Campaigning Joe Biden, looking to stir up racial fears, is resurrecting Jim Crow and Jim Crow laws to try and make minorities get behind him and elect him.  What Joe fails to ever acknowledge is that actual Jim Crow laws were enacted by State DEMOCRATIC legislatures.  Fact so often get in the way of the narrative.

Be as the Bereans ( Acts 17:11 )

Original Post
gbrk posted:

Campaigning Joe Biden, looking to stir up racial fears, is resurrecting Jim Crow and Jim Crow laws to try and make minorities get behind him and elect him.  What Joe fails to ever acknowledge is that actual Jim Crow laws were enacted by State DEMOCRATIC legislatures.  Fact so often get in the way of the narrative.

And those same Democrats became Republicans and are now in charge of the Republican party. Lets try to tell the whole truth instead of just cherry picking what makes 'your side' look better.

gbrk posted:

Campaigning Joe Biden, looking to stir up racial fears, is resurrecting Jim Crow and Jim Crow laws to try and make minorities get behind him and elect him.  What Joe fails to ever acknowledge is that actual Jim Crow laws were enacted by State DEMOCRATIC legislatures.  Fact so often get in the way of the narrative.

Who's he going after anyway? Almost all blacks already vote democratic, and the educated ones that don't vote for dems know better than to believe a thing any democrat says.

Hillary: “Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd.”

 

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Sen. Joe Biden planned to spend Wednesday focusing on his official announcement that he was running for president, but the Delaware Democrat instead found himself defending remarks he made to the New York Observer about his Democratic opponents.

In the article published Wednesday, Biden is quoted evaluating presidential rivals Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-New York, former Sen. John Edwards, D-North Carolina, and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois. His remarks about Obama, the only African-American serving in the Senate, drew the most scrutiny.

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."

L. Cranston posted:
gbrk posted:

Campaigning Joe Biden, looking to stir up racial fears, is resurrecting Jim Crow and Jim Crow laws to try and make minorities get behind him and elect him.  What Joe fails to ever acknowledge is that actual Jim Crow laws were enacted by State DEMOCRATIC legislatures.  Fact so often get in the way of the narrative.

And those same Democrats became Republicans and are now in charge of the Republican party. Lets try to tell the whole truth instead of just cherry picking what makes 'your side' look better.

No, you're wrong!  Those same democrats are dead now so they didn't become republicans.  Jim Crow laws hangs in the Democrat's house.  Now those same state legislatures have become mostly Republican today but just like the hey days of the ***luxKlan the Democrats own those folks for they were democrats up until the day they died.  So that is the truth no matter how you color it.

gbrk posted:
L. Cranston posted:
gbrk posted:

Campaigning Joe Biden, looking to stir up racial fears, is resurrecting Jim Crow and Jim Crow laws to try and make minorities get behind him and elect him.  What Joe fails to ever acknowledge is that actual Jim Crow laws were enacted by State DEMOCRATIC legislatures.  Fact so often get in the way of the narrative.

And those same Democrats became Republicans and are now in charge of the Republican party. Lets try to tell the whole truth instead of just cherry picking what makes 'your side' look better.

No, you're wrong!  Those same democrats are dead now so they didn't become republicans.  Jim Crow laws hangs in the Democrat's house.  Now those same state legislatures have become mostly Republican today but just like the hey days of the ***luxKlan the Democrats own those folks for they were democrats up until the day they died.  So that is the truth no matter how you color it.

I'm sorry you're so bias against Democrats. I wish you could see the truth, but I have my doubt that you'd acknowledge the facts, even if they were presented to you on Fox News Entertainment.

The Crank

I'm sorry you're so bias against Democrats. I wish you could see the truth, but I have my doubt that you'd acknowledge the facts, even if they were presented to you on Fox News Entertainment.

~~~~~
People aren't bias against Democrats per se, speaking for myself I'm
against the existence of any liberal/communist in any form especially
that of rinos. 
 
Liberalism has destroyed all it has touched/infected and is in no way
created from the liberal handbook. 
Jack Hammer posted:

The Crank

I'm sorry you're so bias against Democrats. I wish you could see the truth, but I have my doubt that you'd acknowledge the facts, even if they were presented to you on Fox News Entertainment.

~~~~~
People aren't bias against Democrats per se, speaking for myself I'm
against the existence of any liberal/communist in any form especially
that of rinos. 
 
Liberalism has destroyed all it has touched/infected and is in no way
created from the liberal handbook. 

