Skip to main content

Bashing Natalie Portman for being "knocked up" at the Oscars, Mike "Huckabee" (LOVE THAT NAME) conveniently forgets the MOTHER of ALL unwed TEENAGE MOTHERS: BRISTOL PALIN!!!!!!!!!!
Can you rethugliteacons say: HYPOCRITES??????????????????? Big Grin Roll Eyes Cool

OF COURSE YOU CAN'T: IT IS NOT IN THE FOXOPHILE talking points!!!!!!!!!!! Eeker
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by elinterventor01:
It was the glorification that he decried. Portman has plenty of money and can care for her child. She shouldn't be a role model for those who can't care for theirs.


That will soar right over their pointy heads...


It doesn't subvert the fact that certain sects within the Republican establishment (1) don't want to give women a choice in their birth control; (2) don't want to teach sex education; and (3) don't want to help the unwed mothers and homeless children. Yet, when they partake in the pleasure of sex and make the mistake so many young people make they write it off as a lesson to other young people. In a way that flaunts their own prima donna status in front of the very mass they wish to control. Palin should have the common sense by now to understand we should educate about birth control because a majority of teens are going to have sex. If we make sex "dirty" or somehow "bad" then we psychologically promote the idea through human tendency to do the "bad" thing. It is no less hypocrisy than a religious leader who takes advantage of the masses by feeding off their fears and then not applying his/her own standards to themselves. It would seem they ask for forgiveness and all is behind them so they can impale their mighty sword upon others. I'm not sure you've identified the correct "pointy heads".
quote:
Originally posted by AlabamaSon:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by elinterventor01:
It was the glorification that he decried. Portman has plenty of money and can care for her child. She shouldn't be a role model for those who can't care for theirs.


That will soar right over their pointy heads...


It doesn't subvert the fact that certain sects within the Republican establishment (1) don't want to give women a choice in their birth control; (2) don't want to teach sex education; and (3) don't want to help the unwed mothers and homeless children. Yet, when they partake in the pleasure of sex and make the mistake so many young people make they write it off as a lesson to other young people. In a way that flaunts their own prima donna status in front of the very mass they wish to control. Palin should have the common sense by now to understand we should educate about birth control because a majority of teens are going to have sex. If we make sex "dirty" or somehow "bad" then we psychologically promote the idea through human tendency to do the "bad" thing. It is no less hypocrisy than a religious leader who takes advantage of the masses by feeding off their fears and then not applying his/her own standards to themselves. It would seem they ask for forgiveness and all is behind them so they can impale their mighty sword upon others. I'm not sure you've identified the correct "pointy heads".


Oh, but I have! Thanks for the confirmation!
Last edited by marksw59
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by AlabamaSon:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by elinterventor01:
It was the glorification that he decried. Portman has plenty of money and can care for her child. She shouldn't be a role model for those who can't care for theirs.


That will soar right over their pointy heads...


It doesn't subvert the fact that certain sects within the Republican establishment (1) don't want to give women a choice in their birth control; (2) don't want to teach sex education; and (3) don't want to help the unwed mothers and homeless children. Yet, when they partake in the pleasure of sex and make the mistake so many young people make they write it off as a lesson to other young people. In a way that flaunts their own prima donna status in front of the very mass they wish to control. Palin should have the common sense by now to understand we should educate about birth control because a majority of teens are going to have sex. If we make sex "dirty" or somehow "bad" then we psychologically promote the idea through human tendency to do the "bad" thing. It is no less hypocrisy than a religious leader who takes advantage of the masses by feeding off their fears and then not applying his/her own standards to themselves. It would seem they ask for forgiveness and all is behind them so they can impale their mighty sword upon others. I'm not sure you've identified the correct "pointy heads".


Oh, but I have! Thanks for the conformation!


Are you sure you meant conformation or did you mean confirmation? Should I assume you meant you are conforming?
From Huckabee:

Huckabee issued a statement today clarifying his remarks and insisting that he did not "slam" or "attack" the actress:

"Natalie is an extraordinary actor, very deserving of her recent Oscar and I am glad she will marry her baby's father," Huckabee wrote in a statement sent to The Washington Post today. "However, contrary to what the Hollywood media reported, I did not "slam" or "attack" Natalie Portman, nor did I criticize the hardworking single mothers in our country. My comments were about the statistical reality that most single moms are very poor, under-educated, can't get a job, and if it weren't for government assistance, their kids would be starving to death. That's the story that we're not seeing, and it's unfortunate that society often glorifies and glamorizes the idea of having children out of wedlock."
quote:
Originally posted by AlabamaSon:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by AlabamaSon:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by elinterventor01:
It was the glorification that he decried. Portman has plenty of money and can care for her child. She shouldn't be a role model for those who can't care for theirs.


That will soar right over their pointy heads...


