Skip to main content

 Former Obama CIA chief John Brennan is being exposed as the man behind the curtain in the entire Robert Mueller investigation, which has not found any Trump campaign collusion with Russia and is now trying to piece together a case for obstruction of justice.

Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani made the revelation on Hannity, making it clear that Brennan — whom Trump referred to on Tucker Carlson as a “bad person” — has been trying to kibosh Trump for years now.

Big League Politics has been exposing John Brennan and the work of his deputy Peter Strzok, a documented CIA counterespionage section chief who also worked for the FBI during the period in which the Deep State conspirators were working their “Operation Crossfire Hurricane” plot to target President Donald Trump and members of his team.

The fact that Peter Strzok answers to John Brennan (whom President Trump called a “bad person” in his interview Tuesday night with Tucker Carlson) puts Brennan squarely in the center of the controversy surrounding Operation Crossfire Hurricane, the failed Deep State plot to quash Trump’s campaign. The conspirators, including Strzok, named their effort Crossfire Hurricane because they were all using Hurricane Electric computer servers. The conspirators, including Fusion GPS, all had access to Obama’s FBI facial recognition and fingerprint analysis programs, which stored personal identifying information from American citizens in at least 14 states. The Russians managed to hack that database during the general period in which the Hurricane conspirators were using it.

Let’s look at the key roles that Strzok played for John Brennan, and also for James Comey and for Obama, in his effort to work against Trump and to take down General Flynn and others in Trump’s inner circle:

Brennan hired Strzok to write the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January 2017.

This was an official document used to spur on the Robert Mueller investigation. But the document did not actually find any evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia, it merely said that Vladimir Putin “aspired” to help Trump and that Russia “developed a clear preference for Trump.” The Christopher Steele dossier was added as an “appendix” to the ICA report, even though Brennan lied and told Congress that it was never used.

Comey Sent Strzok To London To Meet With The Australians About George Papadopoulos

George Papadopoulos was surveilled in real time by the FBI. Who set him up? Peter Strzok, whose meeting with the Australian ambassador in London provided key basis for the creation of Robert Mueller’s investigation, according to none other than the New York Times.

Tyler Durden Explains: “The FBI sent counterintelligence agents, one of whom was Peter Strzok, to London in the summer of 2016 to meet with Australian ambassador, Alexander Downer, to describe his meeting with Trump campaign advisor, George Papadopoulos. The meeting with Downer was described as “highly unusual,” and “helped provide the foundation for a case that, a year ago Thursday, became the special counsel investigation.” The FBI kept details of the operation secret from most of the DOJ – with “only about five Justice Department officials” aware of the full scope of the case.”

Strzok Cleared Hillary Clinton Right Before He Left For London

Big League Politics called attention in July 2017 to the fact that Strzok was serving on the Mueller team after personally overseeing the Hillary Clinton email investigation at the FBI and personally conducting the interview with Hillary Clinton that was not under oath and which led to no incarceration for the Democrat candidate.

Strzok also withheld information about the Hillary case from Congress according to this text:

With the pressure on, Strzok’s wife Melissa Hodgman, Associate Director of the enforcement division of the Securities and Exchange Commission, is scrubbing her Obama and Clinton links. Hodgman was promoted by Obama just two weeks before FBI director James Comey re-opened the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email scandal in 2016, leading political insiders to suspect that Hodgman might have been involved in the federal government’s cover-up.

Some of the Liked pages on her Facebook account on December 3 included “Thank You Obama” and “We Voted For Hillary.”

Strzok Sets Up Flynn

On January 24, 2017, Peter Strzok interviewed General Michael Flynn inside the White House alongside another agent. Flynn’s lawyer was not present. Flynn apparently did not tell the White House about his meeting. Guess who did? Sally Yates, the anti-Trump deputy attorney general whose underling told the FBI to shut down the Clinton Foundation case. Yates informed the White House on January 26 that Flynn met with the FBI

 

https://www.teaparty.org/john-...mueller-case-319437/

 

he American People deserve and demand to know all the names of individuals involved in the inteional omission and misrepresentation of facts related to the FISA warrant application and demand these individuals be held accountable under the law.

The Unitedtes government serves the American People - not the other way around! We sign here acknowledging our collective voices, that WE THE PEOPLE demand our country back from the DEEP STATE. Hear our voices, heed our rights, and protect American Democracy

 

Last edited by Kraven
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

PUH-leeeze! Neither you nor I nor others  outside Mueller's organization can say whether the ongoing investigation has or has not found evidence of collusion. Unlike the President's leaky-as-a-sieve staff, the true  professionals working for Mueller do not release  unauthorized previews of coming attractions. You and I and the rest of the world will learn whether they have found evidence of collusion when they decide to tell us, not before.  You are therefore advised to cease showing your ignorance,  gullibility, and naivete' by parroting the unsupportable no collusion claim so often eructated by the President and his acolytes.  Other terms around this subject matter that should be avoided by rational folks are "witch hunt" and "fake news." Leave those with the ignoramus in the Oval Office!

Now, having "disked" out all that stuff and having dodged the primary point I made, are you prepared to defend your unsupported conclusion that Mueller has found no evidence of collusion. I repeat, Kraven, you have NO way of knowing whether or not he has found such evidence. It is presumptuous of you to allege such knowledge.  Can you offer a sensible rebuttal to that or will you continue in your usual way to barf out generalized insults  and tell yourself that you have actually made some kind of a point in the actual discussion?

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×