Skip to main content

Cotton farmers: Roundup resistant weeds grow in drought

Monsanto corporation, owner of the glycophosphate broad-spectrum herbicide branded as "Roundup," continues to conduct research into ways to defeat common weeds, most recently to the detriment of tried-and-true methods of farming.

The company has come under harsh criticism from farmers, scientists and activists alike for their development of a "killer" seed that, when exposed to an antibiotic, automatically destroys the seed's ability to germinate when planted.

For thousands of years, farmers have saved seeds from one crop to plant their next. However, Monsanto wants to put a stop to that cost-effective practice by forcing farmers to purchase seeds from Monsanto.

To prevent farmers from saving seeds, Monsanto developed the "killer" seed.

Most recently, Monsanto developers have discovered a frightening prospect that may force many farmers out of business, or at best, significantly drive up the price of cotton and devastate the land.

After Monsanto's 1990-era development of "BT cotton," a type of seed resistant to glycophosphate poisons which also has it's own natural pest defenses, farmers were able to reduce costs associated with applying various poisons for weed control.

However, through natural selection processes, a "Roundup" resistant weed named Palmer amaranth, a type of pig weed that grows 6 to 10 feet tall, and an inch a day even in drought, has been found proliferating in Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, North Carolina and Arkansas.

Alan York, a weed scientist at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, said the pigweed "Is potentially the worse threat since the boll weevil."

University of Georgia weed scientist Stanley Culpepper said some farmers in Georgia had to cut down their cotton, rather than harvest it, because pigweed took over the cotton and damages the harvester machines.

Because the weed is resistant to the glycophosphate poison, farmers may need to return to the tillage methods of weed control, which seriously disturbs the soil condition, and alters the delicate balance that keeps the soil from eroding and decreases soil moisture content.
Last edited {1}
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Shoals Lover:
Cotton farmers: Roundup resistant weeds grow in drought

Monsanto corporation, owner of the glycophosphate broad-spectrum herbicide branded as "Roundup," continues to conduct research into ways to defeat common weeds, most recently to the detriment of tried-and-true methods of farming.

The company has come under harsh criticism from farmers, scientists and activists alike for their development of a "killer" seed that, when exposed to an antibiotic, automatically destroys the seed's ability to germinate when planted.

For thousands of years, farmers have saved seeds from one crop to plant their next. However, Monsanto wants to put a stop to that cost-effective practice by forcing farmers to purchase seeds from Monsanto.

To prevent farmers from saving seeds, Monsanto developed the "killer" seed.

Most recently, Monsanto developers have discovered a frightening prospect that may force many farmers out of business, or at best, significantly drive up the price of cotton and devastate the land.

After Monsanto's 1990-era development of "BT cotton," a type of seed resistant to glycophosphate poisons which also has it's own natural pest defenses, farmers were able to reduce costs associated with applying various poisons for weed control.

However, through natural selection processes, a "Roundup" resistant weed named Palmer amaranth, a type of pig weed that grows 6 to 10 feet tall, and an inch a day even in drought, has been found proliferating in Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, North Carolina and Arkansas.

Alan York, a weed scientist at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, said the pigweed "Is potentially the worse threat since the boll weevil."

University of Georgia weed scientist Stanley Culpepper said some farmers in Georgia had to cut down their cotton, rather than harvest it, because pigweed took over the cotton and damages the harvester machines.

Because the weed is resistant to the glycophosphate poison, farmers may need to return to the tillage methods of weed control, which seriously disturbs the soil condition, and alters the delicate balance that keeps the soil from eroding and decreases soil moisture content.


Monsanto should face extortion charges.

Farmers should focus more on things that they can control. Is there any natural enemy for pigweed?
I can recall several years ago of a farmer in Ms. being sued because he was saving seed from his " roundup ready " soybeans.
Also high tech hormones that are given to most of the cattle,hogs,chicken ect. are not IMO healthy. About a year ago a friend of mine gave me a pack of pork chops from a pig he had raised. The pig was feed just like pigs were when I was young. Anyone ever had to go and "slop the hogs"? Anyway I had company over and needed a few more chops. Thus I got a side by side taste test. WOW our taste buds are not dead yet, the difference was much,much more than I thought it would be. Oh for simpler times and better food
Last edited by themax
Elijah, one must understand that there are farmers and there are corperate farmers. Big difference.The local,small farmer is almost gone.I understand this because the things I was taught in college,30 years ago,that I never,at the time believed,has come true. If it were not for no till farming and the use of growth hormons on steers, yes I have done it, the small farmer would no longer be here. Heck, the very meaning of "small farmer" has changed in only the last few years. A small farmer now days only farms 1000 acres or less. And has only maybe 100 head of cows. Not counting their calves of course. The days of butter and egg money, sad to say are gone. Can You remember the last milk you had that was in a glass gallon jug that you had to shake up?? I do, I may be showing my age but goodness, that cows milk right from the source was so good.
Yes, I understand also...my father was a farmer...a sharecropper...small farmer...but things evolved to the large farmer with the great equipment that cost thousands...this was 20 years ago...and perhaps things have evolved further since then but I can remember one particular farmer in our area that got wealthy off the government because of subsidies...and yes, I also understand about health care..didnt see a doctor until I went into the army...I admit that I know nothing of farming nowadays but at that particular time..it was cheap money for them...
I dont think you understand as much about farming as you think you do. Farming is a total different animal than it was 20, or even 10 years ago. Prices for seed and this technology in it is going up every year. One bag of seed costs $350 plus. Thats ONE bag. Not to mention fuel, fertilize and other necessities going up and up in price every year. If anyone is getting rich off some program...I'd love to know about it.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×