It doesn't subvert the fact that certain sects within the Republican establishment (1) don't want to give women a choice in their birth control; (2) don't want to teach sex education; and (3) don't want to help the unwed mothers and homeless children. Yet, when they partake in the pleasure of sex and make the mistake so many young people make they write it off as a lesson to other young people. In a way that flaunts their own prima donna status in front of the very mass they wish to control. Palin should have the common sense by now to understand we should educate about birth control because a majority of teens are going to have sex. If we make sex "dirty" or somehow "bad" then we psychologically promote the idea through human tendency to do the "bad" thing. It is no less hypocrisy than a religious leader who takes advantage of the masses by feeding off their fears and then not applying his/her own standards to themselves. It would seem they ask for forgiveness and all is behind them so they can impale their mighty sword upon others. I'm not sure you've identified the correct "pointy heads".


Oh, but I have! Thanks for the conformation!


Are you sure you meant conformation or did you mean confirmation? Should I assume you meant you are conforming?


Conforming? NOT BLOODY LIKELY. I've proudly been a non conformist my entire life, I'm not about to start conforming to leftist bubble-headed way of thinking now. You know I meant confirmation, and yet you decided to prove an old aphorism correct... well you did it halfway... keep on braying and I know of at least one kind of hat to fit your pointy head, come to think of it I'm sure you're familiar with it's type...
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by AlabamaSon:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by AlabamaSon:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by elinterventor01:
It was the glorification that he decried. Portman has plenty of money and can care for her child. She shouldn't be a role model for those who can't care for theirs.


That will soar right over their pointy heads...


It doesn't subvert the fact that certain sects within the Republican establishment (1) don't want to give women a choice in their birth control; (2) don't want to teach sex education; and (3) don't want to help the unwed mothers and homeless children. Yet, when they partake in the pleasure of sex and make the mistake so many young people make they write it off as a lesson to other young people. In a way that flaunts their own prima donna status in front of the very mass they wish to control. Palin should have the common sense by now to understand we should educate about birth control because a majority of teens are going to have sex. If we make sex "dirty" or somehow "bad" then we psychologically promote the idea through human tendency to do the "bad" thing. It is no less hypocrisy than a religious leader who takes advantage of the masses by feeding off their fears and then not applying his/her own standards to themselves. It would seem they ask for forgiveness and all is behind them so they can impale their mighty sword upon others. I'm not sure you've identified the correct "pointy heads".


Oh, but I have! Thanks for the conformation!


Are you sure you meant conformation or did you mean confirmation? Should I assume you meant you are conforming?


Conforming? NOT BLOODY LIKELY. I've proudly been a non conformist my entire life, I'm not about to start conforming to leftist bubble-headed way of thinking now. You know I meant confirmation, and yet you decided to prove an old aphorism correct... well you did it halfway... keep on braying and I know of at least one kind of hat to fit your pointy head, come to think of it I'm sure you're familiar with it's type...


What does blood have to do with it? And why would you call something an old "original" thought? It was a simple question. You seem to be more conforming than confirming, especially if it is an old original thought.
quote:
Originally posted by AlabamaSon:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by AlabamaSon:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by AlabamaSon:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by elinterventor01:
It was the glorification that he decried. Portman has plenty of money and can care for her child. She shouldn't be a role model for those who can't care for theirs.


That will soar right over their pointy heads...


It doesn't subvert the fact that certain sects within the Republican establishment (1) don't want to give women a choice in their birth control; (2) don't want to teach sex education; and (3) don't want to help the unwed mothers and homeless children. Yet, when they partake in the pleasure of sex and make the mistake so many young people make they write it off as a lesson to other young people. In a way that flaunts their own prima donna status in front of the very mass they wish to control. Palin should have the common sense by now to understand we should educate about birth control because a majority of teens are going to have sex. If we make sex "dirty" or somehow "bad" then we psychologically promote the idea through human tendency to do the "bad" thing. It is no less hypocrisy than a religious leader who takes advantage of the masses by feeding off their fears and then not applying his/her own standards to themselves. It would seem they ask for forgiveness and all is behind them so they can impale their mighty sword upon others. I'm not sure you've identified the correct "pointy heads".


Oh, but I have! Thanks for the conformation!


Are you sure you meant conformation or did you mean confirmation? Should I assume you meant you are conforming?


Conforming? NOT BLOODY LIKELY. I've proudly been a non conformist my entire life, I'm not about to start conforming to leftist bubble-headed way of thinking now. You know I meant confirmation, and yet you decided to prove an old aphorism correct... well you did it halfway... keep on braying and I know of at least one kind of hat to fit your pointy head, come to think of it I'm sure you're familiar with it's type...


What does blood have to do with it? And why would you call something an old "original" thought? It was a simple question. You seem to be more conforming than confirming, especially if it is an old original thought.


"Not bloody likely" is an Anglicanism, but you knew that, didn't you? Original? Who said original? I said old 'aphorism'... a proverb or saying if you will, but it has no association with 'original'. On the contrary, proverbs, sayings, anecdotes, and etc. are by their very nature "old" and NOT original. So what are you babbling about?

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×