quote:
Originally posted by FirenzeVeritas:
I'm sure many on here will debate this issue based the patient's legal status in this country. That is fine, but we all should be aware of another factor.
Each hospital that performs such transplants has a board that authorizes transplants on the basis of patient need, etc. This board should look at the fact that the patient has aready had four livers, all of which failed. If I were on the board, I would not authorize a transplant for her over that of another needy applicant.
To illustrate this conumdrum, which would you choose:
1. A 35 year-old man with Hep C who is on Medicaid.
2. A 45 year-old woman who was exposed to chemicals in her job, but will go back to the same job.
3. A 55 year-old man whose liver was damaged by chronic alcohol abuse who has excellent insurance.
Not number 2 since she's gonna go back and screw up the transplanted liver.
Not number 3 because he had a choice not to screw his up but did anyway.
Number one would get my vote.
All that being said, I KNOW which one it would really be (#3) since we've already seen it with musicians (David Crosby, Phil Lesh) and movie stars (Jim Nabors, Larry Hagman). He who has the most money gets the transplant. It ain't right, it just is.