Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by direstraits:

Recently, in another thread, someone pointed out the Communist Party USA approved of many Democrat party policies. Another poster, I believe Contenduhh, defended the Democrats, as not responsible for the actions of others -- CPUSA.  Shall we see tolerance for others, as well from the lefties?

You make little sense...The point is, religious extremism is for psycho's and has no place in a civilized society 

Originally Posted by woz75:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

Recently, in another thread, someone pointed out the Communist Party USA approved of many Democrat party policies. Another poster, I believe Contenduhh, defended the Democrats, as not responsible for the actions of others -- CPUSA.  Shall we see tolerance for others, as well from the lefties?

You make little sense...The point is, religious extremism is for psycho's and has no place in a civilized society 

________________________________________________________________--

I make perfect sense. A psycho believes in violence.  At worst, she indulged in non-violent protest and went to jail.  Martin Luther King Jr, did the same. 

 

You believe that tolerance is for thee and not for me.  Typical hypocrite Dem.

 

Originally Posted by direstraits:

The woman made no threats of violence.  Yet, she has been called a monster and her family has received death threats.  Our leftie posters are excellent examples that liberals/progressives are not tolerant of any view that deviates from theirs.

 ==================

Unless it is their own party members calling them perverts that's going against their gawd. Then they don't mind so much, and they sure as heck don't call them religious zealots. I wonder what went wrong here? I'd bet they thought she was a Republican and by the time they found out she was one of theirs they'd gone to far trashing her to turn back. Yep, the dem hypocrites are something to see!!

 

 

 

Unless it is their own party members calling them perverts that's going against their gawd. Then they don't mind so much, and they sure as heck don't call them religious zealots. I wonder what went wrong here? I'd bet they thought she was a Republican and by the time they found out she was one of theirs they'd gone to far trashing her to turn back. Yep, the dem hypocrites are something to see!!

 

 

 

Has it ever occurred to you that some people do not sit around and question what political party someone is in? I for you could care less. If I don't like a person's actions, I don't stop and say "Wait a minute, I wonder what party they are in?" I know there are a lot of people (like Bestworking and the Humphrey Bogart guy) who DO put everybody into the category of "Democrat" or "Republican" but I find that crazy. There are people in both parties that I like and both parties that I hate. Granted, I find most Republicans sleazy and self-serving, but I don't automatically assume that for all of them. As for Kim Davis, she is a stupid, backwards, idiot and a hypocrite. I don't care what party she affiliated with.

Nice try david, but a fail. I NEVER see you post anything against anyone except a Republican. Like I posted, you got your wires crossed up on this one. And, sleazy and self-serving describes the demoslops/gimmethats to a T. No one matters to them that doesn't go along with their ideas. Foreigners matter more to them than citizens. No one but them, in their minds, have rights.  

 

 I know there are a lot of people (like Bestworking and the Humphrey Bogart guy) who DO put everybody into the category of "Democrat" or "Republican" but I find that crazy.

 

 

Why is that crazy when that is exactly what they are? What else would you be called? BTW, do you have a problem with lefties calling every (R) Tea Party members? I doubt it.

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by uandurine:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by uandurine:

zealot's lives matter.

__________________________________

Wouldn't the zealots be those who threatened her life.

 _____________

Yep, they're just at the other end of scale.

______________________________________________________-

At worst, she withheld services as a matter of protest.  Then, was MLK Jr. a zealot, as well, for boycotting segregated services.  

 

Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by uandurine:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by uandurine:

zealot's lives matter.

__________________________________

Wouldn't the zealots be those who threatened her life.

 _____________

Yep, they're just at the other end of scale.

______________________________________________________-

At worst, she withheld services as a matter of protest.  Then, was MLK Jr. a zealot, as well, for boycotting segregated services.  

 ____

A private citizen boycotting segregated services is NOT a violation of law.  A public servant refusing to execute her duties is.

 

Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by uandurine:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by uandurine:

zealot's lives matter.

__________________________________

Wouldn't the zealots be those who threatened her life.

 _____________

Yep, they're just at the other end of scale.

______________________________________________________-

At worst, she withheld services as a matter of protest.  Then, was MLK Jr. a zealot, as well, for boycotting segregated services.  

 ____

A private citizen boycotting segregated services is NOT a violation of law.  A public servant refusing to execute her duties is.

 

____________________________________________________________________

Contenduhh,

 

I am commenting upon charges of zealotry, not of law. Please, pay attention.  In no way does withholding of services make one a zealot, as unadurine implied. Nor, should it mark one to be labeled a monster, or to receive threats of death, torture or rape.  Those who threaten or use violence are zealots.

 

Was she wrong to not issue licenses, yes, as I explained at least twice before in this thread. Does she deserve a couple of days in jail for contempt of court -- not unreasonable. Does she deserve the absolute disdain shown her by her fellow Democrats -- No!  Unfortunately, for Democrats, there is no scale of opposition -- either one is for everything they espouse, or are deserving of the torments of hell. Which, is a major reason, but not the only reason I oppose liberals, progressives, Democrats, etc.

 

 

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×