Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

But tell me this, usual Fox spin is being employed here by Cage and I really can't blame Ferrell for grabbing onto anything after all the faith he had in his golden boy Rand Paul, where is any evidence that Paul DID NOT talk about accepting earmarks in the Wall Street Journal article?

Qoute from the article itself:
Mr. Paul: The earmarks are a really small percentage of the budget but I think they symbolize a lot of the waste and I think we shouldn't do it. I tell people and told people throughout the primaries as well as the general election that I will advocate for Kentucky's interests. There are money that will be spent in Kentucky.

Granted he did advocate the committee process, what is new about that? This isn't exactly matching up with his past and NOW present BAN ALL EARMARKS stance. It is what he said in the middle to Matthew Kaminski that is so telling and now in question. Has Rand Paul denied the statements in The Wall Street Journal?
I would suggest any reader of this post, whom wants to be accurately informed of current events, carefully research previous "information" provided by this poster, and the history of the proven inaccuracy of such posts. I would also point to the manner in which these posts are delivered, which has become "lore". There is no use in attempting to provide the original poster with accurate details.
Thank You.
Let me also suggest that anyone who actually wants to see unbiased, real opinion from anything other than Fox or one of their "outlets" always ask for PROVENANCE if not provided by any post by CAGE. He is known for his misinformation and ommission of sources used in his posts. There is no need in pointing this out to Cage, he is in a deep state of denial as to his indoctrination.

Thank you.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×