Skip to main content

Our nation recently acknowledged the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) towers, with millions reiterating the infamous “never again!” trope that was popularized during the Bush administration. But what still isn’t being acknowledged by presumably most Americans is the fact that the FBI has yet to come clean about its cover-up of the real truth surrounding 9/11, including the controlled demolition of WTC 7, also known as “Building Seven.”

While the mainstream media continues to claim that the two towers – and Building Seven, which they rarely even mention – collapsed into their own footprint due to “fires,” the fact remains that this is certifiably impossible. Steel structures don’t just fall to the ground from flames, as fire isn’t hot enough to melt them – and even if they could, they wouldn’t cause entire buildings to basically disintegrate straight down into the ground.

If you’re at all familiar with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (A&E for 9/11 Truth), this group of architects and engineers has thoroughly debunked the official 9/11 tale as it’s been told to the world. It also recently announced the release of a draft report on a four-year study it conducted with the help of the University of Alaska Fairbanks, revealing what actually brought down Building Seven.

Before the full study is released, A&E for 9/11 Truth is asking for the public to comment on its initial draft release. After this two-month comment window has ended, A&E for 9/11 Truth will publish the study in its entirety, which includes three different approaches for examining what it describes as the “structural response” of Building Seven to the conditions “that may have occurred on September 11, 2001.”

“First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred,” the study’s authors announced about their methodologies. “Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).”

“Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed,” they added.

For more related news about the deception surrounding 9/11, be sure to check out

How much does the FBI know about what really took down the World Trade Center structures?

As for the FBI’s role in perpetuating the false narrative that Building Seven collapsed simply due to fire, several members of A&E for 9/11 Truth, as well as the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and several victim family members of those who were killed during the terror attack, have filed a joint lawsuit against the federal agency, requesting further assessment of the evidence.

The FBI would appear to be harboring evidence about what really destroyed Building Seven, as well as the two main towers, that it has yet to publicly release. This would suggest that the FBI is fully complicit in the cover-up, which is hardly a surprise seeing as how this same agency covered up the crimes of Hillary Clinton, and later the crimes of Comey himself.

“According to the press release on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, this is evidence relevant to the 9/11 Review Commission’s and the FBI’s compliance with the mandate from Congress, which should have been assessed by the FBI and the 9/11 Review Commission and reported to Congress,” reports The Free Thought Project.

You can learn more about the ongoing work of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in exposing the truth about one of the world’s great tragedies at the group’s website.

Original Post


Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not alwayssupported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate News Target a quackery level pseudoscience and a tin foil hat conspiracy website, as well as extreme right wing biased. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet.

there are always lots of questions,,  however few answers

first what is gained by the whole building coming down?  the same results would be gained with just the planes crashing into the buildings.

second,,, how many would have been needed to pull this off and keep a secret  

and finally, none of us will be able to uncover real secrets, so lets just move on


Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - The World Trade Center

Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.


WTC 7 Collapse

Claim: Seven hours after the two towers fell, the 47-story WTC 7 collapsed. According to "The video clearly shows that it was not a collapse subsequent to a fire, but rather a controlled demolition: amongst the Internet investigators, the jury is in on this one."





Fire Storm: WTC 7 stands amid the rubble of the recently collapsed Twin Towers. Damaged by falling debris, the building then endures a fire that rages for hours. Experts say this combination, not a demolition-style implosion, led to the roofline "kink" that signals WTC 7's progressive collapse. (Photograph by New York Office of Emergency Management)


FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom—approximately 10 stories—about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.

NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse.

According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. ft. of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down."

There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities.

Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators. Most tanks throughout the building were fairly small, but a generator on the fifth floor was connected to a large tank in the basement via a pressurized line. Says Sunder: "Our current working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time."

WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors—along with the building's unusual construction—were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse.



So...the fbi covered up the truth about 9/11 during the bush administration, covered up the crimes of clinton and comey, but comey's actions may have given trump the edge, then trump wanted comey to be loyal to him, now the right wing doesn't trust the fbi, and there is allegedly a deep state conspiracy, trump may have gotten help from russia to win the election, and trump asked ukraine eight times to investigate biden...

One of you right wing geniuses put the pieces together for me...

Add Reply


Untitled Document
Link copied to your clipboard.