It just shows who they truly are.

Robot UnicornHall of Famer

@gbrk posted:
I should apologize for being accurate and right? Do you remember what you originally said? Oh that's right you snap off without thinking so let me refresh your memory with cited and quoted remark, from you earlier in this thread when you made a statement:
"I'm so sorry you feel that 24+ US intelligence agencies". a previous statement by Robot Unicorn in an above post.
Now here is the problem. AGENCIES NOT COMMITTEES, also the Secret Service is the branch that protects the President and other government officials,
The United States Secret Service (also USSS or Secret Service) is a federal law enforcement agency under the Department of Homeland Security charged with conducting criminal investigations and protecting the nation's leaders and their families. From wikipedia.org not always the standard in accuracy but correct.
Here is yet another citation/quoted/referenced text for you, from something I said above and still believe it stands accurate.
You either can't admit you made an error or don't know what your talking about (or both). You can't answer because there AREN'T that many US intelligence agencies and either you don't know what you know or you do know what you don't know but either way pride won't let you admit it and that you were caught it called called on it so you boast you don't have to answer. (from an earlier reply by GBRK)
Now once again returning to another question regarding a statement you made with reference to me and that is:
OH! One more thing, you said "Remember when you said references weren't needed? " Please tell me WHERE and WHEN I said that because I don't think I said that in this column and I don't know the actual context that I would have said that in. (from GBRK previous post in this forum thread)
any more thoughtful replies? or meaningless boasting?

We can argue semantics of my word choice... agencies.... that's great.

I've still named 20 agencies/organizations/committees/investigation/whateveryouneed that backed the claims of Russian collusion. Your big argument is... it was only 17! Just WOW!

I showed where Jack said he didn't need a source and YOU SAID JACK IS RIGHT......

I gave you exactly what you said I couldn't produce and you're still railing.... what more do you need?

5/14/207:06 PM

❤️ 0

$Jack Hammer$ Jack HammerOld Faithful

@Robot Unicorn posted:
I'm sorry that you think the House controls the Senate. Perhaps you should talk about your shortcomings to your counselor.

I'm Not sorry you said you're a full blown idiot, not sure now who it is

you're even talking to, it ain't me because I set you straight for the last

time.

5/14/2010:11 PM

❤️ 0

gbrkOld Faithful

@Robot Unicorn posted:
We can argue semantics of my word choice... agencies.... that's great.
I've still named 20 agencies/organizations/committees/investigation/whateveryouneed that backed the claims of Russian collusion. Your big argument is... it was only 17! Just WOW!
I showed where Jack said he didn't need a source and YOU SAID JACK IS RIGHT......
I gave you exactly what you said I couldn't produce and you're still railing.... what more do you need?

I’m not going to retype everything but please feel free to use the keys to scroll up to the above post in THIS forum thread and see just WHO it was that. you addressed those comments to. You may have indeed intended to post them to Jack but you posted them to me as if I had said it. I was the one who requested you name the 24 intelligence agencies but I wasn’t the one who said the other. I then just responded to your remaining post so if you indeed meant those statements to Jack then so be it but if you check back you will see where you addressed them specifically to me as if I had said them.

Lastly there may have been a number of organizations that alluded to Russian colusion with the Trump campaign but accurately speaking nothing was ever found and demonstrated and no evidence existed until reciently when ALL released documents prove no the only collusion was the one to establish the hoax in the first place. That evidence does now exist and shows those who all along blamed Trump actually testified UNDER OATH where it counts, that no collusion or connection ever existed. It was a hoax all along and the lies was from the people who testified under oath that no connection existed yet then went on CNN and to the media saying that a connection did exist. Check it out that is the truth. Breenen and Clapper both under oath said no connection but lied to the media saying there was and now they are exposed.

5/14/2010:55 PM

❤️ 0

Robot UnicornHall of Famer

@gbrk posted:
Jack Hammer is right, Correct, accurate, but if you seek proof, to prove yourself uninformed here is some links for you From NPR about Flynn Case. and Forbes talking asking will he plead guilty to save his son. Also From Reason.com Essentially, as has been proved and shown in recently released documents Comey and other high placed FBI officials sought to entrap Flynn knowing all the time, from, most likely illegal, phone taps, what he said exactly. When Flynn didn't remember word for word what he had said he was entrapped (purgery trap) and threatened if he didn't confess to the lie they would go after his son.
From the NPR article:
It also apparently avoided prospective charges for Flynn's son. Flynn and his attorneys considered the deal to be the least bad way out of the jam.
"My guilty plea and agreement to cooperate with the special counsel's office reflect a decision I made in the best interests of my family and of our country. I accept full responsibility for my actions," Flynn said in late 2017 at the time of his plea.
Comey admitted, in a news interview, that he sent the agents over to the White House to interview (trap) Flynn and in a written document now uncovered the agents even ask if Comey wanted them to trap him in order to get him fired. Flynn was told he didn't need an attorney or what the questioning was about. Flynn didn't get a Hillary FBI, Do Not go to Jail card, pass, but instead, he had no one there with him and he was under oath. People ought to go to jail over this one but Democrats these days have immunity for their disgusting acts of treason and sedition. The reason you most likely didn't know is you either only listen to Media that is so filtered and controlled by liberals that stories like this never get coverage to protect Democrat operatives. Also, you have to dig very deep into the internet to find some things these days because liberals are controlling just what is being read or available.
The Media and others today are no better or cleaner than the sludge at the bottom of a septic tank that is pumped out. I guess Tara Reade accusing Biden has not made it to your stratosphere either has it?
Flynn's greatest crime was being a fan, supporter, and employee of Trump. Flynn also never deleted, wiped hard drives, or destroyed cell phones and data before an interview or investigation either such as Hillary did. I don't really know why I/we/others spend the time and efforts to present this because there aren't enough on here reading this that will matter and for your part you are blinded completely to anything other than the Democrat Party line so you will always have some comeback that deflects from accepting what your Parties politicians and supporters have done. History, hopefully, though will tell for others to see but then it will all be but memories for most. The damage that is done, though may be irreparable.