Once more, JT repeats the fiction about a balanced budget under Clinton -- proving he's either clueless or a hypocrite. I've explained this several times, even including a schedule and source -- Whitehouse. gov Office of Manpower and Budget records.
Dire, I went to the source you cited. This is what I found in table 7.1 1998, + 69,270 or -29,925 1999, +125,610 or 1,920 2000 +236,241 or +86422 2001 +128,236 or +32,445 2002 -157,758 or -317,417 2009 -1,412,688 or -1,549,681 2015 -438,406 or -465,701
These are billions of dollars. I'm not sure why two different numbers are given. One is column C, the second is column G.
I'm sure you will want to call these numbers fiction numbers, but they came from you listed source. You can tell from this that the budget does much better when a democrat is in office and much worse when a tax cutting (for the .005) republican is in.