That's the war cry of the demoslops. Yet when you ask them how is he dangerous, and who to who, they can't say. It's clear how hilliary is dangerous, and to who. You'd think they'd have an answer or sthu.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
It's clear how hilliary is dangerous, and to who. You'd think they'd have an answer or sthu
Who is Hillary dangerous to? How? Any proof?
jtdavis posted:It's clear how hilliary is dangerous, and to who. You'd think they'd have an answer or sthu
Who is Hillary dangerous to? How? Any proof?
Jt,
Let me butt in and just give you one small example. Hillary can't recall having security material handling training. She has emailed classified material on an unsecure server. I had a security clearance beyond top secret and if I had done anything close to what Hillary has done I would still be in Leavenworth. She would be a danger to the whole country.
Just heard her on the debate. She made the statement there was no proof that anyone accessed classified information she sent. Weasel wording to the max. She sent and received classified materiel on unsecured servers, which also stored same emails.
If Washington had caught up with Benedict Arnold, at Arnold's court-martial, it would be the equivalent of Arnold claiming he wasn't guilty of treason, because the English didn't get the information he sent them -- Major Andre being caught before he could deliver the goods.
Yet, another lie. She bragged about Bill reducing the deficit. As I and many others showed, there was creative accounting worthy of Bernie Madoff.
Once more:
Bill borrowed from trust fund accounts, moving the funds from long term to short term
Now exactly where did Slick Willy borrow from to show a surplus?
For example, in 2000, Clinton claimed a $230B surplus, but Clinton borrowed $152.3B from Social Security
$30.9B from Civil Service Retirement Fund
$18.5B from Federal Supplementary Medical insurance Trust Fund
$15.0B from Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund
$9.0B from the Federal Unemployment Trust Fund
$8.2B from Military Retirement Fund $3.8B from Transportation Trust Funds $1.8B from Employee Life Insurance & Retirement fund
$7.0B from others Total borrowed from off budget funds
$246.5B, meaning that his $230B surplus is actually a $16.5B deficit. ($246.5B borrowed - $230B claimed surplus
http://www.answers.com/Q/How_m..._Clinton_left_office
To illustrate further, while the annual deficits from 1998 to 2000 ceased, the national debt increased -- borrowed from one pocket and put it in another pocket. Then, claimed to find more money.
Attachments
direstraits posted:Yet, another lie. She bragged about Bill reducing the deficit. As I and many others showed, there was creative accounting worthy of Bernie Madoff.
Once more:
Bill borrowed from trust fund accounts, moving the funds from long term to short term
Now exactly where did Slick Willy borrow from to show a surplus?
For example, in 2000, Clinton claimed a $230B surplus, but Clinton borrowed $152.3B from Social Security
$30.9B from Civil Service Retirement Fund
$18.5B from Federal Supplementary Medical insurance Trust Fund
$15.0B from Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund
$9.0B from the Federal Unemployment Trust Fund
$8.2B from Military Retirement Fund $3.8B from Transportation Trust Funds $1.8B from Employee Life Insurance & Retirement fund
$7.0B from others Total borrowed from off budget funds
$246.5B, meaning that his $230B surplus is actually a $16.5B deficit. ($246.5B borrowed - $230B claimed surplus
http://www.answers.com/Q/How_m..._Clinton_left_office
To illustrate further, while the annual deficits from 1998 to 2000 ceased, the national debt increased -- borrowed from one pocket and put it in another pocket. Then, claimed to find more money.
That imaginary surplus, the lie that won't die.
jtdavis posted:It's clear how hilliary is dangerous, and to who. You'd think they'd have an answer or sthu
Who is Hillary dangerous to? How? Any proof?
Oh shut up. You know as well as anybody what the proof is. Now I'm not going to play your deflection game. If you don't want to, or can't answer the question about Trump, don't bother posting your silly questions to me.
WikiLeaks released a number of excerpts of emails between John Podesta and Hillary. Podesta attempted to deny the truth of the emails. However, Hillary upheld the contents of several.
Particularly dangerous is her statement:
"My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere," Clinton told Banco Itau, a Brazilian bank, on May 16, 2013."
http://www.lifezette.com/poliz...-trade-open-borders/
JT and Democrats, she'll sell you and the rest of us out allowing as many as possible to enter the nation.
Either, Hillary is clueless about Medicare, or using a socialist trick.
She called Medicare a single payer system. No, it isn't . There is Medicare Part B, which one must pay for. Part B only covers about 80 percent of doctor's expenses and none of the drug costs. For that, one must have a policy, usually from one's employer, when one turns 65, (retired, or not), that covers both of the expenses. Or, a supplementary policy to cover the rest of Part B and a Part D policy to cover medicine.
A new socialist trick is to define all civic services such as police and fire departments as socialist. They aren't of course, and never were defined as such in socialist doctrine.
Y'all make up definitions as you go to suit whatever you want.
We can give so many examples of how Hillary is dangerous, but the desperate Jt can only try to take the thread off subject. Yes, the Dems need to just STHU about Trump being "dangerous".
jtdavis posted:Y'all make up definitions as you go to suit whatever you want.
JT, I take my definitions for socialism from the original authors. I take the definition of single payer, from just that, only one agency involved.
George Orwell described how the left changes language to suit their needs.
Still not one example of Trump being a danger.
Bestworking posted:Still not one example of Trump being a danger.
I don't think that there is any danger of either starting a fashion trend.
Gifted, what is STHU?
Well, well. Still no examples.
giftedamateur posted:We can give so many examples of how Hillary is dangerous, but the desperate Jt can only try to take the thread off subject. Yes, the Dems need to just STHU about Trump being "dangerous".
Time for them to STHU and JDA!
OMG dire, I love it!!
Bestworking posted:OMG dire, I love it!!
I believe I detect a hint of promised revenge in those expressions.
uandurine posted:Bestworking posted:OMG dire, I love it!!
I believe I detect a hint of promised revenge in those expressions.
He's not a happy rapist, that's for sure. Maybe if he "put some ice" on his head he'd feel better.
I'd like to see Trump become a real danger to Hillary.
Dire:
When I heard Hillary making the Statement: When "Bill reduced the Deficit", as president.. I thought of your example how Slick Willy Bill played the "Ultimate Shell Game". Dem supporters will take the bait & believe anything their elites tell them.. Hook, Line and Sinker..
Dire, I'm a bit surprised she dusted off that old lie and trotted it out. Not too many demoslops try to run that by folks anymore, it has been so thoroughly debunked, and even the old perv himself, bill, has finally admitted there was no surplus, just a lot of "creative bookkeeping"-"smoke and mirrors".
For 15 years it was accepted that Bill had a surplus. Now that it is election time, the righties say it wasn't so. Why not say it 15 years ago.
jtdavis posted:For 15 years it was accepted that Bill had a surplus. Now that it is election time, the righties say it wasn't so. Why not say it 15 years ago.
I've said it for years, where have you been. My source, as shown, whitehouse.gov. Go ahead, call Obama a liar, as well.
jtdavis posted:For 15 years it was accepted that Bill had a surplus. Now that it is election time, the righties say it wasn't so. Why not say it 15 years ago.
It was said 15 years ago. The only ones that "accept it" now are his dead brained followers, just like hilliary knows they are and counts on them being, that don't have enough sense to read and understand what is posted on a GOVERNMENT site, and will argue even when bill clinton himself said there really wasn't a surplus, and "explained" the reason he claimed there was. A weak a** explanation at that. So anyway, I see you still can't tell us just ONE way Trump is dangerous. You lefties just need to sthu and jda.