Skip to main content

British Prime Minister Theresa May said on Thursday she would tell U.S. President Donald Trump that intelligence shared between their two countries had to remain secure after leaks to U.S. media about the Manchester attack.

British police stopped sharing information about the suicide bombing with the United States, a British counter-terrorism source told Reuters earlier, after police chiefs said the leaks to media risked hindering their investigation.

 

http://www.reuters.com/article...hester-idUSKBN18L0QU

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Barack Hussein Obama, still up to his treasonous crimes against
America. It's easy for him and the sidekick when they share a
hate for this country that gave so much while spitting in the face
of the people in return. The first half black Islamic illegal president,
 bought and paid for also by enemies of our country, not his or his
arabian gods and masters. The traitorousness of their plan should
be met with the upmost severity of our Constitutional laws.

 

 

Crash.Override posted:

trump leaks info to russia

trump leaks info to philippines

info leaked from manchester... must have been democrats...

you can't make this stuff up... trumpsters will back him all the way into the ground... all while blaming democrats. this is priceless.

All your crap is "Made up Daily" by the liberal scum Media,
that's the importance of statistics from non liberal accurate
sources, again try to keep up dung boy.

Trump revealed the ISIS plot concerning bombs designed as laptops.  Even Aeroflot passengers don't deserve to be blown up.  The National Intelligence Director, McMasters, states nothing classified was revealed.

As to revealing secrets, that truly caused US soldiers to be killed and allies to be imprisoned.  In 2011, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, then the CIA Director, revealed on CBS News' 60 Minutes on May 2 announced the role of Dr. Afridi in making the U.S. assassination mission a success.  That resulted in the arrest, trial and imprisonment of Dr. Afridi by the Pakistani government.  Dr. Afridi's wife and children are in hiding within Pakistan.  Does anyone wonder why the US now has problems finding allies in the region?

On May 3, 2011, at an event in Washington, Vice President Joseph R. Biden publicly revealed the identity of the special-operations unit responsible for bin Laden's killing – SEAL Team 6.  August 6, 2011, when the Taliban shot down a Chinook helicopter in Afghanistan, killing 30 soldiers. Among the dead: 15 members of SEAL Team 6. Years later, the fallen heroes' families remain outraged at the Obama administration:  "releasing their identity, they put a target on their backs," one of the fathers told U.S. News and World Report in 2013. 

Reportedly, Trump is negotiating with the Pakistan government to release Dr. Afridi.

Yeah, Trump told Duterte there were two nuclear submarines "over there" near North Korea, in the Sea of Japan, where the USS Michigan (nuclear submarine) had just conducted a port visit in South Korea, and another submarine had joined the Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group for an exercise with the South Korean Armed Forces. 

OMG!  We have submarines in the Sea of Japan! 

Any North Korean intelligence analyst worth half his salt could have told you that.  No story here, just the sensationalism the liberal media has been employing on everything Trump says.

Oh, and BuzzFeed, that pinnacle of journalism integrity, said Pentagon officials were incensed. 

 

 

I'm not 'taking up' for Trump.  I didn't want him to be President.  I didn't want him to the the Republican candidate.  I didn't want Clinton to be President.  I voted for Rubio in the primary.  In the general election, I voted "None of the above."  Yes, that was my write-in for President.  I refused to vote for any of the clowns on the ballot for President.

I'm just tired of the sensationalism heaped upon every thing Trump says by the liberal media.  Eventually, we will be seeing the headline "In an effort to destroy the environment, Trump uses more than three sheets of toilet paper."  It seems to be getting that ridiculous. 

Our government should be scrutinized by the media.  That IS a good thing.  But it should do it with some journalistic integrity, without the sensationalism we are witnessing. 

The information concerning the location of the subs went from President Trump, a head of state, to President Duarte, also a head of state.  Trump is attempting to form an alliance to thwart the Norks and China's attempt to seize islands in the South China Sea. Which would further limit freedom of the seas and right of innocent passage.

The person who revealed the location of the subs, should be classified as a spy for the Chinese or Norks.

 

Last edited by direstraits
Crash.Override posted:

ok.. now, we're up to the 'secret communications with russia' wanted by team trump... what's the deflection for that one?

Let it be investigated. 

But, why no liberal media outcry about the government official who leaked the intelligence report about this "secret communication with russia" which revealed the source of the intelligence (communications between the Russian ambassador and the Russian government)?  Why are they not asking for that 'government official's' head on platter for revealing what would be Top Secret intelligence information?