Correction,  

Liberalism has destroyed all it has touched/infected and America 
 is in no way created from the liberal handbook. 
Jack Hammer posted:
Jack Hammer posted:

The Crank

I'm sorry you're so bias against Democrats. I wish you could see the truth, but I have my doubt that you'd acknowledge the facts, even if they were presented to you on Fox News Entertainment.

~~~~~
People aren't bias against Democrats per se, speaking for myself I'm
against the existence of any liberal/communist in any form especially
that of rinos. 
 
Liberalism has destroyed all it has touched/infected and is in no way
created from the liberal handbook. 

Correction,  

Liberalism has destroyed all it has touched/infected and America 
 is in no way created from the liberal handbook. 

And yet, every single thing you whine about, daily, is what Republicans are doing. You can't go through life this willfully ignorant without trying.

Flubbermouth Joe can be partially ignored, for now.  If, he becomes a serious contender, simply ramp up the investigation into the Ukraine scandal.  I understand the Ukraine AG has reopened it.  Biden family profited from the ex pro-Russian Ukraine president (now in exile in Russian).  Add, their work in China where the family profited again.

Biden said he got a phone call from Margaret Thatcher, recently, she was worried about Trump as president.  I suspect, the late Baroness Thatcher called to tell him he's being recalled.  There will be a warm reception for him. But, she won't be attending. 

direstraits posted:

Flubbermouth Joe can be partially ignored, for now.  If, he becomes a serious contender, simply ramp up the investigation into the Ukraine scandal.  I understand the Ukraine AG has reopened it.  Biden family profited from the ex pro-Russian Ukraine president (now in exile in Russian).  Add, their work in China where the family profited again.

Biden said he got a phone call from Margaret Thatcher, recently, she was worried about Trump as president.  I suspect, the late Baroness Thatcher called to tell him he's being recalled.  There will be a warm reception for him. But, she won't be attending. 

Sounds just like Putin and Trump. Republican hypocrisy at its finest. 

L. Cranston posted:
direstraits posted:

Flubbermouth Joe can be partially ignored, for now.  If, he becomes a serious contender, simply ramp up the investigation into the Ukraine scandal.  I understand the Ukraine AG has reopened it.  Biden family profited from the ex pro-Russian Ukraine president (now in exile in Russian).  Add, their work in China where the family profited again.

Biden said he got a phone call from Margaret Thatcher, recently, she was worried about Trump as president.  I suspect, the late Baroness Thatcher called to tell him he's being recalled.  There will be a warm reception for him. But, she won't be attending. 

Sounds just like Putin and Trump. Republican hypocrisy at its finest. 

Who was it that leaned over to Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev  affectionately claiming he will have more flexibility to give concessions after the election, and he wins.  Was that Trump?  NO!  The Democratic leadership thows a Russian bone out in the media yard and all the yard dogs go yapping over it for an eternity.  I guess the Muller Report had no bearing or believability as apparently you haven't heard. read, or believed ... Trump and/or his Campaign or anyone in his Campaign, of any significance, had any collusion with Russia.

BTW ... Russian attempted interference in the 2016 election was happening BEFORE the election when Democrats (i.e. Obama) was in office.  If there was interference why did Obama and his Administration allow it?  Why didn't they stop it?  Why did Obama downplay any Russian interference and saying it couldn't happen and even ridiculing Trump for indicating that they might could.

 

gbrk posted:
L. Cranston posted:
direstraits posted:

Flubbermouth Joe can be partially ignored, for now.  If, he becomes a serious contender, simply ramp up the investigation into the Ukraine scandal.  I understand the Ukraine AG has reopened it.  Biden family profited from the ex pro-Russian Ukraine president (now in exile in Russian).  Add, their work in China where the family profited again.

Biden said he got a phone call from Margaret Thatcher, recently, she was worried about Trump as president.  I suspect, the late Baroness Thatcher called to tell him he's being recalled.  There will be a warm reception for him. But, she won't be attending. 

Sounds just like Putin and Trump. Republican hypocrisy at its finest. 

Who was it that leaned over to Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev  affectionately claiming he will have more flexibility to give concessions after the election, and he wins.  Was that Trump?  NO!  The Democratic leadership thows a Russian bone out in the media yard and all the yard dogs go yapping over it for an eternity.  I guess the Muller Report had no bearing or believability as apparently you haven't heard. read, or believed ... Trump and/or his Campaign or anyone in his Campaign, of any significance, had any collusion with Russia.

BTW ... Russian attempted interference in the 2016 election was happening BEFORE the election when Democrats (i.e. Obama) was in office.  If there was interference why did Obama and his Administration allow it?  Why didn't they stop it?  Why did Obama downplay any Russian interference and saying it couldn't happen and even ridiculing Trump for indicating that they might could.

 

If the Mueller report clears Trump, why is Trump working so hard to hide it?

I can't find a Republican to answer that question, yet.

Jutu posted:
Jack Hammer posted:

There must be a parrot trolling all the forums, might be a echo ?

I don't know why you give it the time of day.

Because he just can't help himself. You need to try to expand your information sources, as well. Those same old tired lies you expound, daily, are pitiful.

Add Reply

Likes (0)
Post

×
×
×
×