Originally Posted by direstraits:

If, Obama had a city it would be Detroit.  Unfortunately, he does have a city -- Chicago.  Under Democrat rule the population has dropped from 3.62 million to 2.7 million. Violence crime is rampant and businesses are leaving at a pace equaling the population.

 

More unfortunate, Obama now has a country he'll subject to the same destruction.

==================================

Stated by a person who doesn't know an adjective from a noun.

Originally Posted by Crash.Override:
Originally Posted by Mr. Hooberbloob:
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:

Considering he was impeached by the house for perjury, "facts" are something he is not known for.

___________________

 

considering you rt. wingnuts have called for "impeachment" of every democrat, since nixon, who cares?!?!?!?


Yes, it is well known that left "wingnuts" love a good lie.  If that's what it takes for you guys to be able to look at yourselves in the mirror every morning, then so be it.

Originally Posted by Quaildog:

Theres that Billy boy Clinton lookin’ good.UHH HUH all democrats love *****.

That brings up a question; how do repubs multiply since they don’t have sex?

quailfries, you think your boy Clinton is good looking and makes you think
about sex??? Are you still holding his picture up with one hand?

 

Originally Posted by seeweed:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

If, Obama had a city it would be Detroit.  Unfortunately, he does have a city -- Chicago.  Under Democrat rule the population has dropped from 3.62 million to 2.7 million. Violence crime is rampant and businesses are leaving at a pace equaling the population.

 

More unfortunate, Obama now has a country he'll subject to the same destruction.

==================================

Stated by a person who doesn't know an adjective from a noun.

_______________________________________________________

A standard ploy, when one is short of logical argumentation, is to attack the grammar. 

 

Originally Posted by seeweed:

Actually, the start of the demise of Detroit started with Nixon in 71 when he floated the value of  the dollar. Now, the mere fact that cars are better, last longer, need less maintenance, and are being made more and more by robots has not done Detroit any favors.

Good article in Forbes today about this very subject :

http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml

 

seeweed,

The problem with that argument is that Detroit's demise preceded 1970 as the graph shows population decline started two decades before 1970.  As I've shown in a number of cities, the common thread of a city's decline is Democrat rule over decades.  Not, its Nixon's fault.

 

 

 

detroit population

Attachments

Photos (1)
no, cars are not made better today, they are cheap and they suck
Originally Posted by seeweed:
Actually, the start of the demise of Detroit started with Nixon in 71 when he floated the value of  the dollar. Now, the mere fact that cars are better, last longer, need less maintenance, and are being made more and more by robots has not done Detroit any favors.
Good article in Forbes today about this very subject :
http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml

Originally Posted by hammaknocka:
no, cars are not made better today, they are cheap and they suck
Originally Posted by seeweed:
Actually, the start of the demise of Detroit started with Nixon in 71 when he floated the value of  the dollar. Now, the mere fact that cars are better, last longer, need less maintenance, and are being made more and more by robots has not done Detroit any favors.
Good article in Forbes today about this very subject :
http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml

As I posted above to the same statement, NO! 

A bit of good news for Detroit, the DIA art collection worth was originally estimated at $1.5 billion.  Curators have identified 38 pieces valued at $2.5 billion and several more pieces at over $100 million each. 

 

The high end auction house, Christies, toured the museum and caught hell from the usual suspects of the liberal glitterati for even considering participating in the sell of even part of the collection.  Like most large museums, DIA has a much larger collection than can be displayed. 

 

Sell of the collection should be over a period of time would yield more revenue, than a quick fire sell.  If liberals complain, shame them as valuing a painting on the wall over an elderly retired policeman or fireman.  The art isn't being destroyed, merely redistributed to other venues.  Wealthy liberals in the IT community could buy the art.  Then, lend it back to the DIA.  With, a nice brass plate, stating owner loaned the piece indefinitely.  Should see a number of Microsoft, etc names. 

Add Reply

Likes (0)
Post

×
×
×
×