Because it doesn't align with their sensationalist reporting against Trump. 

OldSalt posted:
Crash.Override posted:

ok.. now, we're up to the 'secret communications with russia' wanted by team trump... what's the deflection for that one?

Let it be investigated. 

But, why no liberal media outcry about the government official who leaked the intelligence report about this "secret communication with russia" which revealed the source of the intelligence (communications between the Russian ambassador and the Russian government)?  Why are they not asking for that 'government official's' head on platter for revealing what would be Top Secret intelligence information?

Because it doesn't align with their sensationalist reporting against Trump. 

Trouble is this was a meeting, alleged.  Either, someone, who was there, reported on this, or the room was bugged.  Or, the source is lying.  I remember Watergate well.  The old WashPo would not accept this as a source.  Add, the reported anti-Semitism amongst the present staff and ...? 

So what you're saying is the liberal media is an arm of Democrat Party?

Just what leaks that the GOP used are you talking about?    Do you mean the WikiLeaks information about Clinton's private email servers she used when she was Sec. State?   The possibility that WikiLeaks got that info from Russia?  How did Russia know Clinton was using a private email server?  Because they hacked it?  Isn't that a little different from a U.S. government official leaking Top Secret intelligence information to the media?   Maybe it really wasn't a good idea for Clinton to use a private email server. 

I'm not complaining about the media using the information they received.  Its not the media's job to keep government or personal secrets.  But the media is failing to recognize and report the significance of the U.S. government official leaking the Top Secret information because the media wants the leaks to continue, what ever the impact on the U.S. intelligence production effort.

Back to the original comment, Duarte faces Muslim fanatics on the large southern island of Mindanao.  Those are the craziest of the terrorists.  How crazy?  Al Qaeda considers ISIS as extreme.  ISIS  considers those on Mindanao as crazy.    After the Spanish-American war, the US army adopted a .38 special revolver.  The Muslim fanatics, opium fueled, worked themselves into a religious fervor called juegamentado.  Then, charged the soldiers.  They would take all six bullets and behead the soldier with a machete before dying.  Old soldiers brought their .44 Long Colt revolvers.  The US Army introduced the .45 ACP. 

BTW, my dad experienced the same phenomena with meth infused Waffen-SS.  He put all 8 rounds from his M-1 in them before they'd drop. One took nine rounds.  After that, he went back to a BAR and its 20 round magazine. 

 

hahahaha! liberal media bad.. but, not for using the leaked information.. and certainly not the GOP for using leaked information..

and what rock are you hiding under asking 'what leaked information used by the GOP'.. that's priceless.

but, before the election, nevermind the leaker, look at the info..

and after the election... we gotta prosecute the leaker...

the only thing that's changed.. the subject of the leak. if info is leaked about democrats.. it's awesome.. if it's about republicons, we gotta do something about it. .. another instance the conservative hypocrisy is showing its ugly head.

Crash.Override posted:

hahahaha! liberal media bad.. but, not for using the leaked information.. and certainly not the GOP for using leaked information..

and what rock are you hiding under asking 'what leaked information used by the GOP'.. that's priceless.

but, before the election, nevermind the leaker, look at the info..

and after the election... we gotta prosecute the leaker...

the only thing that's changed.. the subject of the leak. if info is leaked about democrats.. it's awesome.. if it's about republicons, we gotta do something about it. .. another instance the conservative hypocrisy is showing its ugly head.

Yes, please tell me what leaked info the GOP used.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...w-low-after-using-l/

i'm all for letting the chips fall where they may.. but i'm not ok with the hypocrisy and flat out lying by the republicons in defense of trump's actions

if the roles were reversed, do you think one republicon would hesitate to be screaming impeachment from every rooftop? they're still talking about obama's birth certificate, on these very forums.

 

 

 

Last edited by Crash.Override
Crash.Override posted:
 they're still talking about obama's birth certificate, on these very forums.

 

 

 

Yeah, I don't understand some people's fixation on Obama.   Like they just have an unnatural need to have something to carp on.  Let it go!  Its over.  Obama isn't President any more.  Let go of your hate!  (not you, Crash, but all those conservatives that can't let go.)

Last edited by OldSalt

see, we're not so different... i do not approve of every democrat policy... i can't understand what happened to the 'middle of the road'... i'm much more middle than i appear on these forums, but it seems you have to go to extremes to make a point, here.

 

if the 'secret communications' scandal proves to be true, it's over. i can think of NO GOOD REASON for this to even exist.

Last edited by Crash.Override

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×